Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
Introduction: Spinning is an indoor stationary cycling programme that can cause severe rhabdomyolysis. We compared the clinical characteristics of spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis (SER) with other exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) and non-exertional rhabdomyolysis (NER). Methods: This was a r...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Singapore Medical Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021116 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823861011831062528 |
---|---|
author | Kashyap Shroff Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren Kunzang Norbu Eunizar Omar |
author_facet | Kashyap Shroff Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren Kunzang Norbu Eunizar Omar |
author_sort | Kashyap Shroff |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction:
Spinning is an indoor stationary cycling programme that can cause severe rhabdomyolysis. We compared the clinical characteristics of spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis (SER) with other exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) and non-exertional rhabdomyolysis (NER).
Methods:
This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients presenting with rhabdomyolysis to an emergency department from August 2018 to August 2019. Patients were classified as SER, ER or NER based on chart review. We compared patient demographics, serum creatine kinase (CK), transaminase and creatinine levels, admission rates, duration of hospitalisation and treatment prescribed.
Results:
62 patients were analysed. SER patients were predominantly female (77% vs. 24% vs. 26%, P < 0.01), Chinese (100% vs. 47% vs. 79%, P < 0.01) and younger (mean age 27.7 vs. 34.6 vs. 59.4 years, P < 0.01) than those with ER and NER. The SER group had the highest CK level (20,000 vs. 10,465 vs. 6,007 U/L, P < 0.01) but the lowest mean serum creatinine level (53.5 vs. 80.9 vs. 143.5 mmol/L, P < 0.01) compared to the ER and NER groups. Admission rates were the highest in SER patients (100% vs. 57% vs. 90%, P < 0.01). SER mean inpatient length of stay was longer than ER but shorter than NER patients (4.3 vs. 1.9 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.02).
Conclusion:
SER is a unique form of rhabdomyolysis. Predominantly seen in young, healthy women, it often presents with extremely high CK levels. However, the prognosis is good and the rate of complication is low with fluid treatment. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-18f2e2cdeb8b4acdb198a696b48e39c3 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0037-5675 2737-5935 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Singapore Medical Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-18f2e2cdeb8b4acdb198a696b48e39c32025-02-10T05:31:31ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352022-10-01631056757110.11622/smedj.2021116Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative studyKashyap ShroffMoganapriya d/o GunasegarenKunzang NorbuEunizar OmarIntroduction: Spinning is an indoor stationary cycling programme that can cause severe rhabdomyolysis. We compared the clinical characteristics of spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis (SER) with other exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) and non-exertional rhabdomyolysis (NER). Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients presenting with rhabdomyolysis to an emergency department from August 2018 to August 2019. Patients were classified as SER, ER or NER based on chart review. We compared patient demographics, serum creatine kinase (CK), transaminase and creatinine levels, admission rates, duration of hospitalisation and treatment prescribed. Results: 62 patients were analysed. SER patients were predominantly female (77% vs. 24% vs. 26%, P < 0.01), Chinese (100% vs. 47% vs. 79%, P < 0.01) and younger (mean age 27.7 vs. 34.6 vs. 59.4 years, P < 0.01) than those with ER and NER. The SER group had the highest CK level (20,000 vs. 10,465 vs. 6,007 U/L, P < 0.01) but the lowest mean serum creatinine level (53.5 vs. 80.9 vs. 143.5 mmol/L, P < 0.01) compared to the ER and NER groups. Admission rates were the highest in SER patients (100% vs. 57% vs. 90%, P < 0.01). SER mean inpatient length of stay was longer than ER but shorter than NER patients (4.3 vs. 1.9 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.02). Conclusion: SER is a unique form of rhabdomyolysis. Predominantly seen in young, healthy women, it often presents with extremely high CK levels. However, the prognosis is good and the rate of complication is low with fluid treatment.https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021116exertionalrhabdomyolysisspinning |
spellingShingle | Kashyap Shroff Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren Kunzang Norbu Eunizar Omar Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study Singapore Medical Journal exertional rhabdomyolysis spinning |
title | Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study |
title_full | Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study |
title_short | Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study |
title_sort | clinical characteristics of spinning induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis a comparative study |
topic | exertional rhabdomyolysis spinning |
url | https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kashyapshroff clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy AT moganapriyadogunasegaren clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy AT kunzangnorbu clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy AT eunizaromar clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy |