The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
This study estimates water consumption in two lithium mines (Olaroz and Fénix) that use different extraction technologies in Argentina's salt flats. Based on Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), we assess the water footprint (WF) and brine consumption (BC) in both mines. To the best of our know...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Heliyon |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402500903X |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823856722473648128 |
---|---|
author | Walter Fernando Díaz Paz Lucas Seghezzo Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza Melisa Escosteguy Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado Eduardo Kruse Marc Hufty Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray |
author_facet | Walter Fernando Díaz Paz Lucas Seghezzo Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza Melisa Escosteguy Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado Eduardo Kruse Marc Hufty Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray |
author_sort | Walter Fernando Díaz Paz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study estimates water consumption in two lithium mines (Olaroz and Fénix) that use different extraction technologies in Argentina's salt flats. Based on Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), we assess the water footprint (WF) and brine consumption (BC) in both mines. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate WF and BC for lithium extraction and provides data to assess water consumption and better understand its implications for local ecosystems and communities. We also contextualize freshwater consumption in lithium extraction projects by estimating the blue water intensity (WIblue) and the population equivalent (PE), namely the number of local inhabitants that would consume an equivalent volume of water. Total WF was 51.0 and 135.5 m3/ton of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) for Olaroz and Fénix, respectively. Per unit of product, WF was 2.7 times higher in Fénix but BC was higher in Olaroz. WIblue indicates that, while Fénix had a higher WFblue, its impact on local blue water availability is moderate due to greater local water availability. WFblue in Olaroz and Fénix was equivalent to the water consumption of 32,238 and 141,047 inhabitants of their nearest towns (Susques and Antofagasta de la Sierra, respectively, both with a current population of less than 2,100 inhabitants). Our findings underscore that the water consumption of lithium mining can have important impacts that vary significantly with geographic context. EIRs provide a useful basis for estimating WF and BC, though certain limitations and challenges persist, particularly regarding incomplete or insufficiently detailed data. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-217a68570eda4b2fba35c229bd4f1d53 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2405-8440 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Heliyon |
spelling | doaj-art-217a68570eda4b2fba35c229bd4f1d532025-02-12T05:31:25ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402025-02-01114e42523The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flatsWalter Fernando Díaz Paz0Lucas Seghezzo1Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza2Melisa Escosteguy3Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado4Eduardo Kruse5Marc Hufty6Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray7Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaUNSa, Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaCentro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIT-NOBA), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), Casco Urbano, B1900, La Plata, Provincia de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaCentre for International Environmental Studies, Geneva Graduate Institute, 2 Ch. Eugene-Rigot, CH1211, Geneva, SwitzerlandConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, Argentina; Corresponding author.This study estimates water consumption in two lithium mines (Olaroz and Fénix) that use different extraction technologies in Argentina's salt flats. Based on Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), we assess the water footprint (WF) and brine consumption (BC) in both mines. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate WF and BC for lithium extraction and provides data to assess water consumption and better understand its implications for local ecosystems and communities. We also contextualize freshwater consumption in lithium extraction projects by estimating the blue water intensity (WIblue) and the population equivalent (PE), namely the number of local inhabitants that would consume an equivalent volume of water. Total WF was 51.0 and 135.5 m3/ton of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) for Olaroz and Fénix, respectively. Per unit of product, WF was 2.7 times higher in Fénix but BC was higher in Olaroz. WIblue indicates that, while Fénix had a higher WFblue, its impact on local blue water availability is moderate due to greater local water availability. WFblue in Olaroz and Fénix was equivalent to the water consumption of 32,238 and 141,047 inhabitants of their nearest towns (Susques and Antofagasta de la Sierra, respectively, both with a current population of less than 2,100 inhabitants). Our findings underscore that the water consumption of lithium mining can have important impacts that vary significantly with geographic context. EIRs provide a useful basis for estimating WF and BC, though certain limitations and challenges persist, particularly regarding incomplete or insufficiently detailed data.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402500903XBrine consumptionFreshwater consumptionLithium extractionPopulation equivalentWater footprint |
spellingShingle | Walter Fernando Díaz Paz Lucas Seghezzo Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza Melisa Escosteguy Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado Eduardo Kruse Marc Hufty Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats Heliyon Brine consumption Freshwater consumption Lithium extraction Population equivalent Water footprint |
title | The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats |
title_full | The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats |
title_fullStr | The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats |
title_full_unstemmed | The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats |
title_short | The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats |
title_sort | water footprint of lithium extraction technologies insights from environmental impact reports in argentina s salt flats |
topic | Brine consumption Freshwater consumption Lithium extraction Population equivalent Water footprint |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402500903X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walterfernandodiazpaz thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT lucasseghezzo thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT arielagriseldasalasbarboza thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT melisaescosteguy thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT paulavalentinaariasalvarado thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT eduardokruse thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT marchufty thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT martinalejandroiribarnegaray thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT walterfernandodiazpaz waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT lucasseghezzo waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT arielagriseldasalasbarboza waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT melisaescosteguy waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT paulavalentinaariasalvarado waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT eduardokruse waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT marchufty waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats AT martinalejandroiribarnegaray waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats |