SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.

This study investigates the influence of SET ESG ratings on firm value of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), emphasizing the multifaceted relationships between ESG performance, third-party evaluations, and market reactions following SET ESG ratings announcements. The findings...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mongkhol Moolkham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315935
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856726713040896
author Mongkhol Moolkham
author_facet Mongkhol Moolkham
author_sort Mongkhol Moolkham
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the influence of SET ESG ratings on firm value of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), emphasizing the multifaceted relationships between ESG performance, third-party evaluations, and market reactions following SET ESG ratings announcements. The findings reveal that firms with higher SET ESG ratings experience significant enhancements in firm value due to their superior management of environmental and social risks, which reduces regulatory and reputational threats. Furthermore, the research uncovers the nuanced role of third-party ESG evaluations, indicating that while endorsements from reputable sources can amplify the positive effects of SET ESG ratings, more or conflicting assessments can lead to diminished firm value. Specifically, a single strong endorsement markedly enhances firm value, whereas evaluations from two to three third parties may introduce confusion, leading to increased information asymmetry. This finding challenges the assumption that multiple endorsements always translate to greater value, emphasizing the need for firms to strategically select their evaluators to optimize market perceptions. Moreover, the study illustrates that announcements of SET ESG ratings result in immediate and sustained increases in firm value, highlighting ESG performance as a critical determinant of long-term viability in the eyes of investors. These results provide actionable guidance for investors and policymakers, advocating for the integration of robust ESG practices to enhance market confidence and drive long-term value creation. This research contributes to the existing literature by elucidating the intricate dynamics between SET ESG ratings, third-party evaluations, and firm value, thereby offering valuable perspectives for firms navigating a sustainability-focused landscape.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e8e4bde2f9c4f67964d888bc98ed512
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-2e8e4bde2f9c4f67964d888bc98ed5122025-02-12T05:31:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e031593510.1371/journal.pone.0315935SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.Mongkhol MoolkhamThis study investigates the influence of SET ESG ratings on firm value of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), emphasizing the multifaceted relationships between ESG performance, third-party evaluations, and market reactions following SET ESG ratings announcements. The findings reveal that firms with higher SET ESG ratings experience significant enhancements in firm value due to their superior management of environmental and social risks, which reduces regulatory and reputational threats. Furthermore, the research uncovers the nuanced role of third-party ESG evaluations, indicating that while endorsements from reputable sources can amplify the positive effects of SET ESG ratings, more or conflicting assessments can lead to diminished firm value. Specifically, a single strong endorsement markedly enhances firm value, whereas evaluations from two to three third parties may introduce confusion, leading to increased information asymmetry. This finding challenges the assumption that multiple endorsements always translate to greater value, emphasizing the need for firms to strategically select their evaluators to optimize market perceptions. Moreover, the study illustrates that announcements of SET ESG ratings result in immediate and sustained increases in firm value, highlighting ESG performance as a critical determinant of long-term viability in the eyes of investors. These results provide actionable guidance for investors and policymakers, advocating for the integration of robust ESG practices to enhance market confidence and drive long-term value creation. This research contributes to the existing literature by elucidating the intricate dynamics between SET ESG ratings, third-party evaluations, and firm value, thereby offering valuable perspectives for firms navigating a sustainability-focused landscape.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315935
spellingShingle Mongkhol Moolkham
SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.
PLoS ONE
title SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.
title_full SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.
title_fullStr SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.
title_full_unstemmed SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.
title_short SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand.
title_sort set esg ratings and firm value the new sustainability performance assessment tool in thailand
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315935
work_keys_str_mv AT mongkholmoolkham setesgratingsandfirmvaluethenewsustainabilityperformanceassessmenttoolinthailand