Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features
In the recent decades the interpersonal nature of written academic communication has been widely studied in various linguistic/cultural contexts, including Lithuanian. To gain new insights into how knowledge is negotiated interpersonally in Lithuanian scientific texts, the present paper explores th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Vilnius University
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Kalbotyra |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/32251 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823857887023202304 |
---|---|
author | Anna Ruskan Greta Maslauskienė |
author_facet | Anna Ruskan Greta Maslauskienė |
author_sort | Anna Ruskan |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
In the recent decades the interpersonal nature of written academic communication has been widely studied in various linguistic/cultural contexts, including Lithuanian. To gain new insights into how knowledge is negotiated interpersonally in Lithuanian scientific texts, the present paper explores the distribution and use of interactive and interactional features of metadiscourse in Lithuanian research articles in a single discipline, i.e., linguistics. For the classification of metadiscourse resources, the study employs the interpersonal model of metadiscourse (Hyland 2005a). Based on the analysis of 30 Lithuanian research articles in the field of linguistics, this exploratory investigation reveals rhetorical strategies utilized by professional authors to construct a coherent text and engage their audiences in the chosen disciplinary domain. The dominance of interactive metadiscourse features over interactional ones in the corpus examined shows that Lithuanian authors of research articles in linguistics are generally more concerned with organizing discourse and guiding readers through the text than with expressing attitudes and commitment to their arguments. The most common interactive resources are transitions and evidentials, and the most frequent interactional devices include boosters, engagement markers, and hedges. The analysis offers a number of methodological steps necessary for applying the interpersonal model of metadiscourse to Lithuanian data, and complements numerous investigations into Lithuanian academic discourse by illustrating and discussing the writer-reader interaction in linguistics in a larger corpus.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1cf66b34275b4efcbc26180a31abaf68 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1392-1517 2029-8315 |
language | deu |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Vilnius University |
record_format | Article |
series | Kalbotyra |
spelling | doaj-art-1cf66b34275b4efcbc26180a31abaf682025-02-11T18:09:28ZdeuVilnius UniversityKalbotyra1392-15172029-83152024-01-017610.15388/Kalbotyra.2023.76.6Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional featuresAnna Ruskan0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0075Greta Maslauskienė1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5319-385XVilnius University, LithuaniaVilnius University, Lithuania In the recent decades the interpersonal nature of written academic communication has been widely studied in various linguistic/cultural contexts, including Lithuanian. To gain new insights into how knowledge is negotiated interpersonally in Lithuanian scientific texts, the present paper explores the distribution and use of interactive and interactional features of metadiscourse in Lithuanian research articles in a single discipline, i.e., linguistics. For the classification of metadiscourse resources, the study employs the interpersonal model of metadiscourse (Hyland 2005a). Based on the analysis of 30 Lithuanian research articles in the field of linguistics, this exploratory investigation reveals rhetorical strategies utilized by professional authors to construct a coherent text and engage their audiences in the chosen disciplinary domain. The dominance of interactive metadiscourse features over interactional ones in the corpus examined shows that Lithuanian authors of research articles in linguistics are generally more concerned with organizing discourse and guiding readers through the text than with expressing attitudes and commitment to their arguments. The most common interactive resources are transitions and evidentials, and the most frequent interactional devices include boosters, engagement markers, and hedges. The analysis offers a number of methodological steps necessary for applying the interpersonal model of metadiscourse to Lithuanian data, and complements numerous investigations into Lithuanian academic discourse by illustrating and discussing the writer-reader interaction in linguistics in a larger corpus. https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/32251metadiscourseinteractiveinteractionallinguisticsresearch articleLithuanian |
spellingShingle | Anna Ruskan Greta Maslauskienė Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features Kalbotyra metadiscourse interactive interactional linguistics research article Lithuanian |
title | Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features |
title_full | Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features |
title_fullStr | Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features |
title_full_unstemmed | Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features |
title_short | Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features |
title_sort | metadiscourse in lithuanian linguistics research articles a study of interactive and interactional features |
topic | metadiscourse interactive interactional linguistics research article Lithuanian |
url | https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/32251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annaruskan metadiscourseinlithuanianlinguisticsresearcharticlesastudyofinteractiveandinteractionalfeatures AT gretamaslauskiene metadiscourseinlithuanianlinguisticsresearcharticlesastudyofinteractiveandinteractionalfeatures |