Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix

Our previous work investigated the templating ability of graphene oxide-derived additives to induce graphitization of the novolac matrix. The findings led to two working hypotheses: the additives act as templates that promote matrix aromatic alignment to their basal planes during carbonization (refe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra N Ike, Randy Vander Wal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:Carbon Trends
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056925000306
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823864241467162624
author Sandra N Ike
Randy Vander Wal
author_facet Sandra N Ike
Randy Vander Wal
author_sort Sandra N Ike
collection DOAJ
description Our previous work investigated the templating ability of graphene oxide-derived additives to induce graphitization of the novolac matrix. The findings led to two working hypotheses: the additives act as templates that promote matrix aromatic alignment to their basal planes during carbonization (referred to here as physical templating) in addition to forming radical edge sites that bond to the decomposing matrix (referred to here as chemical templating). However, results mainly underscored the role of functional groups on the GO additives (chemical templating). The aim of this current work seeks to differentiate the contributions of the operative mechanisms on graphitization. To study this, 2D materials with minimal oxygen functionalization, graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) were used as templates to induce graphitization of novolac matrix. First, the optimum weight percent of the 2D materials was determined with the composite graphitic quality measured by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Results revealed that hBN did not induce graphitization of novolac and was attributed to the absence of a sp² framework in hBN, unable to provide the crucial π-π interactions with the aromatic rings of the matrix. In contrast, the graphene additives mirrored one another and showed improved graphitization of the novolac. From these results, it was surmised that both mechanisms are operative; while physical templating offers control over long-range order in the form of crystallite height, chemical templating contributes to carbon reorganization and lateral growth extent.
format Article
id doaj-art-61ac9beeaa894f1aa2f455445e4817c4
institution Kabale University
issn 2667-0569
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Carbon Trends
spelling doaj-art-61ac9beeaa894f1aa2f455445e4817c42025-02-09T05:01:39ZengElsevierCarbon Trends2667-05692025-04-0119100480Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrixSandra N Ike0Randy Vander Wal1The John and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering Penn State University, 16801, USA; EMS Energy Institute, Penn State University, 16801, USA; Corresponding author.The John and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering Penn State University, 16801, USA; EMS Energy Institute, Penn State University, 16801, USAOur previous work investigated the templating ability of graphene oxide-derived additives to induce graphitization of the novolac matrix. The findings led to two working hypotheses: the additives act as templates that promote matrix aromatic alignment to their basal planes during carbonization (referred to here as physical templating) in addition to forming radical edge sites that bond to the decomposing matrix (referred to here as chemical templating). However, results mainly underscored the role of functional groups on the GO additives (chemical templating). The aim of this current work seeks to differentiate the contributions of the operative mechanisms on graphitization. To study this, 2D materials with minimal oxygen functionalization, graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) were used as templates to induce graphitization of novolac matrix. First, the optimum weight percent of the 2D materials was determined with the composite graphitic quality measured by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Results revealed that hBN did not induce graphitization of novolac and was attributed to the absence of a sp² framework in hBN, unable to provide the crucial π-π interactions with the aromatic rings of the matrix. In contrast, the graphene additives mirrored one another and showed improved graphitization of the novolac. From these results, it was surmised that both mechanisms are operative; while physical templating offers control over long-range order in the form of crystallite height, chemical templating contributes to carbon reorganization and lateral growth extent.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056925000306GrapheneHexagonal boron nitride (hBN)NovolacPhysical templatingChemical templatingGraphitization
spellingShingle Sandra N Ike
Randy Vander Wal
Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
Carbon Trends
Graphene
Hexagonal boron nitride (hBN)
Novolac
Physical templating
Chemical templating
Graphitization
title Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
title_full Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
title_fullStr Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
title_full_unstemmed Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
title_short Distinguishing physical vs. chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
title_sort distinguishing physical vs chemical templating mechanisms for inducing graphitization in novolac matrix
topic Graphene
Hexagonal boron nitride (hBN)
Novolac
Physical templating
Chemical templating
Graphitization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056925000306
work_keys_str_mv AT sandranike distinguishingphysicalvschemicaltemplatingmechanismsforinducinggraphitizationinnovolacmatrix
AT randyvanderwal distinguishingphysicalvschemicaltemplatingmechanismsforinducinggraphitizationinnovolacmatrix