A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area
Objectives: Intraoral scanners used for the fabrication of milled and 3D-printed complete dentures simplify the procedure. However, its effectiveness in recording the functional peripheral seal area needs to be researched. Therefore, this study aims to assess the retention of conventional, milled an...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001714 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823864405483323392 |
---|---|
author | Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh Vaishnavi M. Nayak Kavishma Sulaya Smitha Sammith Shetty |
author_facet | Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh Vaishnavi M. Nayak Kavishma Sulaya Smitha Sammith Shetty |
author_sort | Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives: Intraoral scanners used for the fabrication of milled and 3D-printed complete dentures simplify the procedure. However, its effectiveness in recording the functional peripheral seal area needs to be researched. Therefore, this study aims to assess the retention of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture bases made from conventional impression technique and digital scans in different types of post palatal seal area. Material and method: Completely edentulous participants were divided into group A and group B based on type of posterior palatal seal area. Each group received three denture bases fabricated using compression molding, milling and 3D printing. The retention was evaluated using a digital dynamometer at 45° and 90° inclination. Results: The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant difference in the retention of denture bases fabricated using three different techniques. When compared between the three groups at 45 and 90°, statistically significant difference in the retentive values between the control and other two groups were observed. Conclusion: All three of the fabrication processes have retention that falls within a clinically acceptable range. 3D printed dentures had better adaptation on the PPS area whereas the milled dentures had a better peripheral seal although the conventional process showed highest retention values. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-6ced004399c246588ec2e1eed259a649 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2212-4268 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research |
spelling | doaj-art-6ced004399c246588ec2e1eed259a6492025-02-09T05:00:08ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682025-01-011511115A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal areaSwapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh0Vaishnavi M. Nayak1Kavishma Sulaya2Smitha Sammith Shetty3Department of Prosthodontics and Crown& Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown& Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown& Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India; Corresponding author.Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, IndiaObjectives: Intraoral scanners used for the fabrication of milled and 3D-printed complete dentures simplify the procedure. However, its effectiveness in recording the functional peripheral seal area needs to be researched. Therefore, this study aims to assess the retention of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture bases made from conventional impression technique and digital scans in different types of post palatal seal area. Material and method: Completely edentulous participants were divided into group A and group B based on type of posterior palatal seal area. Each group received three denture bases fabricated using compression molding, milling and 3D printing. The retention was evaluated using a digital dynamometer at 45° and 90° inclination. Results: The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant difference in the retention of denture bases fabricated using three different techniques. When compared between the three groups at 45 and 90°, statistically significant difference in the retentive values between the control and other two groups were observed. Conclusion: All three of the fabrication processes have retention that falls within a clinically acceptable range. 3D printed dentures had better adaptation on the PPS area whereas the milled dentures had a better peripheral seal although the conventional process showed highest retention values.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001714Computer-aided designDenture basesDenture retentionPrinting three- dimensionalDigital technologyMilling |
spellingShingle | Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh Vaishnavi M. Nayak Kavishma Sulaya Smitha Sammith Shetty A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research Computer-aided design Denture bases Denture retention Printing three- dimensional Digital technology Milling |
title | A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area |
title_full | A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area |
title_short | A comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of retention of record bases fabricated digitally in various types of posterior palatal seal area |
topic | Computer-aided design Denture bases Denture retention Printing three- dimensional Digital technology Milling |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swapnabettanapalyavenkatesh acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT vaishnavimnayak acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT kavishmasulaya acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT smithasammithshetty acomparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT swapnabettanapalyavenkatesh comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT vaishnavimnayak comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT kavishmasulaya comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea AT smithasammithshetty comparativeevaluationofretentionofrecordbasesfabricateddigitallyinvarioustypesofposteriorpalatalsealarea |