The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats

This study estimates water consumption in two lithium mines (Olaroz and Fénix) that use different extraction technologies in Argentina's salt flats. Based on Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), we assess the water footprint (WF) and brine consumption (BC) in both mines. To the best of our know...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walter Fernando Díaz Paz, Lucas Seghezzo, Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza, Melisa Escosteguy, Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado, Eduardo Kruse, Marc Hufty, Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402500903X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856722473648128
author Walter Fernando Díaz Paz
Lucas Seghezzo
Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza
Melisa Escosteguy
Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado
Eduardo Kruse
Marc Hufty
Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray
author_facet Walter Fernando Díaz Paz
Lucas Seghezzo
Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza
Melisa Escosteguy
Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado
Eduardo Kruse
Marc Hufty
Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray
author_sort Walter Fernando Díaz Paz
collection DOAJ
description This study estimates water consumption in two lithium mines (Olaroz and Fénix) that use different extraction technologies in Argentina's salt flats. Based on Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), we assess the water footprint (WF) and brine consumption (BC) in both mines. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate WF and BC for lithium extraction and provides data to assess water consumption and better understand its implications for local ecosystems and communities. We also contextualize freshwater consumption in lithium extraction projects by estimating the blue water intensity (WIblue) and the population equivalent (PE), namely the number of local inhabitants that would consume an equivalent volume of water. Total WF was 51.0 and 135.5 m3/ton of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) for Olaroz and Fénix, respectively. Per unit of product, WF was 2.7 times higher in Fénix but BC was higher in Olaroz. WIblue indicates that, while Fénix had a higher WFblue, its impact on local blue water availability is moderate due to greater local water availability. WFblue in Olaroz and Fénix was equivalent to the water consumption of 32,238 and 141,047 inhabitants of their nearest towns (Susques and Antofagasta de la Sierra, respectively, both with a current population of less than 2,100 inhabitants). Our findings underscore that the water consumption of lithium mining can have important impacts that vary significantly with geographic context. EIRs provide a useful basis for estimating WF and BC, though certain limitations and challenges persist, particularly regarding incomplete or insufficiently detailed data.
format Article
id doaj-art-217a68570eda4b2fba35c229bd4f1d53
institution Kabale University
issn 2405-8440
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj-art-217a68570eda4b2fba35c229bd4f1d532025-02-12T05:31:25ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402025-02-01114e42523The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flatsWalter Fernando Díaz Paz0Lucas Seghezzo1Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza2Melisa Escosteguy3Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado4Eduardo Kruse5Marc Hufty6Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray7Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaUNSa, Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, ArgentinaCentro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIT-NOBA), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), Casco Urbano, B1900, La Plata, Provincia de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaCentre for International Environmental Studies, Geneva Graduate Institute, 2 Ch. Eugene-Rigot, CH1211, Geneva, SwitzerlandConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Avenida Bolivia 5140, A4408FVY, Salta, Argentina; Corresponding author.This study estimates water consumption in two lithium mines (Olaroz and Fénix) that use different extraction technologies in Argentina's salt flats. Based on Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), we assess the water footprint (WF) and brine consumption (BC) in both mines. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate WF and BC for lithium extraction and provides data to assess water consumption and better understand its implications for local ecosystems and communities. We also contextualize freshwater consumption in lithium extraction projects by estimating the blue water intensity (WIblue) and the population equivalent (PE), namely the number of local inhabitants that would consume an equivalent volume of water. Total WF was 51.0 and 135.5 m3/ton of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) for Olaroz and Fénix, respectively. Per unit of product, WF was 2.7 times higher in Fénix but BC was higher in Olaroz. WIblue indicates that, while Fénix had a higher WFblue, its impact on local blue water availability is moderate due to greater local water availability. WFblue in Olaroz and Fénix was equivalent to the water consumption of 32,238 and 141,047 inhabitants of their nearest towns (Susques and Antofagasta de la Sierra, respectively, both with a current population of less than 2,100 inhabitants). Our findings underscore that the water consumption of lithium mining can have important impacts that vary significantly with geographic context. EIRs provide a useful basis for estimating WF and BC, though certain limitations and challenges persist, particularly regarding incomplete or insufficiently detailed data.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402500903XBrine consumptionFreshwater consumptionLithium extractionPopulation equivalentWater footprint
spellingShingle Walter Fernando Díaz Paz
Lucas Seghezzo
Ariela Griselda Salas Barboza
Melisa Escosteguy
Paula Valentina Arias-Alvarado
Eduardo Kruse
Marc Hufty
Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray
The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
Heliyon
Brine consumption
Freshwater consumption
Lithium extraction
Population equivalent
Water footprint
title The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
title_full The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
title_fullStr The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
title_full_unstemmed The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
title_short The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats
title_sort water footprint of lithium extraction technologies insights from environmental impact reports in argentina s salt flats
topic Brine consumption
Freshwater consumption
Lithium extraction
Population equivalent
Water footprint
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402500903X
work_keys_str_mv AT walterfernandodiazpaz thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT lucasseghezzo thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT arielagriseldasalasbarboza thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT melisaescosteguy thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT paulavalentinaariasalvarado thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT eduardokruse thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT marchufty thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT martinalejandroiribarnegaray thewaterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT walterfernandodiazpaz waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT lucasseghezzo waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT arielagriseldasalasbarboza waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT melisaescosteguy waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT paulavalentinaariasalvarado waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT eduardokruse waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT marchufty waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats
AT martinalejandroiribarnegaray waterfootprintoflithiumextractiontechnologiesinsightsfromenvironmentalimpactreportsinargentinassaltflats