Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study)
Background and Objectives: The most important purpose of dental adhesives is to offer retention to composite fillings or composite cements. The most frequently applied laboratory parameter to evaluate the effectiveness of dentin bonding agents is shear bond strength. The aim of this study is to int...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University
2022-02-01
|
Series: | Erbil Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/132 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823859752341340160 |
---|---|
author | Hidayat Ababakr Khudhur Diyar Khalid Bakr Sazan Sherdl Saleem Sohela Fakher Mahdi |
author_facet | Hidayat Ababakr Khudhur Diyar Khalid Bakr Sazan Sherdl Saleem Sohela Fakher Mahdi |
author_sort | Hidayat Ababakr Khudhur |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Background and Objectives: The most important purpose of dental adhesives is to offer retention to composite fillings or composite cements. The most frequently applied laboratory parameter to evaluate the effectiveness of dentin bonding agents is shear bond strength. The aim of this study is to introduce the 8th generation of bonding to our country's dentists and investigating the manufacturer's claim in this research, and compare the shear bond strength of two types of systems.
Material and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were collected. After preparation, the samples were randomly divided into two groups of fifteen and each group was treated with a different bonding agent. In group A, 15 specimens were treated by Gluma Bond Universal (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany). In group B, 15 specimens were treated by LuxaBond Universal (DMG, Hamburg, Germany). O‐Light Curing Light unit (Woodpecker, Guilin, China) used for polymerization of both bonding systems. Composite (Beautifil Injectable X, Shofu Inc, Kyoto, Japan) cylinders were afterwards placed on the bonded surfaces using an elastic mold and were light‐cured. To measure the shear bond strength of the specimens a universal material tester was used. Descriptive Statistics and One Sample test was conducted for statistical analysis.
Results: The highest strength was seen in the 8th generation bonding agent (LuxaBond Universal (DMG, Hamburg, Germany). A highly significant difference (p < 0.000) was found between the seventh and eighth‐generation bonding groups.
Conclusion: The eighth‐generation bonding agent showed higher mean bond strength than the seventh generation bonding agent.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-40ca73facf43483587ce54d311aaf057 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2523-6172 2616-4795 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
publisher | College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University |
record_format | Article |
series | Erbil Dental Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-40ca73facf43483587ce54d311aaf0572025-02-10T20:48:34ZengCollege Of Dentistry Hawler Medical UniversityErbil Dental Journal2523-61722616-47952022-02-0142Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study)Hidayat Ababakr Khudhur0Diyar Khalid Bakr1Sazan Sherdl Saleem2Sohela Fakher Mahdi3Department of Conservative Detistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of Conservative Detistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of POP, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq. Background and Objectives: The most important purpose of dental adhesives is to offer retention to composite fillings or composite cements. The most frequently applied laboratory parameter to evaluate the effectiveness of dentin bonding agents is shear bond strength. The aim of this study is to introduce the 8th generation of bonding to our country's dentists and investigating the manufacturer's claim in this research, and compare the shear bond strength of two types of systems. Material and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were collected. After preparation, the samples were randomly divided into two groups of fifteen and each group was treated with a different bonding agent. In group A, 15 specimens were treated by Gluma Bond Universal (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany). In group B, 15 specimens were treated by LuxaBond Universal (DMG, Hamburg, Germany). O‐Light Curing Light unit (Woodpecker, Guilin, China) used for polymerization of both bonding systems. Composite (Beautifil Injectable X, Shofu Inc, Kyoto, Japan) cylinders were afterwards placed on the bonded surfaces using an elastic mold and were light‐cured. To measure the shear bond strength of the specimens a universal material tester was used. Descriptive Statistics and One Sample test was conducted for statistical analysis. Results: The highest strength was seen in the 8th generation bonding agent (LuxaBond Universal (DMG, Hamburg, Germany). A highly significant difference (p < 0.000) was found between the seventh and eighth‐generation bonding groups. Conclusion: The eighth‐generation bonding agent showed higher mean bond strength than the seventh generation bonding agent. https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/132Shear bond strengthSelf etching7th and 8th generation bonding agent |
spellingShingle | Hidayat Ababakr Khudhur Diyar Khalid Bakr Sazan Sherdl Saleem Sohela Fakher Mahdi Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study) Erbil Dental Journal Shear bond strength Self etching 7th and 8th generation bonding agent |
title | Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study) |
title_full | Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study) |
title_fullStr | Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study) |
title_short | Evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents (an in vitro study) |
title_sort | evaluating shear bond strength efficacy of seventh and eighth generation bonding agents an in vitro study |
topic | Shear bond strength Self etching 7th and 8th generation bonding agent |
url | https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hidayatababakrkhudhur evaluatingshearbondstrengthefficacyofseventhandeighthgenerationbondingagentsaninvitrostudy AT diyarkhalidbakr evaluatingshearbondstrengthefficacyofseventhandeighthgenerationbondingagentsaninvitrostudy AT sazansherdlsaleem evaluatingshearbondstrengthefficacyofseventhandeighthgenerationbondingagentsaninvitrostudy AT sohelafakhermahdi evaluatingshearbondstrengthefficacyofseventhandeighthgenerationbondingagentsaninvitrostudy |