Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level
Forest health assessments (FHA) have been carried out at European level since the 1980s in order to identify forest damage. The annual surveys are usually conducted without the use of remote sensing tools. However, the increasing availability of remote sensing observations potentially allows conduct...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Central European Forestry Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2024-0022 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823860486001655808 |
|---|---|
| author | Drechsel Johannes Forkel Matthias |
| author_facet | Drechsel Johannes Forkel Matthias |
| author_sort | Drechsel Johannes |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Forest health assessments (FHA) have been carried out at European level since the 1980s in order to identify forest damage. The annual surveys are usually conducted without the use of remote sensing tools. However, the increasing availability of remote sensing observations potentially allows conduct FHA more wide-spread, more often, or in more comprehensive and comparable way. This literature review systematically evaluated 110 studies from 2015 to 2022 that use remote sensing for FHA in Europe. The purpose was to determine (1) which tree species were studied; (2) what types of damage were evaluated; (3) whether damage levels are distinguished according to the standard of the International Co-operative Program on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP-Forest); (4) the level of automation; and (5) whether the findings are applicable for a systematic FHA. The results show that spruce is the most studied tree species. Damage caused by bark beetles and drought were predominantly studied. In most studies only 2 damage levels are classified. Only four studies were able to perform a comprehensive FHA by identifying individual trees, classifying their species and damage levels. None of the studies investigated the suitability of their remote sensing approach for systematic forest health assessments. This result is surprising since programs such as SEMEFOR analyzed the potential of remote sensing for FHA already in the 1990s. We conclude that the availability of new satellite systems and advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning should be translated into FHA practice according to ICP standards. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3f0aff3be12b45818b48be784ff12595 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2454-0358 |
| language | ces |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Central European Forestry Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-3f0aff3be12b45818b48be784ff125952025-02-10T13:25:47ZcesSciendoCentral European Forestry Journal2454-03582025-02-01711143910.2478/forj-2024-0022Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European levelDrechsel Johannes0Forkel Matthias1Landeshauptstadt Hannover, Department of Environment – Forestry Division, GermanyTUD Dresden University of Technology, Faculty for Environmental Science, Environmental Remote Sensing, Helmholtzstr. 10, DE-01069 Dresden, GermanyForest health assessments (FHA) have been carried out at European level since the 1980s in order to identify forest damage. The annual surveys are usually conducted without the use of remote sensing tools. However, the increasing availability of remote sensing observations potentially allows conduct FHA more wide-spread, more often, or in more comprehensive and comparable way. This literature review systematically evaluated 110 studies from 2015 to 2022 that use remote sensing for FHA in Europe. The purpose was to determine (1) which tree species were studied; (2) what types of damage were evaluated; (3) whether damage levels are distinguished according to the standard of the International Co-operative Program on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP-Forest); (4) the level of automation; and (5) whether the findings are applicable for a systematic FHA. The results show that spruce is the most studied tree species. Damage caused by bark beetles and drought were predominantly studied. In most studies only 2 damage levels are classified. Only four studies were able to perform a comprehensive FHA by identifying individual trees, classifying their species and damage levels. None of the studies investigated the suitability of their remote sensing approach for systematic forest health assessments. This result is surprising since programs such as SEMEFOR analyzed the potential of remote sensing for FHA already in the 1990s. We conclude that the availability of new satellite systems and advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning should be translated into FHA practice according to ICP standards.https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2024-0022forest health assessmentremote sensingprismaliterature revieweurope |
| spellingShingle | Drechsel Johannes Forkel Matthias Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level Central European Forestry Journal forest health assessment remote sensing prisma literature review europe |
| title | Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level |
| title_full | Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level |
| title_fullStr | Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level |
| title_full_unstemmed | Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level |
| title_short | Remote sensing forest health assessment – a comprehensive literature review on a European level |
| title_sort | remote sensing forest health assessment a comprehensive literature review on a european level |
| topic | forest health assessment remote sensing prisma literature review europe |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2024-0022 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT drechseljohannes remotesensingforesthealthassessmentacomprehensiveliteraturereviewonaeuropeanlevel AT forkelmatthias remotesensingforesthealthassessmentacomprehensiveliteraturereviewonaeuropeanlevel |