Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?

**Background:** Modeling techniques in the field of pediatrics present unique challenges beyond traditional model limitations, and sometimes difficulties in faithfully simulating the condition's evolution over time. **Objective:** This study aimed to identify whether economic modeling approach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roque Cardona-Hernandez, Alberto de la Cuadra-Grande, Julen Monje, María Echave, Itziar Oyagüez, María Álvarez, Isabel Leiva-Gea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.127920
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860269814644736
author Roque Cardona-Hernandez
Alberto de la Cuadra-Grande
Julen Monje
María Echave
Itziar Oyagüez
María Álvarez
Isabel Leiva-Gea
author_facet Roque Cardona-Hernandez
Alberto de la Cuadra-Grande
Julen Monje
María Echave
Itziar Oyagüez
María Álvarez
Isabel Leiva-Gea
author_sort Roque Cardona-Hernandez
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Modeling techniques in the field of pediatrics present unique challenges beyond traditional model limitations, and sometimes difficulties in faithfully simulating the condition's evolution over time. **Objective:** This study aimed to identify whether economic modeling approaches in diabetes in pediatric patients align with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines and the latest scientific evidence. **Methods:** A literature review was performed in March 2023 to identify modeling-based economic evaluations in diabetes in pediatric patients. Data were extracted and synthesized from eligible studies. Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes were gathered to compare their alignment with modeling strategies. Two endocrinology specialists provided insights on the latest findings in diabetes that are not yet included in the guidelines. A multidisciplinary group of experts agreed on the relevant themes to conduct the comparative analysis: parameter informing on glycemic control, diabetic ketoacidosis/hypoglycemia, C-peptide as prognostic biomarker, metabolic memory, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, pediatric-specific sources of risk equations, and pediatric-specific sources of utilities/disutilities. **Results:** Nineteen modeling-based studies (7 de novo, 12 predesigned models) and 34 guidelines were selected. Hemoglobin A1c was the main parameter to model the glycemic control; however, guidelines recommend the usage of complementary measures (eg, time in range) which are not included in economic models. Eight models included diabetic ketoacidosis (42.1%), 16 included hypoglycemia (84.2%), 2 included C-peptide (1 of those as prognostic factor) (10.5%) and 1 included legacy effect (5.3%). Neither guidelines nor models included recent findings, such as age at diagnosis or socioeconomic status, as prognostic factors. The lack of pediatric-specific sources for risk equations and utility/disutility values were additional limitations. **Discussion:** Economic models designed for assessing interventions in diabetes in pediatric patients should be based on pediatric-specific data and include novel adjuvant glucose-monitoring metrics and latest evidence on prognostic factors (C-peptide, legacy effect, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status) to provide a more faithful reflection of the disease. **Conclusions:** Economic models represent useful tools to inform decision making. However, further research assessing the gaps is needed to enhance evidence-based health economic modeling that best represents reality.
format Article
id doaj-art-3abf38490bea4a2aa4399a2eb7d04490
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-3abf38490bea4a2aa4399a2eb7d044902025-02-10T16:13:35ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362025-02-01121Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?Roque Cardona-HernandezAlberto de la Cuadra-GrandeJulen MonjeMaría EchaveItziar OyagüezMaría ÁlvarezIsabel Leiva-Gea**Background:** Modeling techniques in the field of pediatrics present unique challenges beyond traditional model limitations, and sometimes difficulties in faithfully simulating the condition's evolution over time. **Objective:** This study aimed to identify whether economic modeling approaches in diabetes in pediatric patients align with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines and the latest scientific evidence. **Methods:** A literature review was performed in March 2023 to identify modeling-based economic evaluations in diabetes in pediatric patients. Data were extracted and synthesized from eligible studies. Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes were gathered to compare their alignment with modeling strategies. Two endocrinology specialists provided insights on the latest findings in diabetes that are not yet included in the guidelines. A multidisciplinary group of experts agreed on the relevant themes to conduct the comparative analysis: parameter informing on glycemic control, diabetic ketoacidosis/hypoglycemia, C-peptide as prognostic biomarker, metabolic memory, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, pediatric-specific sources of risk equations, and pediatric-specific sources of utilities/disutilities. **Results:** Nineteen modeling-based studies (7 de novo, 12 predesigned models) and 34 guidelines were selected. Hemoglobin A1c was the main parameter to model the glycemic control; however, guidelines recommend the usage of complementary measures (eg, time in range) which are not included in economic models. Eight models included diabetic ketoacidosis (42.1%), 16 included hypoglycemia (84.2%), 2 included C-peptide (1 of those as prognostic factor) (10.5%) and 1 included legacy effect (5.3%). Neither guidelines nor models included recent findings, such as age at diagnosis or socioeconomic status, as prognostic factors. The lack of pediatric-specific sources for risk equations and utility/disutility values were additional limitations. **Discussion:** Economic models designed for assessing interventions in diabetes in pediatric patients should be based on pediatric-specific data and include novel adjuvant glucose-monitoring metrics and latest evidence on prognostic factors (C-peptide, legacy effect, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status) to provide a more faithful reflection of the disease. **Conclusions:** Economic models represent useful tools to inform decision making. However, further research assessing the gaps is needed to enhance evidence-based health economic modeling that best represents reality.https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.127920
spellingShingle Roque Cardona-Hernandez
Alberto de la Cuadra-Grande
Julen Monje
María Echave
Itziar Oyagüez
María Álvarez
Isabel Leiva-Gea
Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?
title_full Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?
title_fullStr Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?
title_full_unstemmed Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?
title_short Are Trends in Economic Modeling of Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus up to Date with the Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Latest Scientific Findings?
title_sort are trends in economic modeling of pediatric diabetes mellitus up to date with the clinical practice guidelines and the latest scientific findings
url https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.127920
work_keys_str_mv AT roquecardonahernandez aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings
AT albertodelacuadragrande aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings
AT julenmonje aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings
AT mariaechave aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings
AT itziaroyaguez aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings
AT mariaalvarez aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings
AT isabelleivagea aretrendsineconomicmodelingofpediatricdiabetesmellitusuptodatewiththeclinicalpracticeguidelinesandthelatestscientificfindings