The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field

# Background As with most sports, participating in Track and Field (T&F) has inherent injury risks and a previous injury often predisposes athletes to a greater future injury risk. However, the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F have not been closely examined. # P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Hopkins, Samantha Kanny, Catherine Headley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2022-06-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.35579
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825196989656072192
author Chris Hopkins
Samantha Kanny
Catherine Headley
author_facet Chris Hopkins
Samantha Kanny
Catherine Headley
author_sort Chris Hopkins
collection DOAJ
description # Background As with most sports, participating in Track and Field (T&F) has inherent injury risks and a previous injury often predisposes athletes to a greater future injury risk. However, the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F have not been closely examined. # Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F and compare differences in the time loss associated with initial and recurrent injuries by sex and T&F discipline. # Study Design Descriptive Epidemiology Study # Methods Data from the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program were analyzed to describe the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F between 2009 and 2014. Comparisons of recurrent injury proportions by T&F discipline were made using Injury Proportion Ratios (IPR) and injury-associated time loss comparisons by injury type and sex were made using Negative Binomial Regression. # Results Four hundred and seventy-four injuries were reported, 13.1% of which were classified as recurrent injuries. T&F athletes who competed in jumps experienced a lower proportion of recurrent injuries (6.1%) than runners (14.6%) and throwers (19.2%) (Recurrent IPR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, p\<0.05). When controlling for sex and injury diagnosis, T&F athletes experienced 50% greater time loss from sport following a recurrent injury than an initial injury (95% CI 17%-107%, p\<0.01). # Conclusions Recurrent injuries in T&F athletes account for greater time loss than initial injuries, despite sex or injury diagnosis. The current study indicates a need for further research to assess factors contributing to time loss. # Level of Evidence Level 3
format Article
id doaj-art-11114524fc0f4fbbbf8325a707b5d58a
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-11114524fc0f4fbbbf8325a707b5d58a2025-02-11T20:27:45ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962022-06-01174The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and FieldChris HopkinsSamantha KannyCatherine Headley# Background As with most sports, participating in Track and Field (T&F) has inherent injury risks and a previous injury often predisposes athletes to a greater future injury risk. However, the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F have not been closely examined. # Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F and compare differences in the time loss associated with initial and recurrent injuries by sex and T&F discipline. # Study Design Descriptive Epidemiology Study # Methods Data from the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program were analyzed to describe the frequency and burden of recurrent injuries in collegiate T&F between 2009 and 2014. Comparisons of recurrent injury proportions by T&F discipline were made using Injury Proportion Ratios (IPR) and injury-associated time loss comparisons by injury type and sex were made using Negative Binomial Regression. # Results Four hundred and seventy-four injuries were reported, 13.1% of which were classified as recurrent injuries. T&F athletes who competed in jumps experienced a lower proportion of recurrent injuries (6.1%) than runners (14.6%) and throwers (19.2%) (Recurrent IPR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, p\<0.05). When controlling for sex and injury diagnosis, T&F athletes experienced 50% greater time loss from sport following a recurrent injury than an initial injury (95% CI 17%-107%, p\<0.01). # Conclusions Recurrent injuries in T&F athletes account for greater time loss than initial injuries, despite sex or injury diagnosis. The current study indicates a need for further research to assess factors contributing to time loss. # Level of Evidence Level 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.35579
spellingShingle Chris Hopkins
Samantha Kanny
Catherine Headley
The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field
title_full The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field
title_fullStr The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field
title_full_unstemmed The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field
title_short The Problem of Recurrent Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field
title_sort problem of recurrent injuries in collegiate track and field
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.35579
work_keys_str_mv AT chrishopkins theproblemofrecurrentinjuriesincollegiatetrackandfield
AT samanthakanny theproblemofrecurrentinjuriesincollegiatetrackandfield
AT catherineheadley theproblemofrecurrentinjuriesincollegiatetrackandfield
AT chrishopkins problemofrecurrentinjuriesincollegiatetrackandfield
AT samanthakanny problemofrecurrentinjuriesincollegiatetrackandfield
AT catherineheadley problemofrecurrentinjuriesincollegiatetrackandfield