Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air

Abstract This study mainly involved conducting an atmospheric sensitivity analysis of the dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ, respectively. The results for Fuzhou and Xiamen cities showed that the total PCDD/F mass concentration was the factor most positively correla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fanxuan Yu, Kangping Cui, Hwey-Lin Sheu, Yen-Kung Hsieh, Xueying Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021-06-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862898152177664
author Fanxuan Yu
Kangping Cui
Hwey-Lin Sheu
Yen-Kung Hsieh
Xueying Tian
author_facet Fanxuan Yu
Kangping Cui
Hwey-Lin Sheu
Yen-Kung Hsieh
Xueying Tian
author_sort Fanxuan Yu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study mainly involved conducting an atmospheric sensitivity analysis of the dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ, respectively. The results for Fuzhou and Xiamen cities showed that the total PCDD/F mass concentration was the factor most positively correlated to the dry deposition flux: When ΔP/P ranged from –50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −66.0% to 0%, but when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to +66.0%, respectively. The second factor positively correlated with the deposition flux was the PM2.5 concentration: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −63.3% to 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50% and +100%, ΔS/S ranged from 0% to +20.8 and −0.9%, respectively. Ambient air temperature was found to be less sensitive to dry deposition fluxes in total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to −17% and 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −17.0% to +5.6% and 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to −84.5%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis for PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content had similar results to those for dry deposition flux. In addition, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, the annual average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content at Fuzhou and Xiamen was 0.430, 0.127, 0.303, and 0.426 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1 in the spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, which showed that summer had the lowest content, while spring and winter had the highest. The results of this study provided useful information for gaining a deeper understanding of both dry deposition and particle-bound of PCDD/Fs in the ambient air.
format Article
id doaj-art-752284b6197e472bacf9521acfd6fb2b
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-752284b6197e472bacf9521acfd6fb2b2025-02-09T12:20:22ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092021-06-0121712010.4209/aaqr.210118Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient AirFanxuan Yu0Kangping Cui1Hwey-Lin Sheu2Yen-Kung Hsieh3Xueying Tian4School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologySchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologyDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kun Shan UniversityMarine Ecology and Conservation Research Center, National Academy of Marine ResearchSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of TechnologyAbstract This study mainly involved conducting an atmospheric sensitivity analysis of the dry deposition and PM2.5-bound content of total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ, respectively. The results for Fuzhou and Xiamen cities showed that the total PCDD/F mass concentration was the factor most positively correlated to the dry deposition flux: When ΔP/P ranged from –50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −66.0% to 0%, but when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to +66.0%, respectively. The second factor positively correlated with the deposition flux was the PM2.5 concentration: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −63.3% to 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50% and +100%, ΔS/S ranged from 0% to +20.8 and −0.9%, respectively. Ambient air temperature was found to be less sensitive to dry deposition fluxes in total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ: When ΔP/P ranged from −50% to −17% and 0%, ΔS/S ranged from −17.0% to +5.6% and 0%; when ΔP/P increased from 0% to +50%, ΔS/S increased from 0% to −84.5%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis for PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content had similar results to those for dry deposition flux. In addition, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, the annual average PM2.5-bound total PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ content at Fuzhou and Xiamen was 0.430, 0.127, 0.303, and 0.426 ng-WHO2005-TEQ g−1 in the spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, which showed that summer had the lowest content, while spring and winter had the highest. The results of this study provided useful information for gaining a deeper understanding of both dry deposition and particle-bound of PCDD/Fs in the ambient air.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118Sensitivity analysisDry depositionPCDD/FsTEQPM2.5COVID-19
spellingShingle Fanxuan Yu
Kangping Cui
Hwey-Lin Sheu
Yen-Kung Hsieh
Xueying Tian
Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Sensitivity analysis
Dry deposition
PCDD/Fs
TEQ
PM2.5
COVID-19
title Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
title_full Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
title_fullStr Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
title_short Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Deposition and PM2.5-bound Content of PCDD/Fs in the Ambient Air
title_sort sensitivity analysis for dry deposition and pm2 5 bound content of pcdd fs in the ambient air
topic Sensitivity analysis
Dry deposition
PCDD/Fs
TEQ
PM2.5
COVID-19
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210118
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxuanyu sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair
AT kangpingcui sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair
AT hweylinsheu sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair
AT yenkunghsieh sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair
AT xueyingtian sensitivityanalysisfordrydepositionandpm25boundcontentofpcddfsintheambientair