A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area

Objectives: Intraoral scanners used for the fabrication of milled and 3D-printed complete dentures simplify the procedure. However, its effectiveness in recording the functional peripheral seal area needs to be researched. Therefore, this study aims to assess the retention of conventional, milled an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh, Vaishnavi M. Nayak, Kavishma Sulaya, Smitha Sammith Shetty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001714
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823864405483323392
author Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh
Vaishnavi M. Nayak
Kavishma Sulaya
Smitha Sammith Shetty
author_facet Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh
Vaishnavi M. Nayak
Kavishma Sulaya
Smitha Sammith Shetty
author_sort Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Intraoral scanners used for the fabrication of milled and 3D-printed complete dentures simplify the procedure. However, its effectiveness in recording the functional peripheral seal area needs to be researched. Therefore, this study aims to assess the retention of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture bases made from conventional impression technique and digital scans in different types of post palatal seal area. Material and method: Completely edentulous participants were divided into group A and group B based on type of posterior palatal seal area. Each group received three denture bases fabricated using compression molding, milling and 3D printing. The retention was evaluated using a digital dynamometer at 45° and 90° inclination. Results: The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant difference in the retention of denture bases fabricated using three different techniques. When compared between the three groups at 45 and 90°, statistically significant difference in the retentive values between the control and other two groups were observed. Conclusion: All three of the fabrication processes have retention that falls within a clinically acceptable range. 3D printed dentures had better adaptation on the PPS area whereas the milled dentures had a better peripheral seal although the conventional process showed highest retention values.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ced004399c246588ec2e1eed259a649
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-6ced004399c246588ec2e1eed259a6492025-02-09T05:00:08ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682025-01-011511115A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal areaSwapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh0Vaishnavi M. Nayak1Kavishma Sulaya2Smitha Sammith Shetty3Department of Prosthodontics and Crown& Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown& Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown& Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India; Corresponding author.Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, IndiaObjectives: Intraoral scanners used for the fabrication of milled and 3D-printed complete dentures simplify the procedure. However, its effectiveness in recording the functional peripheral seal area needs to be researched. Therefore, this study aims to assess the retention of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture bases made from conventional impression technique and digital scans in different types of post palatal seal area. Material and method: Completely edentulous participants were divided into group A and group B based on type of posterior palatal seal area. Each group received three denture bases fabricated using compression molding, milling and 3D printing. The retention was evaluated using a digital dynamometer at 45° and 90° inclination. Results: The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant difference in the retention of denture bases fabricated using three different techniques. When compared between the three groups at 45 and 90°, statistically significant difference in the retentive values between the control and other two groups were observed. Conclusion: All three of the fabrication processes have retention that falls within a clinically acceptable range. 3D printed dentures had better adaptation on the PPS area whereas the milled dentures had a better peripheral seal although the conventional process showed highest retention values.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001714Computer-aided designDenture basesDenture retentionPrinting three- dimensionalDigital technologyMilling
spellingShingle Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh
Vaishnavi M. Nayak
Kavishma Sulaya
Smitha Sammith Shetty
A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Computer-aided design
Denture bases
Denture retention
Printing three- dimensional
Digital technology
Milling
title A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
title_full A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
title_short A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
title_sort comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
topic Computer-aided design
Denture bases
Denture retention
Printing three- dimensional
Digital technology
Milling
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001714
work_keys_str_mv AT swapnabettanapalyavenkatesh acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT vaishnavimnayak acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT kavishmasulaya acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT smithasammithshetty acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT swapnabettanapalyavenkatesh comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT vaishnavimnayak comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT kavishmasulaya comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea
AT smithasammithshetty comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea