Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients

Abstract This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Kyu Yang, Seong Jung Ha, Gye Jung Kim, Junhyeok Ock, Namkug Kim, Ho-Seok Sa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84166-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862161171021824
author Min Kyu Yang
Seong Jung Ha
Gye Jung Kim
Junhyeok Ock
Namkug Kim
Ho-Seok Sa
author_facet Min Kyu Yang
Seong Jung Ha
Gye Jung Kim
Junhyeok Ock
Namkug Kim
Ho-Seok Sa
author_sort Min Kyu Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PSI. Computed tomography scans were used to compare the orbital tissue volumes and the morphological similarity (root-mean-square [RMS] conformance distance) between the fractured wall and the mirrored counterpart before and after surgery. All orbital fractures (inferior wall, 19; medial wall, 9; and combined inferior and medial walls, 12) were successfully repaired without postoperative complications. The mean time for implant insertion during surgery was 19.8 s (range, 3–60). The mean orbital tissue volume ratio between the fractured orbit and the contralateral normal orbit significantly decreased after surgery (109.0% preoperatively vs. 100.6% at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, paired t-test). The median RMS conformance distance significantly decreased after surgery (3.426 mm preoperatively vs. 1.073 mm at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Our findings suggest that using a 3D-printed PCL PSI could effectively restore the original volume and shape of the orbit, thus being a valuable addition to the surgeon’s armamentarium for managing orbital wall fractures.
format Article
id doaj-art-4f953194674049c59675ba560dca3f1b
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-4f953194674049c59675ba560dca3f1b2025-02-09T12:36:18ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-011511810.1038/s41598-024-84166-wEfficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patientsMin Kyu Yang0Seong Jung Ha1Gye Jung Kim2Junhyeok Ock3Namkug Kim4Ho-Seok Sa5Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Myongji HospitalDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineAbstract This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PSI. Computed tomography scans were used to compare the orbital tissue volumes and the morphological similarity (root-mean-square [RMS] conformance distance) between the fractured wall and the mirrored counterpart before and after surgery. All orbital fractures (inferior wall, 19; medial wall, 9; and combined inferior and medial walls, 12) were successfully repaired without postoperative complications. The mean time for implant insertion during surgery was 19.8 s (range, 3–60). The mean orbital tissue volume ratio between the fractured orbit and the contralateral normal orbit significantly decreased after surgery (109.0% preoperatively vs. 100.6% at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, paired t-test). The median RMS conformance distance significantly decreased after surgery (3.426 mm preoperatively vs. 1.073 mm at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Our findings suggest that using a 3D-printed PCL PSI could effectively restore the original volume and shape of the orbit, thus being a valuable addition to the surgeon’s armamentarium for managing orbital wall fractures.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84166-w3D-printedCustomisedImplantOrbital wall fracture
spellingShingle Min Kyu Yang
Seong Jung Ha
Gye Jung Kim
Junhyeok Ock
Namkug Kim
Ho-Seok Sa
Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
Scientific Reports
3D-printed
Customised
Implant
Orbital wall fracture
title Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
title_full Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
title_fullStr Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
title_short Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
title_sort efficacy of 3d printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
topic 3D-printed
Customised
Implant
Orbital wall fracture
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84166-w
work_keys_str_mv AT minkyuyang efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients
AT seongjungha efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients
AT gyejungkim efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients
AT junhyeokock efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients
AT namkugkim efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients
AT hoseoksa efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients