Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking

Abstract The nature and frequency of spontaneous thoughts play a critical role in cognitive processes like perception, decision-making, attention, and memory. Deficits in these processes are also greatly associated with the development and maintenance of psychopathology. However, the underlying cogn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Migó, Jessica A. Cooper, Philip A. Kragel, Michael T. Treadway
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Communications Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00201-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861622650699776
author Marta Migó
Jessica A. Cooper
Philip A. Kragel
Michael T. Treadway
author_facet Marta Migó
Jessica A. Cooper
Philip A. Kragel
Michael T. Treadway
author_sort Marta Migó
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The nature and frequency of spontaneous thoughts play a critical role in cognitive processes like perception, decision-making, attention, and memory. Deficits in these processes are also greatly associated with the development and maintenance of psychopathology. However, the underlying cognitive dynamics of free and stuck spontaneous thought remain unclear, as these often occur in the absence of measurable behaviors. Here, we analyze free word-association data using attractor-state dynamic modeling, which conceptualizes stuck spontaneous thought as navigating a multidimensional semantic space while in the presence of strong attractor locations. Word-association data was collected from an exploratory sample (N 1 = 65), a first replication sample (N 2 = 79), and, following pre-registration, a second replication sample (N 3 = 222). After the data was embedded into a 3-dimensional semantic space and fit by our dynamic model, unsupervised learning consistently grouped data into four clusters across all independent samples. These clusters were characterized by two distinct patterns of stuck negative thinking, a pattern of protective positive thinking, and a pattern of flexible mind-wandering. Our results support a method for modeling spontaneous thought and isolate distinct sub-types that may not be accessible using retrospective self-report methods. We discuss implications for clinical and cognitive science.
format Article
id doaj-art-2242a1002b614389a9e253ba72f70901
institution Kabale University
issn 2731-9121
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Psychology
spelling doaj-art-2242a1002b614389a9e253ba72f709012025-02-09T12:53:11ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Psychology2731-91212025-02-013111110.1038/s44271-025-00201-0Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinkingMarta Migó0Jessica A. Cooper1Philip A. Kragel2Michael T. Treadway3Emory University, Department of PsychologyEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesEmory University, Department of PsychologyEmory University, Department of PsychologyAbstract The nature and frequency of spontaneous thoughts play a critical role in cognitive processes like perception, decision-making, attention, and memory. Deficits in these processes are also greatly associated with the development and maintenance of psychopathology. However, the underlying cognitive dynamics of free and stuck spontaneous thought remain unclear, as these often occur in the absence of measurable behaviors. Here, we analyze free word-association data using attractor-state dynamic modeling, which conceptualizes stuck spontaneous thought as navigating a multidimensional semantic space while in the presence of strong attractor locations. Word-association data was collected from an exploratory sample (N 1 = 65), a first replication sample (N 2 = 79), and, following pre-registration, a second replication sample (N 3 = 222). After the data was embedded into a 3-dimensional semantic space and fit by our dynamic model, unsupervised learning consistently grouped data into four clusters across all independent samples. These clusters were characterized by two distinct patterns of stuck negative thinking, a pattern of protective positive thinking, and a pattern of flexible mind-wandering. Our results support a method for modeling spontaneous thought and isolate distinct sub-types that may not be accessible using retrospective self-report methods. We discuss implications for clinical and cognitive science.https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00201-0
spellingShingle Marta Migó
Jessica A. Cooper
Philip A. Kragel
Michael T. Treadway
Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking
Communications Psychology
title Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking
title_full Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking
title_fullStr Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking
title_full_unstemmed Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking
title_short Spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative, positive, and flexible thinking
title_sort spontaneous thought separates into clusters of negative positive and flexible thinking
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00201-0
work_keys_str_mv AT martamigo spontaneousthoughtseparatesintoclustersofnegativepositiveandflexiblethinking
AT jessicaacooper spontaneousthoughtseparatesintoclustersofnegativepositiveandflexiblethinking
AT philipakragel spontaneousthoughtseparatesintoclustersofnegativepositiveandflexiblethinking
AT michaelttreadway spontaneousthoughtseparatesintoclustersofnegativepositiveandflexiblethinking