A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks

Abstract In this study, the performance (particle removal efficiency and breathing resistance) of several commercially available face masks (KF80-certified electrostatic and nanofiber filter masks, and an uncertified mask) was evaluated, along with their filter structure and composition. Also, the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haebum Lee, Seojeong Kim, HungSoo Joo, Hee-joo Cho, Kihong Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2022-01-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210370
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862882116304896
author Haebum Lee
Seojeong Kim
HungSoo Joo
Hee-joo Cho
Kihong Park
author_facet Haebum Lee
Seojeong Kim
HungSoo Joo
Hee-joo Cho
Kihong Park
author_sort Haebum Lee
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this study, the performance (particle removal efficiency and breathing resistance) of several commercially available face masks (KF80-certified electrostatic and nanofiber filter masks, and an uncertified mask) was evaluated, along with their filter structure and composition. Also, the effects of the relative humidity (RH) of incoming air, of water and alcohol exposure, and of reuse, on the performance of face masks were examined. Monodisperse and polydisperse sodium chloride particles were used as test aerosols. Except for the uncertified mask filter, PM2.5 removal efficiency was > 90%. The nanofiber filter mask had the highest quality factor due to its low pressure drop and high removal efficiency, and densely packed nanofiber pore structure, and significant amounts of fluorine, carbon and oxygen. The removal efficiency of the KF80-certified mask was barely affected by the higher RH of incoming air. When the mask filters were soaked in water, their removal efficiency decreased. The uncertified mask filter showed the largest decrease in removal efficiency (26%). When the mask was soaked in alcohol, the removal efficiency decreased to a greater degree than when soaked in water. The nanofiber mask filter showed the strongest resistance to alcohol among the tested mask filters. During evaluation of mask reusability, the removal efficiency of certified mask filters decreased by 4% over 5 consecutive days (2 hours per day), and that for the uncertified mask filter decreased significantly, by 30% after 5 days.
format Article
id doaj-art-3ec509b387ec4ab2ae0988c7dff8ab45
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-3ec509b387ec4ab2ae0988c7dff8ab452025-02-09T12:18:43ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092022-01-0122211210.4209/aaqr.210370A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face MasksHaebum Lee0Seojeong Kim1HungSoo Joo2Hee-joo Cho3Kihong Park4National Leading Research Laboratory (Aerosol Technology and Monitoring Laboratory), School of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Techonology (GIST)National Leading Research Laboratory (Aerosol Technology and Monitoring Laboratory), School of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Techonology (GIST)Department of Environmental Engineering, Anyang UniversityNational Leading Research Laboratory (Aerosol Technology and Monitoring Laboratory), School of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Techonology (GIST)National Leading Research Laboratory (Aerosol Technology and Monitoring Laboratory), School of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Techonology (GIST)Abstract In this study, the performance (particle removal efficiency and breathing resistance) of several commercially available face masks (KF80-certified electrostatic and nanofiber filter masks, and an uncertified mask) was evaluated, along with their filter structure and composition. Also, the effects of the relative humidity (RH) of incoming air, of water and alcohol exposure, and of reuse, on the performance of face masks were examined. Monodisperse and polydisperse sodium chloride particles were used as test aerosols. Except for the uncertified mask filter, PM2.5 removal efficiency was > 90%. The nanofiber filter mask had the highest quality factor due to its low pressure drop and high removal efficiency, and densely packed nanofiber pore structure, and significant amounts of fluorine, carbon and oxygen. The removal efficiency of the KF80-certified mask was barely affected by the higher RH of incoming air. When the mask filters were soaked in water, their removal efficiency decreased. The uncertified mask filter showed the largest decrease in removal efficiency (26%). When the mask was soaked in alcohol, the removal efficiency decreased to a greater degree than when soaked in water. The nanofiber mask filter showed the strongest resistance to alcohol among the tested mask filters. During evaluation of mask reusability, the removal efficiency of certified mask filters decreased by 4% over 5 consecutive days (2 hours per day), and that for the uncertified mask filter decreased significantly, by 30% after 5 days.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210370Face maskAerosolsRemoval efficiencyBreathing resistance
spellingShingle Haebum Lee
Seojeong Kim
HungSoo Joo
Hee-joo Cho
Kihong Park
A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Face mask
Aerosols
Removal efficiency
Breathing resistance
title A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks
title_full A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks
title_fullStr A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks
title_full_unstemmed A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks
title_short A Study on Performance and Reusability of Certified and Uncertified Face Masks
title_sort study on performance and reusability of certified and uncertified face masks
topic Face mask
Aerosols
Removal efficiency
Breathing resistance
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210370
work_keys_str_mv AT haebumlee astudyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT seojeongkim astudyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT hungsoojoo astudyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT heejoocho astudyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT kihongpark astudyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT haebumlee studyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT seojeongkim studyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT hungsoojoo studyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT heejoocho studyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks
AT kihongpark studyonperformanceandreusabilityofcertifiedanduncertifiedfacemasks