Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system

Background and purpose:: This study focuses on evaluating a sub-fractionation workflow for intrafraction motion mitigation of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system. Materials and methods:: The investigated workflow consisted of two sub-fractions where int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgios Tsekas, Cornel Zachiu, Gijsbert H. Bol, Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp, Sandrine M.G. van de Pol, Johannes C.J. de Boer, Bas W. Raaymakers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000119
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and purpose:: This study focuses on evaluating a sub-fractionation workflow for intrafraction motion mitigation of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system. Materials and methods:: The investigated workflow consisted of two sub-fractions where intrafraction drift correction steps were applied based on a daily reference plan. However, the daily contours were only rigidly shifted to match the intrafraction anatomies and therefore the clinical dosimetric constraints might be violated. In this work, daily contours were deformed to match the intrafraction anatomies and the online plans were re-calculated for a total of 15 patients. The deformed prostate contours were inspected by radiation oncologists and corrections were performed when necessary. Finally, a dose-volume parameter evaluation was performed on a sub-fraction level using the clinical plan parameters. Results:: Clinically acceptable coverage was reported for the target structures resulting in mean V95% of 99.7 % and 97.8 % for the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) respectively. Sub-fractions with insufficient CTV dose can be explained by the presence of intrafraction rotations and deformations that were not taken into account during intrafraction corrections. Additionally, for no sub-fraction the dose to the organs-at-risk exceeded the clinical constraints. Conclusion:: Given our results on the CTV coverage we can conclude that the sub-fractionation workflow met the dosimetric constraints for the hypofractionated treatment of the analyzed group of prostate cancer patients. A future dose accumulation study can provide further insights into the suitability of the clinical margins.
ISSN:2405-6316