Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields
Soil microorganisms are key to the flow of carbon through soils. As the most carbon-rich soils, Mollisols are very sensitive to disturbance and more prone to be carbon sources than carbon sinks. To understand how the microbial physiology [i.e., microbial growth, respiration, carbon use efficiency (C...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Geoderma |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125000497 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823861253594939392 |
---|---|
author | Peng Chen Junzeng Xu Kechun Wang Zhongxue Zhang Zhaoqiang Zhou Yawei Li Tiecheng Li Tangzhe Nie Qi Wei Linxian Liao |
author_facet | Peng Chen Junzeng Xu Kechun Wang Zhongxue Zhang Zhaoqiang Zhou Yawei Li Tiecheng Li Tangzhe Nie Qi Wei Linxian Liao |
author_sort | Peng Chen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Soil microorganisms are key to the flow of carbon through soils. As the most carbon-rich soils, Mollisols are very sensitive to disturbance and more prone to be carbon sources than carbon sinks. To understand how the microbial physiology [i.e., microbial growth, respiration, carbon use efficiency (CUE) and biomass turnover] of Mollisols responds to different management protocols, and to evaluate their carbon sequestration potential, we examined microbial anabolism, catabolism and necromass accumulation in Mollisols paddy fields under four treatments: (i) controlled irrigation + rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw removal (CI), (ii) flooded irrigation + rice straw removal (FI), (iii) controlled irrigation + rice straw return (CI-SR), and (iv) flooded irrigation + rice straw return (FI-SR). Microbial physiology was determined by a substrate-independent H218O labeling method. Microbial necromass accumulation was quantified by the biomarker analysis of amino sugars. Water-saving irrigation increased microbial CUE and accelerated microbial growth and turnover. Moreover, by providing sufficient substrate, straw return further accelerated microbial growth, while promoted microbial respiration. The rise of microbial respiration under straw return was proportionally less than that of microbial growth. The accelerated production or turnover of microbial biomass was expected to increase microbial biomass and necromass. Straw return significantly increased the microbial biomass and necromass, especially under the controlled irrigation. Compared with the other treatments, the greatest increase in soil microbial necromass C (21.24–39.26 %) and microbial biomass C (8.65–26.09 %) occurred under CI-SR. Despite this treatment enhancing microbial respiration, strong positive correlations were found between soil organic carbon (SOC) content and both microbial growth rate and necromass accumulation. The CI-SR treatment strengthened microbial roles in Mollisols paddy fields by enhancing the net flux of microbial biomass formation, and consequently promoting the incorporation of greater amounts of microbial-derived C in the SOC pool. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-5adde6f055764af5bd3fd4566426c7eb |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1872-6259 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Geoderma |
spelling | doaj-art-5adde6f055764af5bd3fd4566426c7eb2025-02-10T04:33:27ZengElsevierGeoderma1872-62592025-02-01454117211Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fieldsPeng Chen0Junzeng Xu1Kechun Wang2Zhongxue Zhang3Zhaoqiang Zhou4Yawei Li5Tiecheng Li6Tangzhe Nie7Qi Wei8Linxian Liao9The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098 China; College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098 ChinaThe National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098 China; College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Soil-Water Efficient Utilization, Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Corresponding author at: The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Soil-Water Efficient Utilization, Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 ChinaSchool of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030 ChinaSchool of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030 ChinaCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Soil-Water Efficient Utilization, Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 ChinaSchool of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030 ChinaSchool of Water Conservancy and Electric Power, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080 ChinaCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Soil-Water Efficient Utilization, Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 ChinaCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Soil-Water Efficient Utilization, Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100 ChinaSoil microorganisms are key to the flow of carbon through soils. As the most carbon-rich soils, Mollisols are very sensitive to disturbance and more prone to be carbon sources than carbon sinks. To understand how the microbial physiology [i.e., microbial growth, respiration, carbon use efficiency (CUE) and biomass turnover] of Mollisols responds to different management protocols, and to evaluate their carbon sequestration potential, we examined microbial anabolism, catabolism and necromass accumulation in Mollisols paddy fields under four treatments: (i) controlled irrigation + rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw removal (CI), (ii) flooded irrigation + rice straw removal (FI), (iii) controlled irrigation + rice straw return (CI-SR), and (iv) flooded irrigation + rice straw return (FI-SR). Microbial physiology was determined by a substrate-independent H218O labeling method. Microbial necromass accumulation was quantified by the biomarker analysis of amino sugars. Water-saving irrigation increased microbial CUE and accelerated microbial growth and turnover. Moreover, by providing sufficient substrate, straw return further accelerated microbial growth, while promoted microbial respiration. The rise of microbial respiration under straw return was proportionally less than that of microbial growth. The accelerated production or turnover of microbial biomass was expected to increase microbial biomass and necromass. Straw return significantly increased the microbial biomass and necromass, especially under the controlled irrigation. Compared with the other treatments, the greatest increase in soil microbial necromass C (21.24–39.26 %) and microbial biomass C (8.65–26.09 %) occurred under CI-SR. Despite this treatment enhancing microbial respiration, strong positive correlations were found between soil organic carbon (SOC) content and both microbial growth rate and necromass accumulation. The CI-SR treatment strengthened microbial roles in Mollisols paddy fields by enhancing the net flux of microbial biomass formation, and consequently promoting the incorporation of greater amounts of microbial-derived C in the SOC pool.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125000497MollisolsWater-saving irrigationStraw returnCarbon use efficiencyMicrobial growth rateMicrobial necromass |
spellingShingle | Peng Chen Junzeng Xu Kechun Wang Zhongxue Zhang Zhaoqiang Zhou Yawei Li Tiecheng Li Tangzhe Nie Qi Wei Linxian Liao Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields Geoderma Mollisols Water-saving irrigation Straw return Carbon use efficiency Microbial growth rate Microbial necromass |
title | Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields |
title_full | Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields |
title_fullStr | Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields |
title_full_unstemmed | Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields |
title_short | Straw return combined with water-saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth-turnover in Mollisols of paddy fields |
title_sort | straw return combined with water saving irrigation increases microbial necromass accumulation by accelerating microbial growth turnover in mollisols of paddy fields |
topic | Mollisols Water-saving irrigation Straw return Carbon use efficiency Microbial growth rate Microbial necromass |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125000497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengchen strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT junzengxu strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT kechunwang strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT zhongxuezhang strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT zhaoqiangzhou strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT yaweili strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT tiechengli strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT tangzhenie strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT qiwei strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields AT linxianliao strawreturncombinedwithwatersavingirrigationincreasesmicrobialnecromassaccumulationbyacceleratingmicrobialgrowthturnoverinmollisolsofpaddyfields |