A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions
Aim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the retention of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). Materials and methods: A total of thirty...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001829 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823864403504660480 |
---|---|
author | Sapna Rani Pankaj Dhawan Vidushi Saxena |
author_facet | Sapna Rani Pankaj Dhawan Vidushi Saxena |
author_sort | Sapna Rani |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the retention of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). Materials and methods: A total of thirty (n = 30) completely edentulous patients were randomly distributed into two groups: Group-C (n = 15) (Conventional) and Group-T (n = 15) (bioelectric). In Group C, border molding was performed using the manual manipulation of borders, and the final impression was made using zinc-oxide eugenol. In Group T, border molding and final impression were performed with the TENS application. Dentures were fabricated, and retention was evaluated with a digital gauge. OHRQoL was assessed at insertion and after three months of follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile Edentulous in Hindi (OHIP-Edent-H) questionnaire. A two-way ANOVA test was used for the significance level (P < 0.05). Student t-test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired t-test was used for intragroup comparison of OHRQoL. Results: There was no significant difference in the retention of maxillary and mandibular dentures fabricated with both techniques (P = 0.283, P = 0.682). Although, OHRQoL increased significantly in both groups at follow-up (P = 0.001). However, at follow-up, the Functional Limitation (FL) domain was significantly better in the conventional group. Conclusions: Although, there was no significant difference in retention and OHRQoL between both groups. However, more clinical trials with large samples and longer follow-ups are required to reach a conclusive result. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-66d65af3c7374148abbb5ab5eb143e9e |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2212-4268 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
spelling | doaj-art-66d65af3c7374148abbb5ab5eb143e9e2025-02-09T05:00:11ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682025-01-01151103107A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressionsSapna Rani0Pankaj Dhawan1Vidushi Saxena2Corresponding author. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Surajkund Road Sec 43, Aravali Hills, Delhi, India.; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaAim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the retention of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). Materials and methods: A total of thirty (n = 30) completely edentulous patients were randomly distributed into two groups: Group-C (n = 15) (Conventional) and Group-T (n = 15) (bioelectric). In Group C, border molding was performed using the manual manipulation of borders, and the final impression was made using zinc-oxide eugenol. In Group T, border molding and final impression were performed with the TENS application. Dentures were fabricated, and retention was evaluated with a digital gauge. OHRQoL was assessed at insertion and after three months of follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile Edentulous in Hindi (OHIP-Edent-H) questionnaire. A two-way ANOVA test was used for the significance level (P < 0.05). Student t-test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired t-test was used for intragroup comparison of OHRQoL. Results: There was no significant difference in the retention of maxillary and mandibular dentures fabricated with both techniques (P = 0.283, P = 0.682). Although, OHRQoL increased significantly in both groups at follow-up (P = 0.001). However, at follow-up, the Functional Limitation (FL) domain was significantly better in the conventional group. Conclusions: Although, there was no significant difference in retention and OHRQoL between both groups. However, more clinical trials with large samples and longer follow-ups are required to reach a conclusive result.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001829 |
spellingShingle | Sapna Rani Pankaj Dhawan Vidushi Saxena A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
title | A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions |
title_full | A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions |
title_fullStr | A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions |
title_short | A randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions |
title_sort | randomized clinical trial comparing retention of complete dentures and oral health quality of life of patients with conventional and bioelectric impressions |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sapnarani arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions AT pankajdhawan arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions AT vidushisaxena arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions AT sapnarani randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions AT pankajdhawan randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions AT vidushisaxena randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingretentionofcompletedenturesandoralhealthqualityoflifeofpatientswithconventionalandbioelectricimpressions |