Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System

# Background Post-performance verbal and visual feedback based on data collected via lab-based instruments have been shown to improve landing patterns related to non-contact ACL injury. Biomechanical methods are often complex, difficult to transport and utilize in field settings, and costly, which l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas W Kernozek, Drew Rutherford, Becky Heinert, Jessica Onsager, Maria Lee, Jeremie Schiedermayer, Stephanie Dietrich, Renee Dade, Thomas Gus Almonroeder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2021-02-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18808
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825196996198137856
author Thomas W Kernozek
Drew Rutherford
Becky Heinert
Jessica Onsager
Maria Lee
Jeremie Schiedermayer
Stephanie Dietrich
Renee Dade
Thomas Gus Almonroeder
author_facet Thomas W Kernozek
Drew Rutherford
Becky Heinert
Jessica Onsager
Maria Lee
Jeremie Schiedermayer
Stephanie Dietrich
Renee Dade
Thomas Gus Almonroeder
author_sort Thomas W Kernozek
collection DOAJ
description # Background Post-performance verbal and visual feedback based on data collected via lab-based instruments have been shown to improve landing patterns related to non-contact ACL injury. Biomechanical methods are often complex, difficult to transport and utilize in field settings, and costly, which limits their use for injury prevention. Developing systems that can readily provide feedback outside of the lab setting may support large scale use of feedback training for ACL injury prevention. # Purpose/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a single training session using a custom portable feedback training system that provides performance cues to promote changes in impact kinetics and lower extremity position during landing in female athletes. # Study Design Repeated measures # Methods One hundred fifty female athletes (ages 13-18 years old) landed from a 50 cm platform with and without feedback related to vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), vGRF symmetry and lower extremity position. Feedback was provided via a portable, low-cost system that included two custom-built force plates interfaced with a digital camera. Each athlete performed six pre-test trials followed by two blocks of six trials where they received visual feedback from the training system and individualized verbal cues from an investigator. Following training blocks, athletes completed six post-test trials without feedback and then six dual-task trials where a ball was randomly thrown to the performer during the landing (transfer task). vGRF and knee to ankle (K:A) separation ratio were measured and the average responses were reported for each trial block. # Results Differences in vGRF between baseline, post-test and transfer task trial blocks were observed (F(2,298)=181.68, p < .0001). Mean (SD) peak vGRF (body weight) were 4.43 (0.90), 3.28 (0.61), and 3.80 (0.92), respectively. Differences in K:A ratio between baseline, post-test and transfer task trial blocks were shown (F(2,298)=68.47, p < .0001). Mean (SD) K:A ratio were 0.87 (0.21), 0.98 (0.19), and 0.92 (0.19), respectively. # Conclusion A portable feedback system may be effective in reducing peak vGRFs and promoting a more desirable K:A ratio during landing and transfer task landing in adolescent female athletes. # Level of Evidence 3b
format Article
id doaj-art-20dc70b38e5f4443b2aaa4a7224e3e1a
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-20dc70b38e5f4443b2aaa4a7224e3e1a2025-02-11T20:27:40ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962021-02-01161Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback SystemThomas W KernozekDrew RutherfordBecky HeinertJessica OnsagerMaria LeeJeremie SchiedermayerStephanie DietrichRenee DadeThomas Gus Almonroeder# Background Post-performance verbal and visual feedback based on data collected via lab-based instruments have been shown to improve landing patterns related to non-contact ACL injury. Biomechanical methods are often complex, difficult to transport and utilize in field settings, and costly, which limits their use for injury prevention. Developing systems that can readily provide feedback outside of the lab setting may support large scale use of feedback training for ACL injury prevention. # Purpose/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a single training session using a custom portable feedback training system that provides performance cues to promote changes in impact kinetics and lower extremity position during landing in female athletes. # Study Design Repeated measures # Methods One hundred fifty female athletes (ages 13-18 years old) landed from a 50 cm platform with and without feedback related to vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), vGRF symmetry and lower extremity position. Feedback was provided via a portable, low-cost system that included two custom-built force plates interfaced with a digital camera. Each athlete performed six pre-test trials followed by two blocks of six trials where they received visual feedback from the training system and individualized verbal cues from an investigator. Following training blocks, athletes completed six post-test trials without feedback and then six dual-task trials where a ball was randomly thrown to the performer during the landing (transfer task). vGRF and knee to ankle (K:A) separation ratio were measured and the average responses were reported for each trial block. # Results Differences in vGRF between baseline, post-test and transfer task trial blocks were observed (F(2,298)=181.68, p < .0001). Mean (SD) peak vGRF (body weight) were 4.43 (0.90), 3.28 (0.61), and 3.80 (0.92), respectively. Differences in K:A ratio between baseline, post-test and transfer task trial blocks were shown (F(2,298)=68.47, p < .0001). Mean (SD) K:A ratio were 0.87 (0.21), 0.98 (0.19), and 0.92 (0.19), respectively. # Conclusion A portable feedback system may be effective in reducing peak vGRFs and promoting a more desirable K:A ratio during landing and transfer task landing in adolescent female athletes. # Level of Evidence 3bhttps://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18808
spellingShingle Thomas W Kernozek
Drew Rutherford
Becky Heinert
Jessica Onsager
Maria Lee
Jeremie Schiedermayer
Stephanie Dietrich
Renee Dade
Thomas Gus Almonroeder
Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System
title_full Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System
title_fullStr Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System
title_full_unstemmed Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System
title_short Post-Trial Feedback Alters Landing Performance in Adolescent Female Athletes Using a Portable Feedback System
title_sort post trial feedback alters landing performance in adolescent female athletes using a portable feedback system
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18808
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaswkernozek posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT drewrutherford posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT beckyheinert posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT jessicaonsager posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT marialee posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT jeremieschiedermayer posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT stephaniedietrich posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT reneedade posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem
AT thomasgusalmonroeder posttrialfeedbackalterslandingperformanceinadolescentfemaleathletesusingaportablefeedbacksystem