A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions

Aim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the retention of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). Materials and methods: A total of thirty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sapna Rani, Pankaj Dhawan, Vidushi Saxena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001829
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823864403504660480
author Sapna Rani
Pankaj Dhawan
Vidushi Saxena
author_facet Sapna Rani
Pankaj Dhawan
Vidushi Saxena
author_sort Sapna Rani
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the retention of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). Materials and methods: A total of thirty (n = 30) completely edentulous patients were randomly distributed into two groups: Group-C (n = 15) (Conventional) and Group-T (n = 15) (bioelectric). In Group C, border molding was performed using the manual manipulation of borders, and the final impression was made using zinc-oxide eugenol. In Group T, border molding and final impression were performed with the TENS application. Dentures were fabricated, and retention was evaluated with a digital gauge. OHRQoL was assessed at insertion and after three months of follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile Edentulous in Hindi (OHIP-Edent-H) questionnaire. A two-way ANOVA test was used for the significance level (P < 0.05). Student t-test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired t-test was used for intragroup comparison of OHRQoL. Results: There was no significant difference in the retention of maxillary and mandibular dentures fabricated with both techniques (P = 0.283, P = 0.682). Although, OHRQoL increased significantly in both groups at follow-up (P = 0.001). However, at follow-up, the Functional Limitation (FL) domain was significantly better in the conventional group. Conclusions: Although, there was no significant difference in retention and OHRQoL between both groups. However, more clinical trials with large samples and longer follow-ups are required to reach a conclusive result.
format Article
id doaj-art-66d65af3c7374148abbb5ab5eb143e9e
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-66d65af3c7374148abbb5ab5eb143e9e2025-02-09T05:00:11ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682025-01-01151103107A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressionsSapna Rani0Pankaj Dhawan1Vidushi Saxena2Corresponding author. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Surajkund Road Sec 43, Aravali Hills, Delhi, India.; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaAim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the retention of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). Materials and methods: A total of thirty (n = 30) completely edentulous patients were randomly distributed into two groups: Group-C (n = 15) (Conventional) and Group-T (n = 15) (bioelectric). In Group C, border molding was performed using the manual manipulation of borders, and the final impression was made using zinc-oxide eugenol. In Group T, border molding and final impression were performed with the TENS application. Dentures were fabricated, and retention was evaluated with a digital gauge. OHRQoL was assessed at insertion and after three months of follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile Edentulous in Hindi (OHIP-Edent-H) questionnaire. A two-way ANOVA test was used for the significance level (P < 0.05). Student t-test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired t-test was used for intragroup comparison of OHRQoL. Results: There was no significant difference in the retention of maxillary and mandibular dentures fabricated with both techniques (P = 0.283, P = 0.682). Although, OHRQoL increased significantly in both groups at follow-up (P = 0.001). However, at follow-up, the Functional Limitation (FL) domain was significantly better in the conventional group. Conclusions: Although, there was no significant difference in retention and OHRQoL between both groups. However, more clinical trials with large samples and longer follow-ups are required to reach a conclusive result.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001829
spellingShingle Sapna Rani
Pankaj Dhawan
Vidushi Saxena
A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
title A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
title_full A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
title_fullStr A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
title_short A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
title_sort randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001829
work_keys_str_mv AT sapnarani arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions
AT pankajdhawan arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions
AT vidushisaxena arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions
AT sapnarani randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions
AT pankajdhawan randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions
AT vidushisaxena randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions