Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada

Abstract Despite net-zero pledges, consensus on national responsibilities for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategies is lacking. Here, we use integrated assessment modeling to examine equity-informed estimates of Canada’s remaining carbon budgets, exploring CDR’s role at net-zero and beyond. Gigato...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kasra Motlaghzadeh, Neil Craik, Juan Moreno-Cruz, Vanessa Schweizer, Jay Fuhrman, Keith W. Hipel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Communications Earth & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02080-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861548569853952
author Kasra Motlaghzadeh
Neil Craik
Juan Moreno-Cruz
Vanessa Schweizer
Jay Fuhrman
Keith W. Hipel
author_facet Kasra Motlaghzadeh
Neil Craik
Juan Moreno-Cruz
Vanessa Schweizer
Jay Fuhrman
Keith W. Hipel
author_sort Kasra Motlaghzadeh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Despite net-zero pledges, consensus on national responsibilities for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategies is lacking. Here, we use integrated assessment modeling to examine equity-informed estimates of Canada’s remaining carbon budgets, exploring CDR’s role at net-zero and beyond. Gigaton-scale CDR efforts post-2050 are needed to address Canada’s carbon debt under various burden-sharing principles. Cumulative negative emissions (2050-2100) could increase from 7.5 GtCO2 in the Net-Zero scenario to 20.3 GtCO2 in equity-informed scenarios. By 2100, a CDR portfolio, including bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, and enhanced weathering could contribute up to ~500 MtCO2/year of removals. The projected average CDR growth rates, 2.8%-16%/year, align with the historical adoption rates of ammonia synthesis and biomass consumption in Canada, underscoring the importance of drawing lessons from past successes. Socio-economic and technological sensitivity analysis highlights that, despite variations in the role of individual CDR technologies, CDR remains essential for Canada’s post-net-zero commitments.
format Article
id doaj-art-4407aa3b2b4e47e28c2aeedbd649579c
institution Kabale University
issn 2662-4435
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Earth & Environment
spelling doaj-art-4407aa3b2b4e47e28c2aeedbd649579c2025-02-09T12:56:02ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Earth & Environment2662-44352025-02-016111710.1038/s43247-025-02080-zApplying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in CanadaKasra Motlaghzadeh0Neil Craik1Juan Moreno-Cruz2Vanessa Schweizer3Jay Fuhrman4Keith W. Hipel5Department of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of WaterlooWaterloo Climate Intervention Strategies Lab, University of WaterlooWaterloo Climate Intervention Strategies Lab, University of WaterlooWaterloo Climate Intervention Strategies Lab, University of WaterlooJoint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDepartment of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of WaterlooAbstract Despite net-zero pledges, consensus on national responsibilities for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategies is lacking. Here, we use integrated assessment modeling to examine equity-informed estimates of Canada’s remaining carbon budgets, exploring CDR’s role at net-zero and beyond. Gigaton-scale CDR efforts post-2050 are needed to address Canada’s carbon debt under various burden-sharing principles. Cumulative negative emissions (2050-2100) could increase from 7.5 GtCO2 in the Net-Zero scenario to 20.3 GtCO2 in equity-informed scenarios. By 2100, a CDR portfolio, including bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, and enhanced weathering could contribute up to ~500 MtCO2/year of removals. The projected average CDR growth rates, 2.8%-16%/year, align with the historical adoption rates of ammonia synthesis and biomass consumption in Canada, underscoring the importance of drawing lessons from past successes. Socio-economic and technological sensitivity analysis highlights that, despite variations in the role of individual CDR technologies, CDR remains essential for Canada’s post-net-zero commitments.https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02080-z
spellingShingle Kasra Motlaghzadeh
Neil Craik
Juan Moreno-Cruz
Vanessa Schweizer
Jay Fuhrman
Keith W. Hipel
Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada
Communications Earth & Environment
title Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada
title_full Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada
title_fullStr Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada
title_short Applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in Canada
title_sort applying equity principles leads to higher carbon removal obligations in canada
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02080-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kasramotlaghzadeh applyingequityprinciplesleadstohighercarbonremovalobligationsincanada
AT neilcraik applyingequityprinciplesleadstohighercarbonremovalobligationsincanada
AT juanmorenocruz applyingequityprinciplesleadstohighercarbonremovalobligationsincanada
AT vanessaschweizer applyingequityprinciplesleadstohighercarbonremovalobligationsincanada
AT jayfuhrman applyingequityprinciplesleadstohighercarbonremovalobligationsincanada
AT keithwhipel applyingequityprinciplesleadstohighercarbonremovalobligationsincanada