A comparative analysis for crack identification in structural health monitoring: a focus on experimental crack length prediction with YUKI and POD-RBF

In recent years, substantial investments in structural construction underscore the paramount importance of ensuring structural integrity for safety and dependability. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has emerged as a pivotal tool for assessing structural health, with an emphasis on damage detectio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zenzen, Roumaissa, Ayadi, Ayoub, Benaissa, Brahim, Belaidi, Idir, Sukic, Enes, Khatir, Tawfiq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Académie des sciences 2024-03-01
Series:Comptes Rendus. Mécanique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/mecanique/articles/10.5802/crmeca.241/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent years, substantial investments in structural construction underscore the paramount importance of ensuring structural integrity for safety and dependability. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has emerged as a pivotal tool for assessing structural health, with an emphasis on damage detection, localisation, and quantification, particularly through vibration-based methods that exploit variations in modal properties as precursors to structural damage. This study presents an innovative methodology that synergistically combines Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Radial Basis Function interpolation for predicting structural responses based on crack parameters. Additionally, the YUKI algorithm, leveraging population clustering for optimisation, is introduced. The approach is rigorously assessed through experimental analysis of two distinct beams (Beam I and Beam II) exhibiting varying crack depths. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the POD-RBF-YUKI approach, indicating a notable level of accuracy and consistency. Comparative evaluations with conventional optimisation algorithms, namely Cuckoo, Bat, and Particle Swarm Optimisation, reveal similar Mean Percentage Error values but with increased result variability, whereas Deep Artificial Neural Network models with varied hidden layer sizes.
ISSN:1873-7234