Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the hemorrhage risk in solid tumor patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and their combination using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.MethodsData from Q1 2011 to Q4 2023 were extracted from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuhui Yang, Pingping Long, Ying Tuo, Xiaoxiao Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1527570/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860943738634240
author Yuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
Pingping Long
Pingping Long
Ying Tuo
Ying Tuo
Xiaoxiao Wang
author_facet Yuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
Pingping Long
Pingping Long
Ying Tuo
Ying Tuo
Xiaoxiao Wang
author_sort Yuhui Yang
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the hemorrhage risk in solid tumor patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and their combination using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.MethodsData from Q1 2011 to Q4 2023 were extracted from the FAERS database for solid tumor patients treated with AGIs, ICIs, or their combination. A disproportionality analysis was conducted by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), as well as the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), to identify potential safety signals. To assess whether the hemorrhage risk is higher with combination therapy compared to monotherapy, additive and multiplicative models were employed to evaluate the interactions between combination and single-agent treatments.ResultsThe combination of AGIs and ICIs significantly increased the risk of hemorrhagic adverse events, particularly tumor and pulmonary hemorrhage. Hemorrhagic events were common in females (50.97%) and older patients (aged 64+), frequently occurring within the first 30 days of treatment (38.11%). Gingival hemorrhage (ROR 3, PRR 418.9) and tumor hemorrhage (ROR 9.65, PRR 1893.36) were most common in the AGI group, while tumor hemorrhage (ROR 9.49, PRR 1350.78) and pulmonary hemorrhage (ROR 2.6, PRR 98.97) were prominent in the ICI group. In the combination group, esophageal variceal hemorrhage (ROR 40.72, PRR 2344.72) and tumor hemorrhage (ROR 19.31, PRR 1056.63) exhibited significantly increased risks Additive and multiplicative models indicated that the excess risk (RDAB = 0.01025, P<0.001) and relative risk (RRAB = 1.99277, P<0.001) of combination therapy were significantly higher than those of monotherapy, suggesting a positive interaction between the drugs that further increases the risk of hemorrhage.ConclusionOur study demonstrates that the combination of AGIs and ICIs significantly raises the risk of hemorrhage, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced monitoring protocols in clinical practice to improve treatment efficacy and safety.
format Article
id doaj-art-2986da899f194dd4902d7c53b1d49ba5
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-3224
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj-art-2986da899f194dd4902d7c53b1d49ba52025-02-10T06:49:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242025-02-011610.3389/fimmu.2025.15275701527570Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitorsYuhui Yang0Yuhui Yang1Yuhui Yang2Pingping Long3Pingping Long4Ying Tuo5Ying Tuo6Xiaoxiao Wang7Department of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, ChinaObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the hemorrhage risk in solid tumor patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and their combination using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.MethodsData from Q1 2011 to Q4 2023 were extracted from the FAERS database for solid tumor patients treated with AGIs, ICIs, or their combination. A disproportionality analysis was conducted by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), as well as the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), to identify potential safety signals. To assess whether the hemorrhage risk is higher with combination therapy compared to monotherapy, additive and multiplicative models were employed to evaluate the interactions between combination and single-agent treatments.ResultsThe combination of AGIs and ICIs significantly increased the risk of hemorrhagic adverse events, particularly tumor and pulmonary hemorrhage. Hemorrhagic events were common in females (50.97%) and older patients (aged 64+), frequently occurring within the first 30 days of treatment (38.11%). Gingival hemorrhage (ROR 3, PRR 418.9) and tumor hemorrhage (ROR 9.65, PRR 1893.36) were most common in the AGI group, while tumor hemorrhage (ROR 9.49, PRR 1350.78) and pulmonary hemorrhage (ROR 2.6, PRR 98.97) were prominent in the ICI group. In the combination group, esophageal variceal hemorrhage (ROR 40.72, PRR 2344.72) and tumor hemorrhage (ROR 19.31, PRR 1056.63) exhibited significantly increased risks Additive and multiplicative models indicated that the excess risk (RDAB = 0.01025, P<0.001) and relative risk (RRAB = 1.99277, P<0.001) of combination therapy were significantly higher than those of monotherapy, suggesting a positive interaction between the drugs that further increases the risk of hemorrhage.ConclusionOur study demonstrates that the combination of AGIs and ICIs significantly raises the risk of hemorrhage, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced monitoring protocols in clinical practice to improve treatment efficacy and safety.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1527570/fullimmune checkpoint inhibitorsangiogenesis inhibitorsFDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)hemorrhagic riskscancer therapyimmunotherapy
spellingShingle Yuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
Yuhui Yang
Pingping Long
Pingping Long
Ying Tuo
Ying Tuo
Xiaoxiao Wang
Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
Frontiers in Immunology
immune checkpoint inhibitors
angiogenesis inhibitors
FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)
hemorrhagic risks
cancer therapy
immunotherapy
title Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_fullStr Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_short Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_sort assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors
topic immune checkpoint inhibitors
angiogenesis inhibitors
FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)
hemorrhagic risks
cancer therapy
immunotherapy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1527570/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhuiyang assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT yuhuiyang assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT yuhuiyang assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT pingpinglong assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT pingpinglong assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT yingtuo assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT yingtuo assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT xiaoxiaowang assessinghemorrhagicrisksincombinationtherapyimplicationsofangiogenesisinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointinhibitors