Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin

In recent years, lignin analysis utilizing quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) has attracted considerable interest and has been the subject of numerous studies. However, evaluating the measurement uncertainty of qNMR results of lignin remains a challenge. Specifically, uncertainty origina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shrikant Shivaji Pawade, Lauri Toom, Koit Herodes, Ivo Leito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2025-01-01
Series:BioResources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24185
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859592721858560
author Shrikant Shivaji Pawade
Lauri Toom
Koit Herodes
Ivo Leito
author_facet Shrikant Shivaji Pawade
Lauri Toom
Koit Herodes
Ivo Leito
author_sort Shrikant Shivaji Pawade
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, lignin analysis utilizing quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) has attracted considerable interest and has been the subject of numerous studies. However, evaluating the measurement uncertainty of qNMR results of lignin remains a challenge. Specifically, uncertainty originating from lignin sampling or subsampling has been overlooked in a large majority of articles. Although lignin is a reasonably homogeneous substance, it is nevertheless a solid, and individual samples collected from the same bulk may have somewhat different compositions depending on mixing and the amount of sample taken. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of sampling uncertainty on qNMR analysis of lignin-based analysis as a case study, with an exclusive focus on the relative quantification method. The results from this study demonstrate that sample-to-sample variations can contribute to approximately half of the variability in actual qNMR measurements. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of sample-to-sample variability was 2.4%. In contrast, the other sources of variability related to qNMR, including measurement, baseline irregularities, and partial peak overlap, caused an RSD of 4.4%. The total variability RSD was 5.0%. In this article, two calculation approaches were presented for evaluating the uncertainty due to sampling from replicate measurement data of different samples, which may be helpful for practitioners in the field.
format Article
id doaj-art-10db5185e8494225b1ebe48728f59b1c
institution Kabale University
issn 1930-2126
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher North Carolina State University
record_format Article
series BioResources
spelling doaj-art-10db5185e8494225b1ebe48728f59b1c2025-02-10T23:56:27ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21262025-01-01201223422422717Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of LigninShrikant Shivaji Pawade0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8457-3644Lauri Toom1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-8180Koit Herodes2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-1784Ivo Leito3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-4964University of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, EstoniaUniversity of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, EstoniaUniversity of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, EstoniaUniversity of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, EstoniaIn recent years, lignin analysis utilizing quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) has attracted considerable interest and has been the subject of numerous studies. However, evaluating the measurement uncertainty of qNMR results of lignin remains a challenge. Specifically, uncertainty originating from lignin sampling or subsampling has been overlooked in a large majority of articles. Although lignin is a reasonably homogeneous substance, it is nevertheless a solid, and individual samples collected from the same bulk may have somewhat different compositions depending on mixing and the amount of sample taken. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of sampling uncertainty on qNMR analysis of lignin-based analysis as a case study, with an exclusive focus on the relative quantification method. The results from this study demonstrate that sample-to-sample variations can contribute to approximately half of the variability in actual qNMR measurements. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of sample-to-sample variability was 2.4%. In contrast, the other sources of variability related to qNMR, including measurement, baseline irregularities, and partial peak overlap, caused an RSD of 4.4%. The total variability RSD was 5.0%. In this article, two calculation approaches were presented for evaluating the uncertainty due to sampling from replicate measurement data of different samples, which may be helpful for practitioners in the field.https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24185 ligninnmrquantitative nmr samplinguncertainty
spellingShingle Shrikant Shivaji Pawade
Lauri Toom
Koit Herodes
Ivo Leito
Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin
BioResources
lignin
nmr
quantitative nmr
sampling
uncertainty
title Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin
title_full Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin
title_fullStr Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin
title_short Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin
title_sort evaluating sampling uncertainty in the quantitative 1h nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of lignin
topic lignin
nmr
quantitative nmr
sampling
uncertainty
url https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24185
work_keys_str_mv AT shrikantshivajipawade evaluatingsamplinguncertaintyinthequantitative1hnuclearmagneticresonanceanalysisoflignin
AT lauritoom evaluatingsamplinguncertaintyinthequantitative1hnuclearmagneticresonanceanalysisoflignin
AT koitherodes evaluatingsamplinguncertaintyinthequantitative1hnuclearmagneticresonanceanalysisoflignin
AT ivoleito evaluatingsamplinguncertaintyinthequantitative1hnuclearmagneticresonanceanalysisoflignin