Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons

**Background:** Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for hematologic malignancies, but acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is a potentially deadly adverse effect experienced by up to half of allo-HSCT recipients. Inadequate response to ster...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Tremblay, Dimitrios Tomaras, Eric Strati, Anna Forsythe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2021.19008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860248229707776
author Gabriel Tremblay
Dimitrios Tomaras
Eric Strati
Anna Forsythe
author_facet Gabriel Tremblay
Dimitrios Tomaras
Eric Strati
Anna Forsythe
author_sort Gabriel Tremblay
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for hematologic malignancies, but acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is a potentially deadly adverse effect experienced by up to half of allo-HSCT recipients. Inadequate response to steroid therapy for aGVHD is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality, including among pediatric patients, who are the focus of this study. Ruxolitinib and remestemcel-L-rknd were evaluated for the treatment of steroid-refractory (SR) aGVHD in two separate single-arm trials. To effectively compare the safety and efficacy of these treatments without a head-to-head trial, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted. **Methods:** Regression techniques were used to adjust individual patient-level data from the remestemcel-L-rknd trial to mutually reported baseline characteristics from the ruxolitinib trial. Outcomes of interest included a 28-day overall response rate (ORR), a 28-day ORR in the grade III-IV aGVHD population, and adverse events (AEs). **Results:** In the full populations, the STC of risk ratios (RRs) found treatment with remestemcel-L-rknd to be associated with a numerical but not statistically significant improvement in the 28-day ORR versus ruxolitinib. In the grade III-IV aGVHD sub-group, the STC showed significantly improved 28-day ORR for remestemcel-L-rknd versus ruxolitinib (_P_=0.04). Remestemcel-L-rknd was also associated with improved safety outcomes (_P_<0.05) in 17 out of 30 AEs, including hematologic events, peripheral edema, muscular weakness, nausea, back pain, and fatigue. **Conclusion:** Remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with significant improvements in day 28 ORR compared with ruxolitinib in patients with severe (grade III-IV) SR aGVHD. Across all grades of SR aGVHD, remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with fewer all-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (27/30) available for comparison, including the majority reaching statistical significance.
format Article
id doaj-art-01900f92edd241479260977f04f076b1
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-01900f92edd241479260977f04f076b12025-02-10T16:13:13ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362021-02-0181Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment ComparisonsGabriel TremblayDimitrios TomarasEric StratiAnna Forsythe**Background:** Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for hematologic malignancies, but acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is a potentially deadly adverse effect experienced by up to half of allo-HSCT recipients. Inadequate response to steroid therapy for aGVHD is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality, including among pediatric patients, who are the focus of this study. Ruxolitinib and remestemcel-L-rknd were evaluated for the treatment of steroid-refractory (SR) aGVHD in two separate single-arm trials. To effectively compare the safety and efficacy of these treatments without a head-to-head trial, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted. **Methods:** Regression techniques were used to adjust individual patient-level data from the remestemcel-L-rknd trial to mutually reported baseline characteristics from the ruxolitinib trial. Outcomes of interest included a 28-day overall response rate (ORR), a 28-day ORR in the grade III-IV aGVHD population, and adverse events (AEs). **Results:** In the full populations, the STC of risk ratios (RRs) found treatment with remestemcel-L-rknd to be associated with a numerical but not statistically significant improvement in the 28-day ORR versus ruxolitinib. In the grade III-IV aGVHD sub-group, the STC showed significantly improved 28-day ORR for remestemcel-L-rknd versus ruxolitinib (_P_=0.04). Remestemcel-L-rknd was also associated with improved safety outcomes (_P_<0.05) in 17 out of 30 AEs, including hematologic events, peripheral edema, muscular weakness, nausea, back pain, and fatigue. **Conclusion:** Remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with significant improvements in day 28 ORR compared with ruxolitinib in patients with severe (grade III-IV) SR aGVHD. Across all grades of SR aGVHD, remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with fewer all-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (27/30) available for comparison, including the majority reaching statistical significance.https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2021.19008
spellingShingle Gabriel Tremblay
Dimitrios Tomaras
Eric Strati
Anna Forsythe
Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons
title_sort comparative effectiveness of remestemcel l rknd versus ruxolitinib in pediatric patients with steroid refractory acute graft versus host disease using simulated treatment comparisons
url https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2021.19008
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieltremblay comparativeeffectivenessofremestemcellrkndversusruxolitinibinpediatricpatientswithsteroidrefractoryacutegraftversushostdiseaseusingsimulatedtreatmentcomparisons
AT dimitriostomaras comparativeeffectivenessofremestemcellrkndversusruxolitinibinpediatricpatientswithsteroidrefractoryacutegraftversushostdiseaseusingsimulatedtreatmentcomparisons
AT ericstrati comparativeeffectivenessofremestemcellrkndversusruxolitinibinpediatricpatientswithsteroidrefractoryacutegraftversushostdiseaseusingsimulatedtreatmentcomparisons
AT annaforsythe comparativeeffectivenessofremestemcellrkndversusruxolitinibinpediatricpatientswithsteroidrefractoryacutegraftversushostdiseaseusingsimulatedtreatmentcomparisons