Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative wound infection rate, newborn effect and, the effect of skin to peritoneum incision time between diathermy and scalpel for the operation time during primer cesarean section cases. Study Design: A retrospective study was carried out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esra Isci Bostanci, Ismail Guler, Funda Cevher Akdulum, Mehmet Anil Onan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Network 2020-12-01
Series:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/921
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823857400759713792
author Esra Isci Bostanci
Ismail Guler
Funda Cevher Akdulum
Mehmet Anil Onan
author_facet Esra Isci Bostanci
Ismail Guler
Funda Cevher Akdulum
Mehmet Anil Onan
author_sort Esra Isci Bostanci
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative wound infection rate, newborn effect and, the effect of skin to peritoneum incision time between diathermy and scalpel for the operation time during primer cesarean section cases. Study Design: A retrospective study was carried out at Gazi University Hospital. A total of 74 patients met inclusion criteria in this study but 6 patients were excluded in electrocautery group for not to come controls, group I patients, n=37, underwent operation via scalpel incision and group II patients, n=31, underwent operation by diathermy incision. The main outcome measures were the operation time, postoperative wound infection rate, scar character, neonatal Apgar scores, and need of neonatal intensive care unit. Results: There were no significant differences between newborn Apgar scores (1st and 5th minutes), wound infections, and operation times (p=0.35, p=0.69, p=0.32, respectively). Conclusion: Related to findings, it could be suggested that diathermy might be an alternative to the scalpel in Pfannenstiel incisions contrary to the old belief about its high infection rates.
format Article
id doaj-art-167dd010a9e045418bf867fdf819477d
institution Kabale University
issn 1300-4751
2602-4918
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Medical Network
record_format Article
series Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
spelling doaj-art-167dd010a9e045418bf867fdf819477d2025-02-11T21:10:43ZengMedical NetworkGynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine1300-47512602-49182020-12-0126310.21613/GORM.2019.921Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal OutcomesEsra Isci Bostanci0Ismail Guler1Funda Cevher Akdulum2Mehmet Anil Onan3The department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Women’s Health Training and Research HospitalThe department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital, AnkaraThe department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital, Ankara,The department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital, Ankara Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative wound infection rate, newborn effect and, the effect of skin to peritoneum incision time between diathermy and scalpel for the operation time during primer cesarean section cases. Study Design: A retrospective study was carried out at Gazi University Hospital. A total of 74 patients met inclusion criteria in this study but 6 patients were excluded in electrocautery group for not to come controls, group I patients, n=37, underwent operation via scalpel incision and group II patients, n=31, underwent operation by diathermy incision. The main outcome measures were the operation time, postoperative wound infection rate, scar character, neonatal Apgar scores, and need of neonatal intensive care unit. Results: There were no significant differences between newborn Apgar scores (1st and 5th minutes), wound infections, and operation times (p=0.35, p=0.69, p=0.32, respectively). Conclusion: Related to findings, it could be suggested that diathermy might be an alternative to the scalpel in Pfannenstiel incisions contrary to the old belief about its high infection rates. https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/921DiathermyNeonatal apgar scoresPrimary cesarean sectionScalpelWound infection
spellingShingle Esra Isci Bostanci
Ismail Guler
Funda Cevher Akdulum
Mehmet Anil Onan
Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes
Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
Diathermy
Neonatal apgar scores
Primary cesarean section
Scalpel
Wound infection
title Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes
title_full Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes
title_fullStr Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes
title_short Electrocautery Versus Scalpel in Women Undergoing Primary Cesarean Section and Neonatal Outcomes
title_sort electrocautery versus scalpel in women undergoing primary cesarean section and neonatal outcomes
topic Diathermy
Neonatal apgar scores
Primary cesarean section
Scalpel
Wound infection
url https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/921
work_keys_str_mv AT esraiscibostanci electrocauteryversusscalpelinwomenundergoingprimarycesareansectionandneonataloutcomes
AT ismailguler electrocauteryversusscalpelinwomenundergoingprimarycesareansectionandneonataloutcomes
AT fundacevherakdulum electrocauteryversusscalpelinwomenundergoingprimarycesareansectionandneonataloutcomes
AT mehmetanilonan electrocauteryversusscalpelinwomenundergoingprimarycesareansectionandneonataloutcomes