Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>A recent resurgence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is placing a major burden on high-risk populations, physicians, and the healthcare system. Treatment in the form of antibiotic pre-exposure prophylaxis (STI PrEP) is a potential solution. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie-Anne Carroll, Amy B Mullens, Sarah Warzywoda, Philip R A Baker, Meika Stafford, Faye McMillan, Jacintha Manton, Daniel Demant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317669
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823856742704873472
author Julie-Anne Carroll
Amy B Mullens
Sarah Warzywoda
Philip R A Baker
Meika Stafford
Faye McMillan
Jacintha Manton
Daniel Demant
author_facet Julie-Anne Carroll
Amy B Mullens
Sarah Warzywoda
Philip R A Baker
Meika Stafford
Faye McMillan
Jacintha Manton
Daniel Demant
author_sort Julie-Anne Carroll
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>A recent resurgence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is placing a major burden on high-risk populations, physicians, and the healthcare system. Treatment in the form of antibiotic pre-exposure prophylaxis (STI PrEP) is a potential solution. However, little is known about the acceptability and feasibility of this approach in high-risk populations.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed in October 2024 across six databases adhering to PRISMA guidelines.<h4>Results</h4>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were all conducted in high-income countries, used various methods, and all focussed on sexual minority men. Findings consistently identified moderate to high levels of acceptability among GBMSM (54.3% - 67.5%). Factors such as engagement in perceived 'high risk' sexual encounters, and past diagnosis of STIs strengthened acceptability, while others (e.g., antimicrobial resistance concerns and stigma) act as barriers. Only one study included the perspectives of healthcare workers, indicating a moderate willingness to prescribe, which would increase under governing-body endorsement.<h4>Discussion</h4>Overall, while there is some promise of STI PrEP acceptability among GBMSM, vast gaps in knowledge remain. Knowledge transfer and feasibility and, hence, the sustainability and capacity needed for the success of STI PrEP is yet to be examined and understood. However, for STI PrEP to be successfully adopted, it is essential not only to assess its acceptability and feasibility but also to focus on knowledge transfer. Knowledge transfer is a dynamic and iterative process, involving the synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of knowledge in an ethically sound manner. This process supports the improvement of health outcomes, strengthens healthcare systems, and ensures that healthcare interventions, such as STI PrEP, are effectively understood and implemented by both healthcare providers and at-risk populations. Similarly, the perspectives of populations beyond GBMSM have been omitted, and there is little understanding of the impact of their differing socio-cultural contexts around sex-related behaviour and Western pharmaceutical healthcare interventions on their acceptance and uptake.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Further research into acceptability, feasibility and knowledge transfer among diverse high-risk groups, healthcare professionals, and policymakers is necessary to create a strong foundation for implementing STI PrEP.
format Article
id doaj-art-6bc2313b448f46cda8e91a6a9b338040
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-6bc2313b448f46cda8e91a6a9b3380402025-02-12T05:31:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e031766910.1371/journal.pone.0317669Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.Julie-Anne CarrollAmy B MullensSarah WarzywodaPhilip R A BakerMeika StaffordFaye McMillanJacintha MantonDaniel Demant<h4>Background</h4>A recent resurgence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is placing a major burden on high-risk populations, physicians, and the healthcare system. Treatment in the form of antibiotic pre-exposure prophylaxis (STI PrEP) is a potential solution. However, little is known about the acceptability and feasibility of this approach in high-risk populations.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed in October 2024 across six databases adhering to PRISMA guidelines.<h4>Results</h4>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were all conducted in high-income countries, used various methods, and all focussed on sexual minority men. Findings consistently identified moderate to high levels of acceptability among GBMSM (54.3% - 67.5%). Factors such as engagement in perceived 'high risk' sexual encounters, and past diagnosis of STIs strengthened acceptability, while others (e.g., antimicrobial resistance concerns and stigma) act as barriers. Only one study included the perspectives of healthcare workers, indicating a moderate willingness to prescribe, which would increase under governing-body endorsement.<h4>Discussion</h4>Overall, while there is some promise of STI PrEP acceptability among GBMSM, vast gaps in knowledge remain. Knowledge transfer and feasibility and, hence, the sustainability and capacity needed for the success of STI PrEP is yet to be examined and understood. However, for STI PrEP to be successfully adopted, it is essential not only to assess its acceptability and feasibility but also to focus on knowledge transfer. Knowledge transfer is a dynamic and iterative process, involving the synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of knowledge in an ethically sound manner. This process supports the improvement of health outcomes, strengthens healthcare systems, and ensures that healthcare interventions, such as STI PrEP, are effectively understood and implemented by both healthcare providers and at-risk populations. Similarly, the perspectives of populations beyond GBMSM have been omitted, and there is little understanding of the impact of their differing socio-cultural contexts around sex-related behaviour and Western pharmaceutical healthcare interventions on their acceptance and uptake.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Further research into acceptability, feasibility and knowledge transfer among diverse high-risk groups, healthcare professionals, and policymakers is necessary to create a strong foundation for implementing STI PrEP.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317669
spellingShingle Julie-Anne Carroll
Amy B Mullens
Sarah Warzywoda
Philip R A Baker
Meika Stafford
Faye McMillan
Jacintha Manton
Daniel Demant
Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.
PLoS ONE
title Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.
title_full Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.
title_fullStr Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.
title_short Acceptability and feasibility of pre-exposure prophylaxis for bacterial STIs: a systematic review.
title_sort acceptability and feasibility of pre exposure prophylaxis for bacterial stis a systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317669
work_keys_str_mv AT julieannecarroll acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT amybmullens acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT sarahwarzywoda acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT philiprabaker acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT meikastafford acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT fayemcmillan acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT jacinthamanton acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview
AT danieldemant acceptabilityandfeasibilityofpreexposureprophylaxisforbacterialstisasystematicreview