From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy

The theoretical paper tapped into Bernstein’s notion of weak framing to point out the ambivalence of the religious curriculum in Zimbabwe. It showed the curriculum terrain that Religious Education has undergone and predicted its future. It also showed how curriculum conversations have moved the “whi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bekithemba Dube
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Noyam Journals 2024-11-01
Series:E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ERATS202410116.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860552424751104
author Bekithemba Dube
author_facet Bekithemba Dube
author_sort Bekithemba Dube
collection DOAJ
description The theoretical paper tapped into Bernstein’s notion of weak framing to point out the ambivalence of the religious curriculum in Zimbabwe. It showed the curriculum terrain that Religious Education has undergone and predicted its future. It also showed how curriculum conversations have moved the “which religions” question to why not religions in the curriculum. The paper argued that the weak framing of the religious curriculum presents itself as a playing field for politicians, curriculum planners, and educators where its validity is not to benefit the learners but to push the propaganda of the ZANU PF regime. The paper concludes, arguing that the presence of the religious curriculum has always been to buttress the status quo of the oppressor and the oppressed. Rejuvenation of the field is necessary, and urgent so that learners are not deprived of the benefits associated with the RE curriculum.
format Article
id doaj-art-199c4afe999d460dabf43cf4760f6fb1
institution Kabale University
issn 2458-7338
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Noyam Journals
record_format Article
series E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies
spelling doaj-art-199c4afe999d460dabf43cf4760f6fb12025-02-10T12:16:45ZengNoyam JournalsE-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies2458-73382024-11-0110116573https://doi.org/10.38159/erats.202410116From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled PedagogyBekithemba Dube0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-7838 Centre for Diversity in Higher Education, Central University of Technology, South Africa.The theoretical paper tapped into Bernstein’s notion of weak framing to point out the ambivalence of the religious curriculum in Zimbabwe. It showed the curriculum terrain that Religious Education has undergone and predicted its future. It also showed how curriculum conversations have moved the “which religions” question to why not religions in the curriculum. The paper argued that the weak framing of the religious curriculum presents itself as a playing field for politicians, curriculum planners, and educators where its validity is not to benefit the learners but to push the propaganda of the ZANU PF regime. The paper concludes, arguing that the presence of the religious curriculum has always been to buttress the status quo of the oppressor and the oppressed. Rejuvenation of the field is necessary, and urgent so that learners are not deprived of the benefits associated with the RE curriculum.https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ERATS202410116.pdfreligious educationbernstein theoryreligions
spellingShingle Bekithemba Dube
From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy
E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies
religious education
bernstein theory
religions
title From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy
title_full From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy
title_fullStr From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy
title_full_unstemmed From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy
title_short From Which to Why Not Religions in the Curriculum. A Troubled Pedagogy
title_sort from which to why not religions in the curriculum a troubled pedagogy
topic religious education
bernstein theory
religions
url https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ERATS202410116.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bekithembadube fromwhichtowhynotreligionsinthecurriculumatroubledpedagogy