Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study

Introduction: Personal mobility devices (PMDs), such as electronic scooters or motorised bicycles, are efficient modes of transportation. Their recent popularity has also resulted in an increase in PMD-related injuries. We aimed to characterise and compare the nature of injuries sustained by PMD use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Don Thong Siang Koh, Yew Lok Woo, Ting Hway Wong, Mann Hong Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications 2022-08-01
Series:Singapore Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021050
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861009508466688
author Don Thong Siang Koh
Yew Lok Woo
Ting Hway Wong
Mann Hong Tan
author_facet Don Thong Siang Koh
Yew Lok Woo
Ting Hway Wong
Mann Hong Tan
author_sort Don Thong Siang Koh
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Personal mobility devices (PMDs), such as electronic scooters or motorised bicycles, are efficient modes of transportation. Their recent popularity has also resulted in an increase in PMD-related injuries. We aimed to characterise and compare the nature of injuries sustained by PMD users and bicycle riders. Methods: This retrospective study compared injury patterns among PMD and bicycle users. 140 patients were admitted between November 2013 and September 2018. Parameters studied included patients’ demographics (e.g. age, gender and body mass index), type of PMD, nature of injury, surgical intervention required, duration of hospitalisation and time off work. Results: Of 140 patients, 46 (32.9%) patients required treatment at the department of orthopaedic surgery. 19 patients were PMD users while 27 were bicycle riders. 16 (84.2%) patients with PMD-related injuries were men. PMD users were significantly younger (mean age 45 ± 15 years) when compared to bicycle riders (mean age 56 ± 17 years; P <0.05). A quarter (n = 5, 26.3%) of PMD users sustained open fractures and over half (n = 10, 52.6%) required surgical intervention. Among 27 bicycle users, 7.4% (n = 2) of patients sustained open fractures and 70.4% (n = 19) required surgical intervention. Both groups had comparable inpatient stay duration and time off work. Conclusion: PMD-related orthopaedic traumas are high-energy injuries, with higher rates of open fractures, when compared to bicycle injuries. In addition, PMD users are significantly younger and of economically viable age. Prolonged hospitalisation and time off work have socioeconomic implications. Caution should be exercised when using PMDs.
format Article
id doaj-art-124d81e5de8341ea9852cb406fc01bf4
institution Kabale University
issn 0037-5675
2737-5935
language English
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Singapore Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-124d81e5de8341ea9852cb406fc01bf42025-02-10T05:24:25ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352022-08-0163844544910.11622/smedj.2021050Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative studyDon Thong Siang KohYew Lok WooTing Hway WongMann Hong TanIntroduction: Personal mobility devices (PMDs), such as electronic scooters or motorised bicycles, are efficient modes of transportation. Their recent popularity has also resulted in an increase in PMD-related injuries. We aimed to characterise and compare the nature of injuries sustained by PMD users and bicycle riders. Methods: This retrospective study compared injury patterns among PMD and bicycle users. 140 patients were admitted between November 2013 and September 2018. Parameters studied included patients’ demographics (e.g. age, gender and body mass index), type of PMD, nature of injury, surgical intervention required, duration of hospitalisation and time off work. Results: Of 140 patients, 46 (32.9%) patients required treatment at the department of orthopaedic surgery. 19 patients were PMD users while 27 were bicycle riders. 16 (84.2%) patients with PMD-related injuries were men. PMD users were significantly younger (mean age 45 ± 15 years) when compared to bicycle riders (mean age 56 ± 17 years; P <0.05). A quarter (n = 5, 26.3%) of PMD users sustained open fractures and over half (n = 10, 52.6%) required surgical intervention. Among 27 bicycle users, 7.4% (n = 2) of patients sustained open fractures and 70.4% (n = 19) required surgical intervention. Both groups had comparable inpatient stay duration and time off work. Conclusion: PMD-related orthopaedic traumas are high-energy injuries, with higher rates of open fractures, when compared to bicycle injuries. In addition, PMD users are significantly younger and of economically viable age. Prolonged hospitalisation and time off work have socioeconomic implications. Caution should be exercised when using PMDs.https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021050bicycle injuriesopen fracturespersonal mobility devicepublic healthtrauma
spellingShingle Don Thong Siang Koh
Yew Lok Woo
Ting Hway Wong
Mann Hong Tan
Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study
Singapore Medical Journal
bicycle injuries
open fractures
personal mobility device
public health
trauma
title Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study
title_full Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study
title_fullStr Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study
title_short Patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders: a comparative study
title_sort patterns of orthopaedic injury among hospitalised personal mobility device users and bicycle riders a comparative study
topic bicycle injuries
open fractures
personal mobility device
public health
trauma
url https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021050
work_keys_str_mv AT donthongsiangkoh patternsoforthopaedicinjuryamonghospitalisedpersonalmobilitydeviceusersandbicycleridersacomparativestudy
AT yewlokwoo patternsoforthopaedicinjuryamonghospitalisedpersonalmobilitydeviceusersandbicycleridersacomparativestudy
AT tinghwaywong patternsoforthopaedicinjuryamonghospitalisedpersonalmobilitydeviceusersandbicycleridersacomparativestudy
AT mannhongtan patternsoforthopaedicinjuryamonghospitalisedpersonalmobilitydeviceusersandbicycleridersacomparativestudy