Blood biomarkers to identify patients with different intracranial lesion combinations after traumatic brain injury
Introduction: There is a lack of studies examining the most promising blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in relation to gross pathology types. Research question: To examine whether the admission levels of blood biomarkers can discriminate patients with different combinations of trauma...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Brain and Spine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000141 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Introduction: There is a lack of studies examining the most promising blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in relation to gross pathology types. Research question: To examine whether the admission levels of blood biomarkers can discriminate patients with different combinations of traumatic intracranial findings from patients with negative computed tomography (CT) scans. Material and methods: One hundred thirty patients with all severities of TBI were studied. Seventy-five had CT-positive and 55 CT-negative findings. CT-positive patients were divided into three clusters (CL) using the Helsinki CT score: focal lesions (CL1), mixed lesions (CL2) and mixed lesions + intraventricular haemorrhage (CL3). CT scans were obtained upon admission and blood samples taken within 24 h from admission. S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), heart fatty-acid binding protein (H-FABP), neurofilament light (NF-L), interleukin-10 (IL-10), total-tau (t-tau), and β-amyloids 1–40 (Aβ40) and 1–42 (Aβ42) were analysed from plasma samples. CT-negative cluster was used as control. Results: GFAP, Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels differed between the clusters, but not significantly. NF-L and t-tau discriminated CL1 from CT-negative cluster with AUCs of 0.737 and 0.771, respectively. NF-L, t-tau and GFAP discriminated CL2 from CT-negative cluster with AUCs of 0.839, 0.781 and 0.840, respectively. All biomarkers analysed were able to discriminate CL3 and CT-negative cluster. Discussion and conclusion: All studied biomarkers distinguished the most severely injured cluster, CL3, from CT-negative cluster. The results may reflect the severity of TBI but also show that biomarkers have a variable ability to identify patients with combinations of intracranial traumatic lesions in the examined time window. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2772-5294 |