Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study
**Background:** There is variation in uptake of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) between countries, and Australia has high incidence rates of IVF due to universal public funding. However, it remains unclear whether there is regional variation and, if present, what might cause this. **Objectives:** We s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
2017-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.36469/9795 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823860345250250752 |
|---|---|
| author | Louise Rawlings Pauline Ding Stephen J. Robson |
| author_facet | Louise Rawlings Pauline Ding Stephen J. Robson |
| author_sort | Louise Rawlings |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | **Background:** There is variation in uptake of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) between countries, and Australia has high incidence rates of IVF due to universal public funding. However, it remains unclear whether there is regional variation and, if present, what might cause this.
**Objectives:** We sought to determine whether regional variations in treatment rates existed and what might influence these.
**Methods:** The number of cycles of fresh IVF and intrauterine insemination (IUI) for women were obtained for the period 2011 until 2014 in two age groups (25 to 34 years and 35 to 44 years) to calculate incidence rates. Proxy indicators that might influence treatment affordability were: unemployment rates; average weekly total earnings; coverage of private health insurance; and, percentage of women in the highest socioeconomic quintile. Measures of accessibility considered were percentage of the population remote from urban areas and average state population density. Linear regressions were performed using log-transformed ratio of IVF and IUI incidence rates.
**Results:** Variations were found in IVF uptake between states with greater differences in older women. There was no significant association between IVF procedures and population density or geographic isolation. Economic factors were not associated with IVF uptake.
**Conclusion:** These findings suggest that factors such as physician preference, clinical practice guidelines, and cryopreservation protocols of ART units might explain the national variation in uptake of IVF. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5f67073846684d24b26cc841d7fda6de |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2327-2236 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
| publisher | Columbia Data Analytics, LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-5f67073846684d24b26cc841d7fda6de2025-02-10T16:12:45ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362017-03-0151Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based StudyLouise RawlingsPauline DingStephen J. Robson**Background:** There is variation in uptake of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) between countries, and Australia has high incidence rates of IVF due to universal public funding. However, it remains unclear whether there is regional variation and, if present, what might cause this. **Objectives:** We sought to determine whether regional variations in treatment rates existed and what might influence these. **Methods:** The number of cycles of fresh IVF and intrauterine insemination (IUI) for women were obtained for the period 2011 until 2014 in two age groups (25 to 34 years and 35 to 44 years) to calculate incidence rates. Proxy indicators that might influence treatment affordability were: unemployment rates; average weekly total earnings; coverage of private health insurance; and, percentage of women in the highest socioeconomic quintile. Measures of accessibility considered were percentage of the population remote from urban areas and average state population density. Linear regressions were performed using log-transformed ratio of IVF and IUI incidence rates. **Results:** Variations were found in IVF uptake between states with greater differences in older women. There was no significant association between IVF procedures and population density or geographic isolation. Economic factors were not associated with IVF uptake. **Conclusion:** These findings suggest that factors such as physician preference, clinical practice guidelines, and cryopreservation protocols of ART units might explain the national variation in uptake of IVF.https://doi.org/10.36469/9795 |
| spellingShingle | Louise Rawlings Pauline Ding Stephen J. Robson Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research |
| title | Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study |
| title_full | Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study |
| title_fullStr | Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study |
| title_short | Regional Variation in Rates of IVF Treatment across Australia: A Population-based Study |
| title_sort | regional variation in rates of ivf treatment across australia a population based study |
| url | https://doi.org/10.36469/9795 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT louiserawlings regionalvariationinratesofivftreatmentacrossaustraliaapopulationbasedstudy AT paulineding regionalvariationinratesofivftreatmentacrossaustraliaapopulationbasedstudy AT stephenjrobson regionalvariationinratesofivftreatmentacrossaustraliaapopulationbasedstudy |