Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study
Background: 3D printing technology is replacing manual fabrication in all fields. 3D-printed impression trays should be assessed as they could replace conventional impression trays in the future. Aim: In-vitro comparison and evaluation of the dimensional stability and retention strength of impressio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_519_23 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825202064721969152 |
|---|---|
| author | K Sangeetha Priyadarshini V Vidyashree Nandini Russia Marimuthu Jailance Lathief |
| author_facet | K Sangeetha Priyadarshini V Vidyashree Nandini Russia Marimuthu Jailance Lathief |
| author_sort | K Sangeetha Priyadarshini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background:
3D printing technology is replacing manual fabrication in all fields. 3D-printed impression trays should be assessed as they could replace conventional impression trays in the future.
Aim:
In-vitro comparison and evaluation of the dimensional stability and retention strength of impressions to custom impression trays fabricated using conventional method and additive technology.
Materials and Methods:
A maxillary edentulous auto-polymerizing acrylic resin model served as the master model. Two moulds were prepared from the master model in order to obtain 12 casts. One cast was scanned for 3D printing digital light processing (DLP) and fused deposition modelling (FDM) 24 impression trays using polylactic acid (PLA). Twelve casts were used to fabricate light cure impression trays. Polyvinyl-siloxane impressions were made on the master model using 36 impression trays and 18 trays each were used to assess dimensional stability and retention strength.
Results:
In dimensional stability analysis, one sample t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between each group and the master model followed by a one-way ANOVA. There were significant differences, but the difference was less with FDM trays (P < 0.05). In retention strength analysis, one-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed statistically significant difference between each group and post-hoc test revealed specific difference, the highest with FDM trays (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Dimensional changes were observed at 30 minutes and 72 hours. Lesser dimensional changes were observed when impressions were made using FDM trays followed by DLP and light cure trays. The mean retention strength seen in descending order was FDM, followed by DLP and light cure trays. The best retention strength was noticed when impressions were made using FDM trays. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5b088873ae744778aed4a38afd961ced |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-5b088873ae744778aed4a38afd961ced2025-02-07T15:31:46ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032023-10-0134442743210.4103/ijdr.ijdr_519_23Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro StudyK Sangeetha PriyadarshiniV Vidyashree NandiniRussia MarimuthuJailance LathiefBackground: 3D printing technology is replacing manual fabrication in all fields. 3D-printed impression trays should be assessed as they could replace conventional impression trays in the future. Aim: In-vitro comparison and evaluation of the dimensional stability and retention strength of impressions to custom impression trays fabricated using conventional method and additive technology. Materials and Methods: A maxillary edentulous auto-polymerizing acrylic resin model served as the master model. Two moulds were prepared from the master model in order to obtain 12 casts. One cast was scanned for 3D printing digital light processing (DLP) and fused deposition modelling (FDM) 24 impression trays using polylactic acid (PLA). Twelve casts were used to fabricate light cure impression trays. Polyvinyl-siloxane impressions were made on the master model using 36 impression trays and 18 trays each were used to assess dimensional stability and retention strength. Results: In dimensional stability analysis, one sample t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between each group and the master model followed by a one-way ANOVA. There were significant differences, but the difference was less with FDM trays (P < 0.05). In retention strength analysis, one-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed statistically significant difference between each group and post-hoc test revealed specific difference, the highest with FDM trays (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Dimensional changes were observed at 30 minutes and 72 hours. Lesser dimensional changes were observed when impressions were made using FDM trays followed by DLP and light cure trays. The mean retention strength seen in descending order was FDM, followed by DLP and light cure trays. The best retention strength was noticed when impressions were made using FDM trays.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_519_233d-printed impression traysadditive technologycad-camdigital light processing (dlp)fused deposition modelling (fdm) |
| spellingShingle | K Sangeetha Priyadarshini V Vidyashree Nandini Russia Marimuthu Jailance Lathief Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study Indian Journal of Dental Research 3d-printed impression trays additive technology cad-cam digital light processing (dlp) fused deposition modelling (fdm) |
| title | Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study |
| title_full | Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study |
| title_short | Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study |
| title_sort | dimensional stability and retention strength of impressions to custom impression trays fabricated using conventional method and additive technology an in vitro study |
| topic | 3d-printed impression trays additive technology cad-cam digital light processing (dlp) fused deposition modelling (fdm) |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_519_23 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ksangeethapriyadarshini dimensionalstabilityandretentionstrengthofimpressionstocustomimpressiontraysfabricatedusingconventionalmethodandadditivetechnologyaninvitrostudy AT vvidyashreenandini dimensionalstabilityandretentionstrengthofimpressionstocustomimpressiontraysfabricatedusingconventionalmethodandadditivetechnologyaninvitrostudy AT russiamarimuthu dimensionalstabilityandretentionstrengthofimpressionstocustomimpressiontraysfabricatedusingconventionalmethodandadditivetechnologyaninvitrostudy AT jailancelathief dimensionalstabilityandretentionstrengthofimpressionstocustomimpressiontraysfabricatedusingconventionalmethodandadditivetechnologyaninvitrostudy |