Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance
# Background The Y-Balance Test (YBT) assesses dynamic stability and neuromuscular control of the lower extremity. Several authors have analyzed kinematic predictors of YBT performance with conflicting results, but the influence of kinetic factors is not well understood. # Purpose To examine kine...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
North American Sports Medicine Institute
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.21492 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823857559791992832 |
|---|---|
| author | Samuel Nelson Charles S Wilson James Becker |
| author_facet | Samuel Nelson Charles S Wilson James Becker |
| author_sort | Samuel Nelson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | # Background
The Y-Balance Test (YBT) assesses dynamic stability and neuromuscular control of the lower extremity. Several authors have analyzed kinematic predictors of YBT performance with conflicting results, but the influence of kinetic factors is not well understood.
# Purpose
To examine kinematic predictors of YBT performance and determine the joint kinetics which predict YBT performance.
# Study Design
Cross-sectional study.
# Methods
Thirty-one physically active individuals performed YBT trials on a force plate while whole body kinematics were recorded using a motion capture system. Sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane joint kinematics and joint moments were calculated at maximum reach in each YBT reach direction. Variables correlated with reach distances at the *p* \< 0.2 level were entered into a stepwise linear regression.
# Results
In the anterior direction, knee flexion and torso rotation (*R^2^*=0.458, *p*\<0.001) and knee extensor and hip abductor moments (*R^2^*=0.461, *p*\<0.001) were the best kinematic and kinetic predictors of reach distance. In the posterior medial direction, hip flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and ankle rotation accounted for 45.8% of the variance in reach direction (*p*\<0.001) while hip and knee extensor, and hip abductor moments explained 72.6% of the variance in reach distance (*p*\<0.001). In the posterior lateral direction, hip flexion and pelvic rotation (*R^2^*=0.696, *p*\<.001) and hip extensor moments (*R^2^*=0.433, *p*=0.001) were the best kinematic and kinetic predictors of reach distance.
# Conclusion
The ability to generate large hip and knee joint moments in the sagittal and frontal plane are critical for YBT performance.
# Level of Evidence
3\. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-469ee9b318c742248835e2bb9872a0c5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2159-2896 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | North American Sports Medicine Institute |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| spelling | doaj-art-469ee9b318c742248835e2bb9872a0c52025-02-11T20:29:40ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962021-04-01162Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test PerformanceSamuel NelsonCharles S WilsonJames Becker# Background The Y-Balance Test (YBT) assesses dynamic stability and neuromuscular control of the lower extremity. Several authors have analyzed kinematic predictors of YBT performance with conflicting results, but the influence of kinetic factors is not well understood. # Purpose To examine kinematic predictors of YBT performance and determine the joint kinetics which predict YBT performance. # Study Design Cross-sectional study. # Methods Thirty-one physically active individuals performed YBT trials on a force plate while whole body kinematics were recorded using a motion capture system. Sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane joint kinematics and joint moments were calculated at maximum reach in each YBT reach direction. Variables correlated with reach distances at the *p* \< 0.2 level were entered into a stepwise linear regression. # Results In the anterior direction, knee flexion and torso rotation (*R^2^*=0.458, *p*\<0.001) and knee extensor and hip abductor moments (*R^2^*=0.461, *p*\<0.001) were the best kinematic and kinetic predictors of reach distance. In the posterior medial direction, hip flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and ankle rotation accounted for 45.8% of the variance in reach direction (*p*\<0.001) while hip and knee extensor, and hip abductor moments explained 72.6% of the variance in reach distance (*p*\<0.001). In the posterior lateral direction, hip flexion and pelvic rotation (*R^2^*=0.696, *p*\<.001) and hip extensor moments (*R^2^*=0.433, *p*=0.001) were the best kinematic and kinetic predictors of reach distance. # Conclusion The ability to generate large hip and knee joint moments in the sagittal and frontal plane are critical for YBT performance. # Level of Evidence 3\.https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.21492 |
| spellingShingle | Samuel Nelson Charles S Wilson James Becker Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| title | Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance |
| title_full | Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance |
| title_fullStr | Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance |
| title_short | Kinematic and Kinetic Predictors of Y-Balance Test Performance |
| title_sort | kinematic and kinetic predictors of y balance test performance |
| url | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.21492 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT samuelnelson kinematicandkineticpredictorsofybalancetestperformance AT charlesswilson kinematicandkineticpredictorsofybalancetestperformance AT jamesbecker kinematicandkineticpredictorsofybalancetestperformance |