A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare
Abstract Background Variation in perioperative care persists globally. Consensus discussions may facilitate standardisation, yet the processes used to reach agreement are poorly understood. This study aimed to develop a model for conducting local consensus discussions when implementing standardised...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Implementation Science Communications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00699-9 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823862136829378560 |
|---|---|
| author | Lisa Pagano Janet C. Long Emilie Francis-Auton Andrew Hirschhorn Gaston Arnolda Jeffrey Braithwaite Mitchell N. Sarkies |
| author_facet | Lisa Pagano Janet C. Long Emilie Francis-Auton Andrew Hirschhorn Gaston Arnolda Jeffrey Braithwaite Mitchell N. Sarkies |
| author_sort | Lisa Pagano |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Variation in perioperative care persists globally. Consensus discussions may facilitate standardisation, yet the processes used to reach agreement are poorly understood. This study aimed to develop a model for conducting local consensus discussions when implementing standardised perioperative pathways. Specifically, we 1) describe how local consensus discussions are operationalised; 2) identify what guides decision making and consensus between clinicians; and 3) formulate explanatory mechanisms and identify determinants that facilitate consensus discussions. Methods A qualitative, modified grounded theory study was conducted in one private hospital in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Thirty-one participants from clinical disciplines and hospital management/leadership were included. Data were collected from nine semi-structured interviews and 16 h of participant observations during consensus development or implementation meetings. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently until theoretical saturation was achieved. Interviews and field notes were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using coding, constant comparison, detailed memo writing and data interpretation. Results Seven individual and contextual factors crucial for building consensus, and eight mechanisms for reaching agreement were identified and integrated into a conceptual model. Seeking evidence to support decision-making emerged as the primary driver of consensus. Strong research evidence in support of a pathway component facilitated swift agreement. Where there was ambiguous evidence for a pathway component, clinicians based their decisions on a desire for professional autonomy, consideration of how their peers practice, patient preferences, practices from external organisations, or the feasibility of implementing the pathway component. Conclusions The Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare provides a map for healthcare organisations seeking to conduct local consensus discussions to reduce variation in care. Our findings advance our understanding of how local consensus discussions are conducted and factors that impact success when standardising care amongst clinicians. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2c5a0dfad5264083b0935eba6fc77cbc |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2662-2211 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Implementation Science Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-2c5a0dfad5264083b0935eba6fc77cbc2025-02-09T12:39:16ZengBMCImplementation Science Communications2662-22112025-02-016111410.1186/s43058-025-00699-9A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising HealthcareLisa Pagano0Janet C. Long1Emilie Francis-Auton2Andrew Hirschhorn3Gaston Arnolda4Jeffrey Braithwaite5Mitchell N. Sarkies6Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityMQ Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversityAbstract Background Variation in perioperative care persists globally. Consensus discussions may facilitate standardisation, yet the processes used to reach agreement are poorly understood. This study aimed to develop a model for conducting local consensus discussions when implementing standardised perioperative pathways. Specifically, we 1) describe how local consensus discussions are operationalised; 2) identify what guides decision making and consensus between clinicians; and 3) formulate explanatory mechanisms and identify determinants that facilitate consensus discussions. Methods A qualitative, modified grounded theory study was conducted in one private hospital in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Thirty-one participants from clinical disciplines and hospital management/leadership were included. Data were collected from nine semi-structured interviews and 16 h of participant observations during consensus development or implementation meetings. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently until theoretical saturation was achieved. Interviews and field notes were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using coding, constant comparison, detailed memo writing and data interpretation. Results Seven individual and contextual factors crucial for building consensus, and eight mechanisms for reaching agreement were identified and integrated into a conceptual model. Seeking evidence to support decision-making emerged as the primary driver of consensus. Strong research evidence in support of a pathway component facilitated swift agreement. Where there was ambiguous evidence for a pathway component, clinicians based their decisions on a desire for professional autonomy, consideration of how their peers practice, patient preferences, practices from external organisations, or the feasibility of implementing the pathway component. Conclusions The Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare provides a map for healthcare organisations seeking to conduct local consensus discussions to reduce variation in care. Our findings advance our understanding of how local consensus discussions are conducted and factors that impact success when standardising care amongst clinicians.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00699-9Implementation scienceConsensusImplementationStrategyMechanismPerioperative care |
| spellingShingle | Lisa Pagano Janet C. Long Emilie Francis-Auton Andrew Hirschhorn Gaston Arnolda Jeffrey Braithwaite Mitchell N. Sarkies A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare Implementation Science Communications Implementation science Consensus Implementation Strategy Mechanism Perioperative care |
| title | A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare |
| title_full | A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare |
| title_fullStr | A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare |
| title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare |
| title_short | A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare |
| title_sort | qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development the consensus model for standardising healthcare |
| topic | Implementation science Consensus Implementation Strategy Mechanism Perioperative care |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00699-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lisapagano aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT janetclong aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT emiliefrancisauton aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT andrewhirschhorn aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT gastonarnolda aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT jeffreybraithwaite aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT mitchellnsarkies aqualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT lisapagano qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT janetclong qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT emiliefrancisauton qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT andrewhirschhorn qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT gastonarnolda qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT jeffreybraithwaite qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare AT mitchellnsarkies qualitativestudyofhowcliniciansreachagreementinperioperativepathwaydevelopmenttheconsensusmodelforstandardisinghealthcare |