Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?

BackgroundIn recent years, we have witnessed a continuous, evidence-based expansion of indications for endovascular therapy (EVT) in the treatment of ischaemic stroke, driven by advancements in extended time windows and target vessel occlusion. Our study aimed to evaluate the temporal changes in pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph Riegler, Viktoria Rücker, Regina von Rennenberg, Kerstin Bollweg, Bastian Cheng, Anna C. Alegiani, Fabian Flottmann, Marlena Schnieder, Marielle Ernst, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Christoffer Kraemer, Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus, Steffen Tiedt, Lars Kellert, Hanna Zimmermann, Felix J. Bode, Gabor C. Petzold, Franziska Dorn, Jörg Berrouschot, Albrecht Bormann, Kathleen Bernkopf, Silke Wunderlich, Tobias Boeckh-Behrens, Martina Petersen, Lars Udo Krause, Stephan Lowens, Heinrich J. Audebert, Eberhard Siebert, Peter U. Heuschmann, Christian H. Nolte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1517276/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859382035677184
author Christoph Riegler
Christoph Riegler
Viktoria Rücker
Regina von Rennenberg
Regina von Rennenberg
Kerstin Bollweg
Kerstin Bollweg
Bastian Cheng
Anna C. Alegiani
Fabian Flottmann
Marlena Schnieder
Marielle Ernst
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Christoffer Kraemer
Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus
Steffen Tiedt
Steffen Tiedt
Lars Kellert
Hanna Zimmermann
Felix J. Bode
Felix J. Bode
Gabor C. Petzold
Gabor C. Petzold
Franziska Dorn
Jörg Berrouschot
Albrecht Bormann
Kathleen Bernkopf
Silke Wunderlich
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
Martina Petersen
Lars Udo Krause
Stephan Lowens
Heinrich J. Audebert
Heinrich J. Audebert
Eberhard Siebert
Peter U. Heuschmann
Peter U. Heuschmann
Peter U. Heuschmann
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
author_facet Christoph Riegler
Christoph Riegler
Viktoria Rücker
Regina von Rennenberg
Regina von Rennenberg
Kerstin Bollweg
Kerstin Bollweg
Bastian Cheng
Anna C. Alegiani
Fabian Flottmann
Marlena Schnieder
Marielle Ernst
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Christoffer Kraemer
Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus
Steffen Tiedt
Steffen Tiedt
Lars Kellert
Hanna Zimmermann
Felix J. Bode
Felix J. Bode
Gabor C. Petzold
Gabor C. Petzold
Franziska Dorn
Jörg Berrouschot
Albrecht Bormann
Kathleen Bernkopf
Silke Wunderlich
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
Martina Petersen
Lars Udo Krause
Stephan Lowens
Heinrich J. Audebert
Heinrich J. Audebert
Eberhard Siebert
Peter U. Heuschmann
Peter U. Heuschmann
Peter U. Heuschmann
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
author_sort Christoph Riegler
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIn recent years, we have witnessed a continuous, evidence-based expansion of indications for endovascular therapy (EVT) in the treatment of ischaemic stroke, driven by advancements in extended time windows and target vessel occlusion. Our study aimed to evaluate the temporal changes in patients’ characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in clinical practice.MethodsWe used data from the German Stroke Registry, a large national multicentre prospective registry, which includes all patients receiving EVT for ischaemic stroke at its participating centers. We analysed baseline factors, treatment details, and clinical outcomes [Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months] over a 5-year period (2017–2021).ResultsWe included 6,251 patients from eight centres. Over time, the characteristics of patients undergoing EVT changed in several aspects (2017 vs. 2021). Patients became older (median age from 76 [IQR: 65–82] to 77 [65–84 years]; ptrend = 0.02), and less severely affected (NIHSS from 15 [11–19] to 13 [8–18]; ptrend <0.001). There was an increase in patients treated more than 6 h after last seen well (22.0% to 28.3%; ptrend<0.001), and more patients were treated for medium vessel occlusion (16.1% to 28.1%; ptrend<0.001). The use of intravenous thrombolysis decreased (52.4% to 40.4%; ptrend<0.01). Good functional outcome declined (percentage of patients with mRS ≤ 2 from 36.0 to 34.9%; aOR 0.94 per year [0.89–0.99]), while mortality at 3 months increased from 25.3% in 2017 to 34.7% in 2021; aOR 1.13 per year [1.07–1.19].ConclusionBetween 2017 and 2021, there were significant shifts in the demographic and clinical profiles of patients undergoing EVT, along with an expansion in EVT indications. Despite these patients presenting with less severe stroke symptoms, improvements in functional outcomes were not observed, and mortality rates increased. These trends may reflect willingness to treat patients with more severe underlying health conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-258e086f07e6459bb8ea4f2c8990f358
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-2295
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj-art-258e086f07e6459bb8ea4f2c8990f3582025-02-11T05:10:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952025-02-011510.3389/fneur.2024.15172761517276Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?Christoph Riegler0Christoph Riegler1Viktoria Rücker2Regina von Rennenberg3Regina von Rennenberg4Kerstin Bollweg5Kerstin Bollweg6Bastian Cheng7Anna C. Alegiani8Fabian Flottmann9Marlena Schnieder10Marielle Ernst11Waltraud Pfeilschifter12Waltraud Pfeilschifter13Waltraud Pfeilschifter14Christoffer Kraemer15Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus16Steffen Tiedt17Steffen Tiedt18Lars Kellert19Hanna Zimmermann20Felix J. Bode21Felix J. Bode22Gabor C. Petzold23Gabor C. Petzold24Franziska Dorn25Jörg Berrouschot26Albrecht Bormann27Kathleen Bernkopf28Silke Wunderlich29Tobias Boeckh-Behrens30Martina Petersen31Lars Udo Krause32Stephan Lowens33Heinrich J. Audebert34Heinrich J. Audebert35Eberhard Siebert36Peter U. Heuschmann37Peter U. Heuschmann38Peter U. Heuschmann39Christian H. Nolte40Christian H. Nolte41Christian H. Nolte42Christian H. Nolte43Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität (JMU) Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Centre of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany0University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany1Department of Radiology, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany2Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany3Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany3Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany4Institute for Neuroradiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany5Department of Vascular Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany6Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany5Department of Vascular Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany6Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany7Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany8Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Altenburger Land, Altenburg, Germany9Klinik für Radiologie, Interventionsradiologie und Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Altenburger Land, Altenburg, Germany0Department of Neurology, School of Medicine Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany0Department of Neurology, School of Medicine Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany2Department of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany2Department of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany3Department of Radiology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany4Department of Neuroradiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität (JMU) Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany5Institute of Medical Data Science, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany6Clinical Trial Center Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany7Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany8Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung DZHK, Berlin, GermanyBackgroundIn recent years, we have witnessed a continuous, evidence-based expansion of indications for endovascular therapy (EVT) in the treatment of ischaemic stroke, driven by advancements in extended time windows and target vessel occlusion. Our study aimed to evaluate the temporal changes in patients’ characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in clinical practice.MethodsWe used data from the German Stroke Registry, a large national multicentre prospective registry, which includes all patients receiving EVT for ischaemic stroke at its participating centers. We analysed baseline factors, treatment details, and clinical outcomes [Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months] over a 5-year period (2017–2021).ResultsWe included 6,251 patients from eight centres. Over time, the characteristics of patients undergoing EVT changed in several aspects (2017 vs. 2021). Patients became older (median age from 76 [IQR: 65–82] to 77 [65–84 years]; ptrend = 0.02), and less severely affected (NIHSS from 15 [11–19] to 13 [8–18]; ptrend <0.001). There was an increase in patients treated more than 6 h after last seen well (22.0% to 28.3%; ptrend<0.001), and more patients were treated for medium vessel occlusion (16.1% to 28.1%; ptrend<0.001). The use of intravenous thrombolysis decreased (52.4% to 40.4%; ptrend<0.01). Good functional outcome declined (percentage of patients with mRS ≤ 2 from 36.0 to 34.9%; aOR 0.94 per year [0.89–0.99]), while mortality at 3 months increased from 25.3% in 2017 to 34.7% in 2021; aOR 1.13 per year [1.07–1.19].ConclusionBetween 2017 and 2021, there were significant shifts in the demographic and clinical profiles of patients undergoing EVT, along with an expansion in EVT indications. Despite these patients presenting with less severe stroke symptoms, improvements in functional outcomes were not observed, and mortality rates increased. These trends may reflect willingness to treat patients with more severe underlying health conditions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1517276/fullischaemic strokeendovascular therapymechanical thrombectomytime trendsreal world data
spellingShingle Christoph Riegler
Christoph Riegler
Viktoria Rücker
Regina von Rennenberg
Regina von Rennenberg
Kerstin Bollweg
Kerstin Bollweg
Bastian Cheng
Anna C. Alegiani
Fabian Flottmann
Marlena Schnieder
Marielle Ernst
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Christoffer Kraemer
Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus
Steffen Tiedt
Steffen Tiedt
Lars Kellert
Hanna Zimmermann
Felix J. Bode
Felix J. Bode
Gabor C. Petzold
Gabor C. Petzold
Franziska Dorn
Jörg Berrouschot
Albrecht Bormann
Kathleen Bernkopf
Silke Wunderlich
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
Martina Petersen
Lars Udo Krause
Stephan Lowens
Heinrich J. Audebert
Heinrich J. Audebert
Eberhard Siebert
Peter U. Heuschmann
Peter U. Heuschmann
Peter U. Heuschmann
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Christian H. Nolte
Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
Frontiers in Neurology
ischaemic stroke
endovascular therapy
mechanical thrombectomy
time trends
real world data
title Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
title_full Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
title_fullStr Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
title_short Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017–2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?
title_sort time trends in mechanical thrombectomy 2017 2021 do real world data reflect advances in evidence
topic ischaemic stroke
endovascular therapy
mechanical thrombectomy
time trends
real world data
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1517276/full
work_keys_str_mv AT christophriegler timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT christophriegler timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT viktoriarucker timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT reginavonrennenberg timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT reginavonrennenberg timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT kerstinbollweg timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT kerstinbollweg timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT bastiancheng timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT annacalegiani timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT fabianflottmann timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT marlenaschnieder timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT marielleernst timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT waltraudpfeilschifter timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT waltraudpfeilschifter timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT waltraudpfeilschifter timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT christofferkraemer timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT rubenmuhlbenninghaus timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT steffentiedt timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT steffentiedt timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT larskellert timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT hannazimmermann timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT felixjbode timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT felixjbode timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT gaborcpetzold timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT gaborcpetzold timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT franziskadorn timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT jorgberrouschot timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT albrechtbormann timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT kathleenbernkopf timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT silkewunderlich timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT tobiasboeckhbehrens timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT martinapetersen timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT larsudokrause timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT stephanlowens timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT heinrichjaudebert timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT heinrichjaudebert timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT eberhardsiebert timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT peteruheuschmann timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT peteruheuschmann timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT peteruheuschmann timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT christianhnolte timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT christianhnolte timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT christianhnolte timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence
AT christianhnolte timetrendsinmechanicalthrombectomy20172021dorealworlddatareflectadvancesinevidence