Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients
Abstract This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PS...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84166-w |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823862161171021824 |
---|---|
author | Min Kyu Yang Seong Jung Ha Gye Jung Kim Junhyeok Ock Namkug Kim Ho-Seok Sa |
author_facet | Min Kyu Yang Seong Jung Ha Gye Jung Kim Junhyeok Ock Namkug Kim Ho-Seok Sa |
author_sort | Min Kyu Yang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PSI. Computed tomography scans were used to compare the orbital tissue volumes and the morphological similarity (root-mean-square [RMS] conformance distance) between the fractured wall and the mirrored counterpart before and after surgery. All orbital fractures (inferior wall, 19; medial wall, 9; and combined inferior and medial walls, 12) were successfully repaired without postoperative complications. The mean time for implant insertion during surgery was 19.8 s (range, 3–60). The mean orbital tissue volume ratio between the fractured orbit and the contralateral normal orbit significantly decreased after surgery (109.0% preoperatively vs. 100.6% at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, paired t-test). The median RMS conformance distance significantly decreased after surgery (3.426 mm preoperatively vs. 1.073 mm at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Our findings suggest that using a 3D-printed PCL PSI could effectively restore the original volume and shape of the orbit, thus being a valuable addition to the surgeon’s armamentarium for managing orbital wall fractures. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4f953194674049c59675ba560dca3f1b |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj-art-4f953194674049c59675ba560dca3f1b2025-02-09T12:36:18ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-011511810.1038/s41598-024-84166-wEfficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patientsMin Kyu Yang0Seong Jung Ha1Gye Jung Kim2Junhyeok Ock3Namkug Kim4Ho-Seok Sa5Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Myongji HospitalDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineAbstract This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PSI. Computed tomography scans were used to compare the orbital tissue volumes and the morphological similarity (root-mean-square [RMS] conformance distance) between the fractured wall and the mirrored counterpart before and after surgery. All orbital fractures (inferior wall, 19; medial wall, 9; and combined inferior and medial walls, 12) were successfully repaired without postoperative complications. The mean time for implant insertion during surgery was 19.8 s (range, 3–60). The mean orbital tissue volume ratio between the fractured orbit and the contralateral normal orbit significantly decreased after surgery (109.0% preoperatively vs. 100.6% at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, paired t-test). The median RMS conformance distance significantly decreased after surgery (3.426 mm preoperatively vs. 1.073 mm at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Our findings suggest that using a 3D-printed PCL PSI could effectively restore the original volume and shape of the orbit, thus being a valuable addition to the surgeon’s armamentarium for managing orbital wall fractures.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84166-w3D-printedCustomisedImplantOrbital wall fracture |
spellingShingle | Min Kyu Yang Seong Jung Ha Gye Jung Kim Junhyeok Ock Namkug Kim Ho-Seok Sa Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients Scientific Reports 3D-printed Customised Implant Orbital wall fracture |
title | Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients |
title_full | Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients |
title_short | Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients |
title_sort | efficacy of 3d printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients |
topic | 3D-printed Customised Implant Orbital wall fracture |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84166-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minkyuyang efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients AT seongjungha efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients AT gyejungkim efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients AT junhyeokock efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients AT namkugkim efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients AT hoseoksa efficacyof3dprintedpatientspecificimplantfororbitalwallfracturerepairinaseriesof40patients |