Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions
<p>Aerosol and secondary ice production (SIP) processes are both vital to charge separation in thunderstorms, but the relative importance of different SIP processes to electrification under different aerosol conditions is not well understood. In this study, using the Weather Research and Forec...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| Online Access: | https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1831/2025/acp-25-1831-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823858538756177920 |
|---|---|
| author | S. Huang J. Yang J. Yang J. Li Q. Chen Q. Zhang F. Guo |
| author_facet | S. Huang J. Yang J. Yang J. Li Q. Chen Q. Zhang F. Guo |
| author_sort | S. Huang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Aerosol and secondary ice production (SIP) processes are both vital to charge separation in thunderstorms, but the relative importance of different SIP processes to electrification under different aerosol conditions is not well understood. In this study, using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, we investigate the role of four different SIP processes in charge separation with different aerosol concentrations, including the rime splintering (RS), the ice–ice collisional (IC) breakup, shattering of freezing drops (SD), and sublimational breakup (SK). It is found that as the aerosol concentration increases, more but smaller cloud droplets can be lofted to mixed-phase regions. The warm-rain process is suppressed, and the declined raindrop concentration leads to fewer graupel particles. In a clean environment (aerosol concentration <span class="inline-formula"><1000</span> <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>−3</sup></span>), the SD process is the most important to ice production between 0 and <span class="inline-formula">−10</span> °C, while in a polluted environment (aerosol concentration <span class="inline-formula">≥2000</span> <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>−3</sup></span>), the RS process contributes the most between 0 and <span class="inline-formula">−10</span> °C. The IC process is important between <span class="inline-formula">−10</span> and <span class="inline-formula">−20</span> °C. The SIP processes and the increase in aerosol concentration both enhance the noninductive charging rate. However, aerosol and SIP processes have opposite impacts on the charging reversal, which implies they play different roles in controlling the charge structure. In a clean (polluted) environment, the SD (RS) process has the greatest effect on the charge structure. Both the SIP processes and the increase in aerosol concentration enhance the electric field, but the enhancement in the flash rate induced by increasing aerosol concentration is much greater than SIP.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-34ee08ffd48e407799c25c09195b5c59 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| spelling | doaj-art-34ee08ffd48e407799c25c09195b5c592025-02-11T10:48:12ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242025-02-01251831185010.5194/acp-25-1831-2025Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditionsS. Huang0J. Yang1J. Yang2J. Li3Q. Chen4Q. Zhang5F. Guo6Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaChina Meteorological Administration Key Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Weather Modification (CPML), Beijing 100081, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China<p>Aerosol and secondary ice production (SIP) processes are both vital to charge separation in thunderstorms, but the relative importance of different SIP processes to electrification under different aerosol conditions is not well understood. In this study, using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, we investigate the role of four different SIP processes in charge separation with different aerosol concentrations, including the rime splintering (RS), the ice–ice collisional (IC) breakup, shattering of freezing drops (SD), and sublimational breakup (SK). It is found that as the aerosol concentration increases, more but smaller cloud droplets can be lofted to mixed-phase regions. The warm-rain process is suppressed, and the declined raindrop concentration leads to fewer graupel particles. In a clean environment (aerosol concentration <span class="inline-formula"><1000</span> <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>−3</sup></span>), the SD process is the most important to ice production between 0 and <span class="inline-formula">−10</span> °C, while in a polluted environment (aerosol concentration <span class="inline-formula">≥2000</span> <span class="inline-formula">cm<sup>−3</sup></span>), the RS process contributes the most between 0 and <span class="inline-formula">−10</span> °C. The IC process is important between <span class="inline-formula">−10</span> and <span class="inline-formula">−20</span> °C. The SIP processes and the increase in aerosol concentration both enhance the noninductive charging rate. However, aerosol and SIP processes have opposite impacts on the charging reversal, which implies they play different roles in controlling the charge structure. In a clean (polluted) environment, the SD (RS) process has the greatest effect on the charge structure. Both the SIP processes and the increase in aerosol concentration enhance the electric field, but the enhancement in the flash rate induced by increasing aerosol concentration is much greater than SIP.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1831/2025/acp-25-1831-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | S. Huang J. Yang J. Yang J. Li Q. Chen Q. Zhang F. Guo Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| title | Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions |
| title_full | Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions |
| title_fullStr | Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions |
| title_short | Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions |
| title_sort | impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions |
| url | https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1831/2025/acp-25-1831-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shuang impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions AT jyang impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions AT jyang impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions AT jli impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions AT qchen impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions AT qzhang impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions AT fguo impactofsecondaryiceproductiononthunderstormelectrificationunderdifferentaerosolconditions |