No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries
# Background Patients report psychological barriers as important when returning to sport, however, psychological outcome measures are seldom included in return to sport (RTS) assessment. There is a need for clinical trials to integrate psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in return to spo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
North American Sports Medicine Institute
2023-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81064 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1825139373189890048 |
---|---|
author | Ramana Piussi Rebecca Simonson Johan Högberg Roland Thomeé Kristian Samuelsson Eric Hamrin Senorski |
author_facet | Ramana Piussi Rebecca Simonson Johan Högberg Roland Thomeé Kristian Samuelsson Eric Hamrin Senorski |
author_sort | Ramana Piussi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | # Background
Patients report psychological barriers as important when returning to sport, however, psychological outcome measures are seldom included in return to sport (RTS) assessment. There is a need for clinical trials to integrate psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in return to sport batteries assessing patients treated with ACL reconstruction.
# Objective
The aim of this study was to determine the association between passing clinical tests of muscle function and psychological PROs and sustaining a second ACL injury in patients who RTS after primary ACL reconstruction.
# Design
Retrospective Cohort study
# Methods
Patients' sex, age, height and weight, and the results of strength and hop tests, as well as answers to PRO's (including Tegner activity scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) as well as the Quality of Life (QoL) subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score \[KOOS\]), were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific registry. Four different test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs were created to assess whether patients were ready to RTS. Passing each of the test batteries (yes/no) was used as an independent variable. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed, with sustaining a second ACL injury (either ipsi- or contralateral; yes/no) within two years of RTS as the dependent variable.
# Results
A total of 419 patients (male, n=214; 51%) were included, of which 51 (12.2%) suffered a second ACL injury within the first two years after RTS. There were no differences in passing rates in the different RTS test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs for patients who suffered a second ACL injury compared to patients who did not.
# Conclusion
No association between passing the RTS clinical tests batteries comprising muscle function and psychological PROs used, and the risk of a second ACL injury could be found.
# Level of Evidence
3 |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-15d226530e91443b8a85f48e3d73a55f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2159-2896 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
publisher | North American Sports Medicine Institute |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
spelling | doaj-art-15d226530e91443b8a85f48e3d73a55f2025-02-11T20:29:58ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962023-08-01184No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test BatteriesRamana PiussiRebecca SimonsonJohan HögbergRoland ThomeéKristian SamuelssonEric Hamrin Senorski# Background Patients report psychological barriers as important when returning to sport, however, psychological outcome measures are seldom included in return to sport (RTS) assessment. There is a need for clinical trials to integrate psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in return to sport batteries assessing patients treated with ACL reconstruction. # Objective The aim of this study was to determine the association between passing clinical tests of muscle function and psychological PROs and sustaining a second ACL injury in patients who RTS after primary ACL reconstruction. # Design Retrospective Cohort study # Methods Patients' sex, age, height and weight, and the results of strength and hop tests, as well as answers to PRO's (including Tegner activity scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) as well as the Quality of Life (QoL) subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score \[KOOS\]), were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific registry. Four different test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs were created to assess whether patients were ready to RTS. Passing each of the test batteries (yes/no) was used as an independent variable. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed, with sustaining a second ACL injury (either ipsi- or contralateral; yes/no) within two years of RTS as the dependent variable. # Results A total of 419 patients (male, n=214; 51%) were included, of which 51 (12.2%) suffered a second ACL injury within the first two years after RTS. There were no differences in passing rates in the different RTS test batteries comprising muscle function tests and PROs for patients who suffered a second ACL injury compared to patients who did not. # Conclusion No association between passing the RTS clinical tests batteries comprising muscle function and psychological PROs used, and the risk of a second ACL injury could be found. # Level of Evidence 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81064 |
spellingShingle | Ramana Piussi Rebecca Simonson Johan Högberg Roland Thomeé Kristian Samuelsson Eric Hamrin Senorski No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
title | No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries |
title_full | No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries |
title_fullStr | No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries |
title_full_unstemmed | No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries |
title_short | No Effect of Return to Sport Test Batteries with and without Psychological PROs on the Risk of a Second ACL Injury: A Critical Assessment of Four Different Test Batteries |
title_sort | no effect of return to sport test batteries with and without psychological pros on the risk of a second acl injury a critical assessment of four different test batteries |
url | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.81064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramanapiussi noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries AT rebeccasimonson noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries AT johanhogberg noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries AT rolandthomee noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries AT kristiansamuelsson noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries AT erichamrinsenorski noeffectofreturntosporttestbatterieswithandwithoutpsychologicalprosontheriskofasecondaclinjuryacriticalassessmentoffourdifferenttestbatteries |