Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair

Introduction: The superiority of laparoscopic repair over open repair of incisional hernias (IHs) in the elective setting is still controversial. Our study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open elective IH repair in an Asian population. Methods: This retrospective stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serene Si Ning Goh, Kaushal Amitbhai Sanghvi, Aaryan Nath Koura, Jaideepraj Krishnaraj Rao, Aung Myint Oo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications 2023-02-01
Series:Singapore Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2022005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861462883368960
author Serene Si Ning Goh
Kaushal Amitbhai Sanghvi
Aaryan Nath Koura
Jaideepraj Krishnaraj Rao
Aung Myint Oo
author_facet Serene Si Ning Goh
Kaushal Amitbhai Sanghvi
Aaryan Nath Koura
Jaideepraj Krishnaraj Rao
Aung Myint Oo
author_sort Serene Si Ning Goh
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The superiority of laparoscopic repair over open repair of incisional hernias (IHs) in the elective setting is still controversial. Our study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open elective IH repair in an Asian population. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in an acute general hospital in Singapore between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were IH repair in an elective setting, IHs with diameter of 3–15 cm, and location at the ventral abdominal wall. We excluded patients who underwent emergency repair, had recurrent hernias or had loss of abdominal wall domain (i.e. hernia sac containing more than 30% of abdominal contents or any solid organs). Postoperative outcomes within a year such as recurrence, pain, infection, haematoma and seroma formation were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 174 eligible patients. The majority were elderly Chinese women who were overweight. Open repair was performed in 49.4% of patients, while 50.6% underwent laparoscopic repair. The mean operation time for open repair was 116 minutes (116 ± 60.6 minutes) and 139 minutes (136 ± 64.1 minutes) for laparoscopic repair (P = 0.079). Within a year after open repair, postoperative wound infection occurred in 15.1% of the patients in the open repair group compared to 1.1% in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.0007). Postoperative pain, recurrence and haematoma/seroma formation were comparable. Conclusion: Elective laparoscopic IH repair has comparable outcomes with open repair and may offer the advantage of reduced postoperative wound infection rates.
format Article
id doaj-art-4b990e5cfb9b4d5bacd2e548411a7420
institution Kabale University
issn 0037-5675
2737-5935
language English
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Singapore Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-4b990e5cfb9b4d5bacd2e548411a74202025-02-09T13:43:14ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352023-02-0164210510810.11622/smedj.2022005Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repairSerene Si Ning GohKaushal Amitbhai SanghviAaryan Nath KouraJaideepraj Krishnaraj RaoAung Myint OoIntroduction: The superiority of laparoscopic repair over open repair of incisional hernias (IHs) in the elective setting is still controversial. Our study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open elective IH repair in an Asian population. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in an acute general hospital in Singapore between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were IH repair in an elective setting, IHs with diameter of 3–15 cm, and location at the ventral abdominal wall. We excluded patients who underwent emergency repair, had recurrent hernias or had loss of abdominal wall domain (i.e. hernia sac containing more than 30% of abdominal contents or any solid organs). Postoperative outcomes within a year such as recurrence, pain, infection, haematoma and seroma formation were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 174 eligible patients. The majority were elderly Chinese women who were overweight. Open repair was performed in 49.4% of patients, while 50.6% underwent laparoscopic repair. The mean operation time for open repair was 116 minutes (116 ± 60.6 minutes) and 139 minutes (136 ± 64.1 minutes) for laparoscopic repair (P = 0.079). Within a year after open repair, postoperative wound infection occurred in 15.1% of the patients in the open repair group compared to 1.1% in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.0007). Postoperative pain, recurrence and haematoma/seroma formation were comparable. Conclusion: Elective laparoscopic IH repair has comparable outcomes with open repair and may offer the advantage of reduced postoperative wound infection rates.https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2022005electiveincisional hernia repairlaparoscopicopenpostoperative wound infection
spellingShingle Serene Si Ning Goh
Kaushal Amitbhai Sanghvi
Aaryan Nath Koura
Jaideepraj Krishnaraj Rao
Aung Myint Oo
Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
Singapore Medical Journal
elective
incisional hernia repair
laparoscopic
open
postoperative wound infection
title Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
title_full Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
title_fullStr Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
title_full_unstemmed Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
title_short Elective incisional hernia repair: lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
title_sort elective incisional hernia repair lower risk of postoperative wound infection with laparoscopic versus open repair
topic elective
incisional hernia repair
laparoscopic
open
postoperative wound infection
url https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2022005
work_keys_str_mv AT serenesininggoh electiveincisionalherniarepairlowerriskofpostoperativewoundinfectionwithlaparoscopicversusopenrepair
AT kaushalamitbhaisanghvi electiveincisionalherniarepairlowerriskofpostoperativewoundinfectionwithlaparoscopicversusopenrepair
AT aaryannathkoura electiveincisionalherniarepairlowerriskofpostoperativewoundinfectionwithlaparoscopicversusopenrepair
AT jaideeprajkrishnarajrao electiveincisionalherniarepairlowerriskofpostoperativewoundinfectionwithlaparoscopicversusopenrepair
AT aungmyintoo electiveincisionalherniarepairlowerriskofpostoperativewoundinfectionwithlaparoscopicversusopenrepair