Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels

The assumption that history posits itself as a fact, while literature is to be taken as an artistic form, only for entertainment (i.e., the difference between truth and falsehood, reality and illusion) has long been debated by formalists and soclologlsts of literature. In Yoruba society, literature...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lere Adeyemi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LibraryPress@UF 2021-12-01
Series:Yoruba Studies Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.test.flvc.org/ysr/article/view/130019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206010154844160
author Lere Adeyemi
author_facet Lere Adeyemi
author_sort Lere Adeyemi
collection DOAJ
description The assumption that history posits itself as a fact, while literature is to be taken as an artistic form, only for entertainment (i.e., the difference between truth and falsehood, reality and illusion) has long been debated by formalists and soclologlsts of literature. In Yoruba society, literature and history are im­portant in explaining the fullness of life and the world around us. It is against this background that this paper examines the relationship between literature and history and how Yoruba novelists use their works as vehicles for the repre­sentation of history. We adopt the theory of New Historicism to analyze T.A.A. Ladele's lgbi Aye n yi and Olu Owolabi's Ote Nibo. Some of the findings reveal that: both Yoruba literature and history are closely related, they are both based on Yoruba experience and Yoruba existence either in the past or present; while Ladele Interprets the history of the dignity and royal glamour of the Yoruba oba in the precolonial era as a form of domination which is often achieved through culturally-orchestrated consent rather than force; Owolabi represents the hlstory of party politics in Yoruba society as fraudulent, deceltful, full of bitterness and violence. The paper concludes that both novelists are subjective in their representation of Yoruba history, but they successfully establfsh the fact that the novel is a repository of history; however, such history is not a mere chronlcle of facts and events, but rather a complex description of human reality and a challenge to the preconceived notions of the societies from which they emerged.
format Article
id doaj-art-747dd137e88b4623af96b8c308a1ac0e
institution Kabale University
issn 2473-4713
2578-692X
language English
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher LibraryPress@UF
record_format Article
series Yoruba Studies Review
spelling doaj-art-747dd137e88b4623af96b8c308a1ac0e2025-02-07T13:45:27ZengLibraryPress@UFYoruba Studies Review2473-47132578-692X2021-12-0111Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical NovelsLere Adeyemi0University of llorin The assumption that history posits itself as a fact, while literature is to be taken as an artistic form, only for entertainment (i.e., the difference between truth and falsehood, reality and illusion) has long been debated by formalists and soclologlsts of literature. In Yoruba society, literature and history are im­portant in explaining the fullness of life and the world around us. It is against this background that this paper examines the relationship between literature and history and how Yoruba novelists use their works as vehicles for the repre­sentation of history. We adopt the theory of New Historicism to analyze T.A.A. Ladele's lgbi Aye n yi and Olu Owolabi's Ote Nibo. Some of the findings reveal that: both Yoruba literature and history are closely related, they are both based on Yoruba experience and Yoruba existence either in the past or present; while Ladele Interprets the history of the dignity and royal glamour of the Yoruba oba in the precolonial era as a form of domination which is often achieved through culturally-orchestrated consent rather than force; Owolabi represents the hlstory of party politics in Yoruba society as fraudulent, deceltful, full of bitterness and violence. The paper concludes that both novelists are subjective in their representation of Yoruba history, but they successfully establfsh the fact that the novel is a repository of history; however, such history is not a mere chronlcle of facts and events, but rather a complex description of human reality and a challenge to the preconceived notions of the societies from which they emerged. https://ojs.test.flvc.org/ysr/article/view/130019New Historicismliteraturehistorypolitical powerhistorical novels
spellingShingle Lere Adeyemi
Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels
Yoruba Studies Review
New Historicism
literature
history
political power
historical novels
title Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels
title_full Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels
title_fullStr Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels
title_full_unstemmed Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels
title_short Literature and History: Study of Nigerian Indigenous Historical Novels
title_sort literature and history study of nigerian indigenous historical novels
topic New Historicism
literature
history
political power
historical novels
url https://ojs.test.flvc.org/ysr/article/view/130019
work_keys_str_mv AT lereadeyemi literatureandhistorystudyofnigerianindigenoushistoricalnovels