Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
Abstract This study mainly involved conducting an atmospheric sensitivity analysis of the dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ, respectively. The results for Fuzhou and Xiamen cities showed that the total PCDD/F mass concentration was the factor most positively correla...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823862898152177664 |
---|---|
author | Fanxuan Yu Kangping Cui Hwey-Lin Sheu Yen-Kung Hsieh Xueying Tian |
author_facet | Fanxuan Yu Kangping Cui Hwey-Lin Sheu Yen-Kung Hsieh Xueying Tian |
author_sort | Fanxuan Yu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract This study mainly involved conducting an atmospheric sensitivity analysis of the dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ, respectively. The results for Fuzhou and Xiamen cities showed that the total PCDD/F mass concentration was the factor most positively correlated to the dry deposition flux: When ΔP/P ranged from –50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −66.0% to 0%, but when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to +66.0%, respectively. The second factor positively correlated with the deposition flux was the PM2.5 concentration: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −63.3% to 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50% and +100%, ΔS/S ranged from 0% to +20.8 and −0.9%, respectively. Ambient air temperature was found to be less sensitive to dry deposition fluxes in total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to −17% and 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −17.0% to +5.6% and 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to −84.5%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis for PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content had similar results to those for dry deposition flux. In addition, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, the annual average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content at Fuzhou and Xiamen was 0.430, 0.127, 0.303, and 0.426 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1 in the spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, which showed that summer had the lowest content, while spring and winter had the highest. The results of this study provided useful information for gaining a deeper understanding of both dry deposition and particle-bound of PCDD/Fs in the ambient air. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-752284b6197e472bacf9521acfd6fb2b |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1680-8584 2071-1409 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | Article |
series | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
spelling | doaj-art-752284b6197e472bacf9521acfd6fb2b2025-02-09T12:20:22ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092021-06-0121712010.4209/aaqr.210118Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient AirFanxuan Yu0Kangping Cui1Hwey-Lin Sheu2Yen-Kung Hsieh3Xueying Tian4School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologySchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologyDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kun Shan UniversityMarine Ecology and Conservation Research Center, National Academy of Marine ResearchSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologyAbstract This study mainly involved conducting an atmospheric sensitivity analysis of the dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ, respectively. The results for Fuzhou and Xiamen cities showed that the total PCDD/F mass concentration was the factor most positively correlated to the dry deposition flux: When ΔP/P ranged from –50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −66.0% to 0%, but when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to +66.0%, respectively. The second factor positively correlated with the deposition flux was the PM2.5 concentration: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −63.3% to 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50% and +100%, ΔS/S ranged from 0% to +20.8 and −0.9%, respectively. Ambient air temperature was found to be less sensitive to dry deposition fluxes in total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to −17% and 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −17.0% to +5.6% and 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to −84.5%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis for PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content had similar results to those for dry deposition flux. In addition, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, the annual average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content at Fuzhou and Xiamen was 0.430, 0.127, 0.303, and 0.426 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1 in the spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, which showed that summer had the lowest content, while spring and winter had the highest. The results of this study provided useful information for gaining a deeper understanding of both dry deposition and particle-bound of PCDD/Fs in the ambient air.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118Sensitivity analysisDry depositionPCDD/FsTEQPM2.5COVID-19 |
spellingShingle | Fanxuan Yu Kangping Cui Hwey-Lin Sheu Yen-Kung Hsieh Xueying Tian Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air Aerosol and Air Quality Research Sensitivity analysis Dry deposition PCDD/Fs TEQ PM2.5 COVID-19 |
title | Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air |
title_full | Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air |
title_short | Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air |
title_sort | sensitivity analysis for dry deposition and pm2 5 bound content of pcdd fs in the ambient air |
topic | Sensitivity analysis Dry deposition PCDD/Fs TEQ PM2.5 COVID-19 |
url | https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanxuanyu sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair AT kangpingcui sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair AT hweylinsheu sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair AT yenkunghsieh sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair AT xueyingtian sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair |