Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France

Abstract Bioaerosols have impacts on atmospheric processes, as well as ecosystem and human health. Common bioaerosol collection methods include impaction, liquid impingement, filtration, and electrostatic precipitation. These methods are used by active samplers that require an air mover and power, b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin P. Dillon, Romie Tignat-Perrier, Muriel Joly, Sydonia N. C. M. Grogan, Catherine Larose, Pierre Amato, Gediminas Mainelis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2023-01-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220403
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862785605369856
author Kevin P. Dillon
Romie Tignat-Perrier
Muriel Joly
Sydonia N. C. M. Grogan
Catherine Larose
Pierre Amato
Gediminas Mainelis
author_facet Kevin P. Dillon
Romie Tignat-Perrier
Muriel Joly
Sydonia N. C. M. Grogan
Catherine Larose
Pierre Amato
Gediminas Mainelis
author_sort Kevin P. Dillon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Bioaerosols have impacts on atmospheric processes, as well as ecosystem and human health. Common bioaerosol collection methods include impaction, liquid impingement, filtration, and electrostatic precipitation. These methods are used by active samplers that require an air mover and power, but this requirement can also represent a major constraint in field studies. Alternatively, passive samplers do not require power and can operate for long times. In this study, the Rutgers Electrostatic Passive Sampler (REPS), which captures particles by electrostatic attraction and gravitational settling, was deployed at the summit of puy de Dôme (1465 m a.s.l., France) alongside an active PM10 sampler (~1000 L min−1) collecting aerosols on a quartz fiber filter. The diversity of the airborne bacteria captured by both samplers across six weekly sampling periods was examined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The dominant phyla observed by both samplers were similar and included Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteriota. Overall, 12 to 63% of the total bacterial richness at the genus level was shared between the two samplers, depending upon a paired sample, i.e., sampling week. The PM10 sampler and REPS detected the same dominant genera, including Lysinibacillus and Sphingomonas, although their relative abundances for each paired sampler varied. The observed bacterial richness and diversity, as estimated through Shannon’s and Simpson’s indexes, were significantly greater in REPS samples compared to the PM10 samples. The results suggest that REPS could be used for simple and convenient sampling of bioaerosols, especially in remote areas and other locations with limited power access.
format Article
id doaj-art-033850f5ec3944a3bf15b111ca14bb99
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-033850f5ec3944a3bf15b111ca14bb992025-02-09T12:21:56ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092023-01-0123411610.4209/aaqr.220403Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, FranceKevin P. Dillon0Romie Tignat-Perrier1Muriel Joly2Sydonia N. C. M. Grogan3Catherine Larose4Pierre Amato5Gediminas Mainelis6Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers UniversityInsistut des Géosciences de l’Environnement, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INPUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INP Clermont Auvergne, Institut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand (ICCF)Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers UniversityUniv Lyon, CNRS, INSA LyonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INP Clermont Auvergne, Institut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand (ICCF)Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers UniversityAbstract Bioaerosols have impacts on atmospheric processes, as well as ecosystem and human health. Common bioaerosol collection methods include impaction, liquid impingement, filtration, and electrostatic precipitation. These methods are used by active samplers that require an air mover and power, but this requirement can also represent a major constraint in field studies. Alternatively, passive samplers do not require power and can operate for long times. In this study, the Rutgers Electrostatic Passive Sampler (REPS), which captures particles by electrostatic attraction and gravitational settling, was deployed at the summit of puy de Dôme (1465 m a.s.l., France) alongside an active PM10 sampler (~1000 L min−1) collecting aerosols on a quartz fiber filter. The diversity of the airborne bacteria captured by both samplers across six weekly sampling periods was examined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The dominant phyla observed by both samplers were similar and included Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteriota. Overall, 12 to 63% of the total bacterial richness at the genus level was shared between the two samplers, depending upon a paired sample, i.e., sampling week. The PM10 sampler and REPS detected the same dominant genera, including Lysinibacillus and Sphingomonas, although their relative abundances for each paired sampler varied. The observed bacterial richness and diversity, as estimated through Shannon’s and Simpson’s indexes, were significantly greater in REPS samples compared to the PM10 samples. The results suggest that REPS could be used for simple and convenient sampling of bioaerosols, especially in remote areas and other locations with limited power access.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220403Passive samplerBioaerosolsDiversity
spellingShingle Kevin P. Dillon
Romie Tignat-Perrier
Muriel Joly
Sydonia N. C. M. Grogan
Catherine Larose
Pierre Amato
Gediminas Mainelis
Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Passive sampler
Bioaerosols
Diversity
title Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France
title_full Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France
title_fullStr Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France
title_short Comparison of Airborne Bacterial Populations Determined by Passive and Active Air Sampling at puy de Dôme, France
title_sort comparison of airborne bacterial populations determined by passive and active air sampling at puy de dome france
topic Passive sampler
Bioaerosols
Diversity
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220403
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinpdillon comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance
AT romietignatperrier comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance
AT murieljoly comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance
AT sydoniancmgrogan comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance
AT catherinelarose comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance
AT pierreamato comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance
AT gediminasmainelis comparisonofairbornebacterialpopulationsdeterminedbypassiveandactiveairsamplingatpuydedomefrance