Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis

**Background:** Agents targeting the prostacyclin (PGI~2~) pathway are important in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). No head-to-head clinical trials have compared outcomes between the 3 different PGI~2~-pathway drugs most commonly available in countries with advanced healthcare: oral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ci Song, Peter Kunovszki, Amélie Beaudet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.35246
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860351448383488
author Ci Song
Peter Kunovszki
Amélie Beaudet
author_facet Ci Song
Peter Kunovszki
Amélie Beaudet
author_sort Ci Song
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Agents targeting the prostacyclin (PGI~2~) pathway are important in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). No head-to-head clinical trials have compared outcomes between the 3 different PGI~2~-pathway drugs most commonly available in countries with advanced healthcare: oral selexipag, inhaled iloprost, and parenteral (subcutaneous or intravenous) treprostinil. **Objectives:** To conduct retrospective database analyses to describe characteristics of patients with PAH initiating therapy with these agents and compare the rate and risk of healthcare facility encounters and drug persistence. **Methods:** Data were obtained from the Optum™ Clinformatics® Data Mart and Truven™ Health Analytics® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters databases from July 1, 2008, to September 30, 2020 (Optum™), or October 31, 2020 (Truven™). Patients were categorized into index-drug cohorts based on first pharmacy claims for selexipag, inhaled iloprost, or parenteral treprostinil. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with ≥1 ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM diagnosis code indicating pulmonary hypertension and no diagnosis code suggesting Group 3–5 pulmonary hypertension. Rates of hospitalization (inpatient admissions), emergency room visits, or outpatient visits per person-year were calculated. Drug persistence was measured as time to discontinuation of index drug. Multivariable analyses were performed to compare outcomes with selexipag vs inhaled iloprost and parenteral treprostinil, adjusting for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. **Results:** Overall, 583 patients were included in the Optum™ sample and 482 in the Truven™ sample. Mean (SD) age was 61.7 (14.5) and 49.3 (11.3) years, respectively; 74.4% and 75.7% of patients, respectively, were women. In the pooled samples, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, selexipag had a lower risk than inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil for hospitalization (relative rate ratio [95% CI], 0.40 [0.22, 0.75], and 0.26 [0.17, 0.39]) and outpatient visits (0.66 [0.56, 0.78] and 0.76 [0.66, 0.88]). Trends toward lower risk of emergency room visits did not attain statistical significance. Drug discontinuation risk was 16% and 36% lower with selexipag vs parenteral treprostinil and inhaled iloprost, respectively. **Conclusions:** In real-world use, selexipag appears to be associated with lower rates of hospitalization and outpatient visits than inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil. Further research is required to identify factors underlying these differences.
format Article
id doaj-art-7bd61fe914c841b09b0e386d5e51e74f
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-7bd61fe914c841b09b0e386d5e51e74f2025-02-10T16:13:04ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362022-06-0191Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database AnalysisCi SongPeter KunovszkiAmélie Beaudet**Background:** Agents targeting the prostacyclin (PGI~2~) pathway are important in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). No head-to-head clinical trials have compared outcomes between the 3 different PGI~2~-pathway drugs most commonly available in countries with advanced healthcare: oral selexipag, inhaled iloprost, and parenteral (subcutaneous or intravenous) treprostinil. **Objectives:** To conduct retrospective database analyses to describe characteristics of patients with PAH initiating therapy with these agents and compare the rate and risk of healthcare facility encounters and drug persistence. **Methods:** Data were obtained from the Optum™ Clinformatics® Data Mart and Truven™ Health Analytics® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters databases from July 1, 2008, to September 30, 2020 (Optum™), or October 31, 2020 (Truven™). Patients were categorized into index-drug cohorts based on first pharmacy claims for selexipag, inhaled iloprost, or parenteral treprostinil. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with ≥1 ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM diagnosis code indicating pulmonary hypertension and no diagnosis code suggesting Group 3–5 pulmonary hypertension. Rates of hospitalization (inpatient admissions), emergency room visits, or outpatient visits per person-year were calculated. Drug persistence was measured as time to discontinuation of index drug. Multivariable analyses were performed to compare outcomes with selexipag vs inhaled iloprost and parenteral treprostinil, adjusting for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. **Results:** Overall, 583 patients were included in the Optum™ sample and 482 in the Truven™ sample. Mean (SD) age was 61.7 (14.5) and 49.3 (11.3) years, respectively; 74.4% and 75.7% of patients, respectively, were women. In the pooled samples, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, selexipag had a lower risk than inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil for hospitalization (relative rate ratio [95% CI], 0.40 [0.22, 0.75], and 0.26 [0.17, 0.39]) and outpatient visits (0.66 [0.56, 0.78] and 0.76 [0.66, 0.88]). Trends toward lower risk of emergency room visits did not attain statistical significance. Drug discontinuation risk was 16% and 36% lower with selexipag vs parenteral treprostinil and inhaled iloprost, respectively. **Conclusions:** In real-world use, selexipag appears to be associated with lower rates of hospitalization and outpatient visits than inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil. Further research is required to identify factors underlying these differences.https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.35246
spellingShingle Ci Song
Peter Kunovszki
Amélie Beaudet
Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis
title_full Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis
title_short Comparison of Healthcare Encounters and Drug Persistence in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Oral Selexipag, Inhaled Iloprost, or Parenteral Treprostinil: A Retrospective Database Analysis
title_sort comparison of healthcare encounters and drug persistence in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension receiving oral selexipag inhaled iloprost or parenteral treprostinil a retrospective database analysis
url https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.35246
work_keys_str_mv AT cisong comparisonofhealthcareencountersanddrugpersistenceinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionreceivingoralselexipaginhalediloprostorparenteraltreprostinilaretrospectivedatabaseanalysis
AT peterkunovszki comparisonofhealthcareencountersanddrugpersistenceinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionreceivingoralselexipaginhalediloprostorparenteraltreprostinilaretrospectivedatabaseanalysis
AT ameliebeaudet comparisonofhealthcareencountersanddrugpersistenceinpatientswithpulmonaryarterialhypertensionreceivingoralselexipaginhalediloprostorparenteraltreprostinilaretrospectivedatabaseanalysis