Tradition, modernism, and apartheid

In this article it is argued that apartheid, as idea-historical phenomenon, needs to be understood against the background of a short comparison between modern and premodern thought. Apartheid was, in many respects, a theoretical and practical manifestation of modernism. As such, it was by no means...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. Goosen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2017-11-01
Series:Acta Theologica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/3308
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858895030845440
author D. Goosen
author_facet D. Goosen
author_sort D. Goosen
collection DOAJ
description In this article it is argued that apartheid, as idea-historical phenomenon, needs to be understood against the background of a short comparison between modern and premodern thought. Apartheid was, in many respects, a theoretical and practical manifestation of modernism. As such, it was by no means a modern anomaly, or a phenomenon that contradicted the fundamental assumptions of modern philosophical and political thought. The first section of this article addresses only a single aspect of traditional thought, namely the idea of being understood as circular event. Traditional thought understood being as emanating from, and returning to a first principle, namely the Good (Plato), the One (Plotinus), or God (Aquinas). The ensuing section discusses only a single aspect of modernism, namely its understanding of being not as circular event, but as a neutral, spatial, and linear grid upon which reality can be mapped. Once mapped on such a grid, according to modernism, being can be experienced as a “standing reserve” (or as an always available resource) to be controlled and used at will by the modern subject. In the third section of this article, it is argued that apartheid was made possible by the above ontological presupposition. According to the apartheid state, being could, in principle, be spatialised on a neutral grid, and thus directed and controlled from the vantage point of the sovereign subject. The concluding section focuses on the much-discredited community, the Afrikaners. Despite disclaimers among Afrikaners, the heavy burden of the apartheid legacy rests squarely on their shoulders. However, it will also be argued that Afrikaners, if given the opportunity, may provide us in future with important examples of a politics that moves beyond the spatialising and geometrising ambitions of the modern state. In a hermeneutical re-appropriation of their own pre-modern tradition, Afrikaners may, in collaboration with other communities, help show a way toward a traditional politics of place (rather than the modern politics of space).
format Article
id doaj-art-2e3e9e3c6ff3447bbef953e1ce889ef5
institution Kabale University
issn 1015-8758
2309-9089
language English
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Theologica
spelling doaj-art-2e3e9e3c6ff3447bbef953e1ce889ef52025-02-11T09:51:12ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Theologica1015-87582309-90892017-11-012510.38140/at.v0i25.3308Tradition, modernism, and apartheidD. Goosen0University of South Africa In this article it is argued that apartheid, as idea-historical phenomenon, needs to be understood against the background of a short comparison between modern and premodern thought. Apartheid was, in many respects, a theoretical and practical manifestation of modernism. As such, it was by no means a modern anomaly, or a phenomenon that contradicted the fundamental assumptions of modern philosophical and political thought. The first section of this article addresses only a single aspect of traditional thought, namely the idea of being understood as circular event. Traditional thought understood being as emanating from, and returning to a first principle, namely the Good (Plato), the One (Plotinus), or God (Aquinas). The ensuing section discusses only a single aspect of modernism, namely its understanding of being not as circular event, but as a neutral, spatial, and linear grid upon which reality can be mapped. Once mapped on such a grid, according to modernism, being can be experienced as a “standing reserve” (or as an always available resource) to be controlled and used at will by the modern subject. In the third section of this article, it is argued that apartheid was made possible by the above ontological presupposition. According to the apartheid state, being could, in principle, be spatialised on a neutral grid, and thus directed and controlled from the vantage point of the sovereign subject. The concluding section focuses on the much-discredited community, the Afrikaners. Despite disclaimers among Afrikaners, the heavy burden of the apartheid legacy rests squarely on their shoulders. However, it will also be argued that Afrikaners, if given the opportunity, may provide us in future with important examples of a politics that moves beyond the spatialising and geometrising ambitions of the modern state. In a hermeneutical re-appropriation of their own pre-modern tradition, Afrikaners may, in collaboration with other communities, help show a way toward a traditional politics of place (rather than the modern politics of space). https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/3308TraditionPremodernismEric D. PerlModernismApartheidTradisie
spellingShingle D. Goosen
Tradition, modernism, and apartheid
Acta Theologica
Tradition
Premodernism
Eric D. Perl
Modernism
Apartheid
Tradisie
title Tradition, modernism, and apartheid
title_full Tradition, modernism, and apartheid
title_fullStr Tradition, modernism, and apartheid
title_full_unstemmed Tradition, modernism, and apartheid
title_short Tradition, modernism, and apartheid
title_sort tradition modernism and apartheid
topic Tradition
Premodernism
Eric D. Perl
Modernism
Apartheid
Tradisie
url https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/3308
work_keys_str_mv AT dgoosen traditionmodernismandapartheid