Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features

In the recent decades the interpersonal nature of written academic communication has been widely studied in various linguistic/cultural contexts, including Lithuanian. To gain new insights into how knowledge is negotiated interpersonally in Lithuanian scientific texts, the present paper explores th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Ruskan, Greta Maslauskienė
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University 2024-01-01
Series:Kalbotyra
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/32251
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823857887023202304
author Anna Ruskan
Greta Maslauskienė
author_facet Anna Ruskan
Greta Maslauskienė
author_sort Anna Ruskan
collection DOAJ
description In the recent decades the interpersonal nature of written academic communication has been widely studied in various linguistic/cultural contexts, including Lithuanian. To gain new insights into how knowledge is negotiated interpersonally in Lithuanian scientific texts, the present paper explores the distribution and use of interactive and interactional features of metadiscourse in Lithuanian research articles in a single discipline, i.e., linguistics. For the classification of metadiscourse resources, the study employs the interpersonal model of metadiscourse (Hyland 2005a). Based on the analysis of 30 Lithuanian research articles in the field of linguistics, this exploratory investigation reveals rhetorical strategies utilized by professional authors to construct a coherent text and engage their audiences in the chosen disciplinary domain. The dominance of interactive metadiscourse features over interactional ones in the corpus examined shows that Lithuanian authors of research articles in linguistics are generally more concerned with organizing discourse and guiding readers through the text than with expressing attitudes and commitment to their arguments. The most common interactive resources are transitions and evidentials, and the most frequent interactional devices include boosters, engagement markers, and hedges. The analysis offers a number of methodological steps necessary for applying the interpersonal model of metadiscourse to Lithuanian data, and complements numerous investigations into Lithuanian academic discourse by illustrating and discussing the writer-reader interaction in linguistics in a larger corpus.
format Article
id doaj-art-1cf66b34275b4efcbc26180a31abaf68
institution Kabale University
issn 1392-1517
2029-8315
language deu
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Vilnius University
record_format Article
series Kalbotyra
spelling doaj-art-1cf66b34275b4efcbc26180a31abaf682025-02-11T18:09:28ZdeuVilnius UniversityKalbotyra1392-15172029-83152024-01-017610.15388/Kalbotyra.2023.76.6Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional featuresAnna Ruskan0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0075Greta Maslauskienė1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5319-385XVilnius University, LithuaniaVilnius University, Lithuania In the recent decades the interpersonal nature of written academic communication has been widely studied in various linguistic/cultural contexts, including Lithuanian. To gain new insights into how knowledge is negotiated interpersonally in Lithuanian scientific texts, the present paper explores the distribution and use of interactive and interactional features of metadiscourse in Lithuanian research articles in a single discipline, i.e., linguistics. For the classification of metadiscourse resources, the study employs the interpersonal model of metadiscourse (Hyland 2005a). Based on the analysis of 30 Lithuanian research articles in the field of linguistics, this exploratory investigation reveals rhetorical strategies utilized by professional authors to construct a coherent text and engage their audiences in the chosen disciplinary domain. The dominance of interactive metadiscourse features over interactional ones in the corpus examined shows that Lithuanian authors of research articles in linguistics are generally more concerned with organizing discourse and guiding readers through the text than with expressing attitudes and commitment to their arguments. The most common interactive resources are transitions and evidentials, and the most frequent interactional devices include boosters, engagement markers, and hedges. The analysis offers a number of methodological steps necessary for applying the interpersonal model of metadiscourse to Lithuanian data, and complements numerous investigations into Lithuanian academic discourse by illustrating and discussing the writer-reader interaction in linguistics in a larger corpus. https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/32251metadiscourseinteractiveinteractionallinguisticsresearch articleLithuanian
spellingShingle Anna Ruskan
Greta Maslauskienė
Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
Kalbotyra
metadiscourse
interactive
interactional
linguistics
research article
Lithuanian
title Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
title_full Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
title_fullStr Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
title_full_unstemmed Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
title_short Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
title_sort metadiscourse in lithuanian linguistics research articles a study of interactive and interactional features
topic metadiscourse
interactive
interactional
linguistics
research article
Lithuanian
url https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/32251
work_keys_str_mv AT annaruskan metadiscourseinlithuanianlinguisticsresearcharticlesastudyofinteractiveandinteractionalfeatures
AT gretamaslauskiene metadiscourseinlithuanianlinguisticsresearcharticlesastudyofinteractiveandinteractionalfeatures