Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates

Background: Angle fractures represent the highest percentage of mandibular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two miniplates fixation versus one plate fixation in the treatment of angle fractures. Material and Methods: The present study was carried out on 40...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University 2024-12-01
Series:Erbil Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/286
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823857414771834880
author Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
author_facet Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
author_sort Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
collection DOAJ
description Background: Angle fractures represent the highest percentage of mandibular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two miniplates fixation versus one plate fixation in the treatment of angle fractures. Material and Methods: The present study was carried out on 40 patients with fractures of the mandible angle region treated by open reduction and internal fixation with 2.0mm standard conventional mini plates. Subjects were selected and randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups, 20 patients for each. Group I, patients were treated by single miniplate at superior border of mandible by intraoral approach; Group II, patients were treated by one miniplate like in group I, plus another plate at the lateral aspect of angle, trans buccally by trocar and cannula. The patients were evaluated for duration of surgery, post operative infection, wound healing, neurosensory disturbance, occlusion, malunion, and hardware failure. Results: The complications were more in group 2 than in group 1. Disturbed occlusion was noted in 2 patients in group 2 and 3 patients of group 1. Infection occurred in 1 patient in group 1 and 2 patients in group 2. Preoperative/postoperative anesthesia was reported in 4/6 patients in group 1 and 5/7 patients of group2. No wound breakdown was seen in both groups. Screw loosening, necessitates removal of the plate, was noted in 3 patients of group 1 and one patient of group 2. Two patients’ group 1 showed delayed union and none of the patients in group 2 develop such complication. The difference in the complications between the two groups was not significant. Conclusions: There was no difference between the single- and double plate fixation regarding disturbed occlusion, infection, wound break down, lip paresthesia, hardware failure and malunion.
format Article
id doaj-art-4779ec6a0ee5415f8f1f45248a07d923
institution Kabale University
issn 2523-6172
2616-4795
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University
record_format Article
series Erbil Dental Journal
spelling doaj-art-4779ec6a0ee5415f8f1f45248a07d9232025-02-11T20:55:41ZengCollege Of Dentistry Hawler Medical UniversityErbil Dental Journal2523-61722616-47952024-12-017210.15218/edj.2024.20273Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double MiniplatesMustafa Rasul Muhammed0Erbil Medical Institute, Polytechnic University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Background: Angle fractures represent the highest percentage of mandibular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two miniplates fixation versus one plate fixation in the treatment of angle fractures. Material and Methods: The present study was carried out on 40 patients with fractures of the mandible angle region treated by open reduction and internal fixation with 2.0mm standard conventional mini plates. Subjects were selected and randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups, 20 patients for each. Group I, patients were treated by single miniplate at superior border of mandible by intraoral approach; Group II, patients were treated by one miniplate like in group I, plus another plate at the lateral aspect of angle, trans buccally by trocar and cannula. The patients were evaluated for duration of surgery, post operative infection, wound healing, neurosensory disturbance, occlusion, malunion, and hardware failure. Results: The complications were more in group 2 than in group 1. Disturbed occlusion was noted in 2 patients in group 2 and 3 patients of group 1. Infection occurred in 1 patient in group 1 and 2 patients in group 2. Preoperative/postoperative anesthesia was reported in 4/6 patients in group 1 and 5/7 patients of group2. No wound breakdown was seen in both groups. Screw loosening, necessitates removal of the plate, was noted in 3 patients of group 1 and one patient of group 2. Two patients’ group 1 showed delayed union and none of the patients in group 2 develop such complication. The difference in the complications between the two groups was not significant. Conclusions: There was no difference between the single- and double plate fixation regarding disturbed occlusion, infection, wound break down, lip paresthesia, hardware failure and malunion. https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/286Angle FracturesDouble plateMandible fractureMiniplateSingle plateTrans buccal approach
spellingShingle Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates
Erbil Dental Journal
Angle Fractures
Double plate
Mandible fracture
Miniplate
Single plate
Trans buccal approach
title Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates
title_sort clinical outcomes of mandibular angle fractures treated by single versus double miniplates
topic Angle Fractures
Double plate
Mandible fracture
Miniplate
Single plate
Trans buccal approach
url https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/286
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafarasulmuhammed clinicaloutcomesofmandibularanglefracturestreatedbysingleversusdoubleminiplates