A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care

Introduction Long COVID (LC), an often-debilitating infection-associated chronic condition (IACC), affects millions of people globally. Globally, LC patients struggle to access timely, appropriate care, often experiencing disbelief, misunderstandings or being diverted from healthcare. Few studies ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma-Louise Aveling, Margareth Crisóstomo Portela, Letícia Soares, Bárbara Caldas, Brenda Sabaine, Flora Cornish
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-12-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/9/12/e017017.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206139576385536
author Emma-Louise Aveling
Margareth Crisóstomo Portela
Letícia Soares
Bárbara Caldas
Brenda Sabaine
Flora Cornish
author_facet Emma-Louise Aveling
Margareth Crisóstomo Portela
Letícia Soares
Bárbara Caldas
Brenda Sabaine
Flora Cornish
author_sort Emma-Louise Aveling
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Long COVID (LC), an often-debilitating infection-associated chronic condition (IACC), affects millions of people globally. Globally, LC patients struggle to access timely, appropriate care, often experiencing disbelief, misunderstandings or being diverted from healthcare. Few studies have examined health system factors influencing LC healthcare access, especially in the Global South. Drawing on the concept of candidacy, we examine health system factors influencing access to LC care in Brazil’s public healthcare system (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS) and theorise implications for equitable access to public healthcare for IACCs globally.Methods We conducted a patient-engaged, qualitative study in the city of Rio de Janeiro. 29 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with SUS professionals from administrative leaders to multidisciplinary primary and specialist care staff (November 2022 to July 2023). Verbatim transcripts were analysed using a pragmatic thematic analysis.Results LC patients’ candidacy for care is invisibilised within SUS through multiple, interacting processes. Interplay of an over-burdened health system, prioritisation of resources in response to (flawed) evidence of demand, misalignment of LC patient capacities and demands of navigating fragmented services, complex referral processes, professionals’ lack of LC knowledge and disregard of the severity and morbidity of a chronic condition amid acute demands, led to the under-recognition of LC by healthcare professionals. Professionals’ under-recognition perpetuates administrators’ de-prioritisiation of resources, policies and training necessary to ensure access to appropriate care, creating a cycle of invisibilisation.Conclusion Urgent action to disrupt a cycle of invisibilisation is essential to mitigate patients’ suffering and intensification of inequalities. Disrupting this pernicious cycle requires more than narrow clinical education efforts. Improved surveillance, education, patient involvement, attention to moral injury and building on existing multidisciplinary strengths may enhance access to LC care. Doing so offers wider benefits beyond patients with LC. We call for a paradigm shift in clinical approaches to IACCs.
format Article
id doaj-art-25219f6c70cf4164aff9c2389aa6daaf
institution Kabale University
issn 2059-7908
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Global Health
spelling doaj-art-25219f6c70cf4164aff9c2389aa6daaf2025-02-07T11:30:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082024-12-0191210.1136/bmjgh-2024-017017A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID careEmma-Louise Aveling0Margareth Crisóstomo Portela1Letícia Soares2Bárbara Caldas3Brenda Sabaine4Flora Cornish5Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USAEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilPatient-Led Research Collaborative, Calabasas, California, USAEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilLondon School of Economics & Political Science, London, UKIntroduction Long COVID (LC), an often-debilitating infection-associated chronic condition (IACC), affects millions of people globally. Globally, LC patients struggle to access timely, appropriate care, often experiencing disbelief, misunderstandings or being diverted from healthcare. Few studies have examined health system factors influencing LC healthcare access, especially in the Global South. Drawing on the concept of candidacy, we examine health system factors influencing access to LC care in Brazil’s public healthcare system (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS) and theorise implications for equitable access to public healthcare for IACCs globally.Methods We conducted a patient-engaged, qualitative study in the city of Rio de Janeiro. 29 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with SUS professionals from administrative leaders to multidisciplinary primary and specialist care staff (November 2022 to July 2023). Verbatim transcripts were analysed using a pragmatic thematic analysis.Results LC patients’ candidacy for care is invisibilised within SUS through multiple, interacting processes. Interplay of an over-burdened health system, prioritisation of resources in response to (flawed) evidence of demand, misalignment of LC patient capacities and demands of navigating fragmented services, complex referral processes, professionals’ lack of LC knowledge and disregard of the severity and morbidity of a chronic condition amid acute demands, led to the under-recognition of LC by healthcare professionals. Professionals’ under-recognition perpetuates administrators’ de-prioritisiation of resources, policies and training necessary to ensure access to appropriate care, creating a cycle of invisibilisation.Conclusion Urgent action to disrupt a cycle of invisibilisation is essential to mitigate patients’ suffering and intensification of inequalities. Disrupting this pernicious cycle requires more than narrow clinical education efforts. Improved surveillance, education, patient involvement, attention to moral injury and building on existing multidisciplinary strengths may enhance access to LC care. Doing so offers wider benefits beyond patients with LC. We call for a paradigm shift in clinical approaches to IACCs.https://gh.bmj.com/content/9/12/e017017.full
spellingShingle Emma-Louise Aveling
Margareth Crisóstomo Portela
Letícia Soares
Bárbara Caldas
Brenda Sabaine
Flora Cornish
A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care
BMJ Global Health
title A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care
title_full A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care
title_fullStr A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care
title_full_unstemmed A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care
title_short A cycle of invisibilisation: a qualitative study of Brazilian health system factors shaping access to long COVID care
title_sort cycle of invisibilisation a qualitative study of brazilian health system factors shaping access to long covid care
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/9/12/e017017.full
work_keys_str_mv AT emmalouiseaveling acycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT margarethcrisostomoportela acycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT leticiasoares acycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT barbaracaldas acycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT brendasabaine acycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT floracornish acycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT emmalouiseaveling cycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT margarethcrisostomoportela cycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT leticiasoares cycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT barbaracaldas cycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT brendasabaine cycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare
AT floracornish cycleofinvisibilisationaqualitativestudyofbrazilianhealthsystemfactorsshapingaccesstolongcovidcare