Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study

Introduction: Spinning is an indoor stationary cycling programme that can cause severe rhabdomyolysis. We compared the clinical characteristics of spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis (SER) with other exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) and non-exertional rhabdomyolysis (NER). Methods: This was a r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kashyap Shroff, Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren, Kunzang Norbu, Eunizar Omar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications 2022-10-01
Series:Singapore Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021116
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861011831062528
author Kashyap Shroff
Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren
Kunzang Norbu
Eunizar Omar
author_facet Kashyap Shroff
Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren
Kunzang Norbu
Eunizar Omar
author_sort Kashyap Shroff
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Spinning is an indoor stationary cycling programme that can cause severe rhabdomyolysis. We compared the clinical characteristics of spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis (SER) with other exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) and non-exertional rhabdomyolysis (NER). Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients presenting with rhabdomyolysis to an emergency department from August 2018 to August 2019. Patients were classified as SER, ER or NER based on chart review. We compared patient demographics, serum creatine kinase (CK), transaminase and creatinine levels, admission rates, duration of hospitalisation and treatment prescribed. Results: 62 patients were analysed. SER patients were predominantly female (77% vs. 24% vs. 26%, P < 0.01), Chinese (100% vs. 47% vs. 79%, P < 0.01) and younger (mean age 27.7 vs. 34.6 vs. 59.4 years, P < 0.01) than those with ER and NER. The SER group had the highest CK level (20,000 vs. 10,465 vs. 6,007 U/L, P < 0.01) but the lowest mean serum creatinine level (53.5 vs. 80.9 vs. 143.5 mmol/L, P < 0.01) compared to the ER and NER groups. Admission rates were the highest in SER patients (100% vs. 57% vs. 90%, P < 0.01). SER mean inpatient length of stay was longer than ER but shorter than NER patients (4.3 vs. 1.9 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.02). Conclusion: SER is a unique form of rhabdomyolysis. Predominantly seen in young, healthy women, it often presents with extremely high CK levels. However, the prognosis is good and the rate of complication is low with fluid treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-18f2e2cdeb8b4acdb198a696b48e39c3
institution Kabale University
issn 0037-5675
2737-5935
language English
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Singapore Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-18f2e2cdeb8b4acdb198a696b48e39c32025-02-10T05:31:31ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352022-10-01631056757110.11622/smedj.2021116Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative studyKashyap ShroffMoganapriya d/o GunasegarenKunzang NorbuEunizar OmarIntroduction: Spinning is an indoor stationary cycling programme that can cause severe rhabdomyolysis. We compared the clinical characteristics of spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis (SER) with other exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) and non-exertional rhabdomyolysis (NER). Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients presenting with rhabdomyolysis to an emergency department from August 2018 to August 2019. Patients were classified as SER, ER or NER based on chart review. We compared patient demographics, serum creatine kinase (CK), transaminase and creatinine levels, admission rates, duration of hospitalisation and treatment prescribed. Results: 62 patients were analysed. SER patients were predominantly female (77% vs. 24% vs. 26%, P < 0.01), Chinese (100% vs. 47% vs. 79%, P < 0.01) and younger (mean age 27.7 vs. 34.6 vs. 59.4 years, P < 0.01) than those with ER and NER. The SER group had the highest CK level (20,000 vs. 10,465 vs. 6,007 U/L, P < 0.01) but the lowest mean serum creatinine level (53.5 vs. 80.9 vs. 143.5 mmol/L, P < 0.01) compared to the ER and NER groups. Admission rates were the highest in SER patients (100% vs. 57% vs. 90%, P < 0.01). SER mean inpatient length of stay was longer than ER but shorter than NER patients (4.3 vs. 1.9 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.02). Conclusion: SER is a unique form of rhabdomyolysis. Predominantly seen in young, healthy women, it often presents with extremely high CK levels. However, the prognosis is good and the rate of complication is low with fluid treatment.https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021116exertionalrhabdomyolysisspinning
spellingShingle Kashyap Shroff
Moganapriya d/o Gunasegaren
Kunzang Norbu
Eunizar Omar
Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
Singapore Medical Journal
exertional
rhabdomyolysis
spinning
title Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
title_full Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
title_fullStr Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
title_short Clinical characteristics of spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis: a comparative study
title_sort clinical characteristics of spinning induced rhabdomyolysis and other causes of rhabdomyolysis a comparative study
topic exertional
rhabdomyolysis
spinning
url https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2021116
work_keys_str_mv AT kashyapshroff clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy
AT moganapriyadogunasegaren clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy
AT kunzangnorbu clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy
AT eunizaromar clinicalcharacteristicsofspinninginducedrhabdomyolysisandothercausesofrhabdomyolysisacomparativestudy