Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights

This paper examines whether or not children’s continued electoral exclusion is morally defensible. Ultimately, there is a deep tension between the egalitarian presuppositions of democracy and our apparent unwillingness to grant children voting rights. Unless a plausible distinction can be found, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Lecce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tübingen University 2009-11-01
Series:Intergenerational Justice Review
Online Access:https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/510
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861111671226368
author Steven Lecce
author_facet Steven Lecce
author_sort Steven Lecce
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines whether or not children’s continued electoral exclusion is morally defensible. Ultimately, there is a deep tension between the egalitarian presuppositions of democracy and our apparent unwillingness to grant children voting rights. Unless a plausible distinction can be found, then, between adults and children that also tracks the underlying reasons for endorsing democracy in the first place, the continued political disenfranchisement of our youngest citizens is shown for what it is: social injustice. e paper begins by exploring some of the conceptual difficulties that childhood creates in relation to democracy. It then assesses the implications of two very different approaches to democracy for children’s voting rights: proceduralism and a child’s supposed right to an open future.
format Article
id doaj-art-7eb5929c0c5e424e845808bcf1cb6edd
institution Kabale University
issn 2190-6335
language English
publishDate 2009-11-01
publisher Tübingen University
record_format Article
series Intergenerational Justice Review
spelling doaj-art-7eb5929c0c5e424e845808bcf1cb6edd2025-02-10T05:00:42ZengTübingen UniversityIntergenerational Justice Review2190-63352009-11-014Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting RightsSteven Lecce0University of ManitobaThis paper examines whether or not children’s continued electoral exclusion is morally defensible. Ultimately, there is a deep tension between the egalitarian presuppositions of democracy and our apparent unwillingness to grant children voting rights. Unless a plausible distinction can be found, then, between adults and children that also tracks the underlying reasons for endorsing democracy in the first place, the continued political disenfranchisement of our youngest citizens is shown for what it is: social injustice. e paper begins by exploring some of the conceptual difficulties that childhood creates in relation to democracy. It then assesses the implications of two very different approaches to democracy for children’s voting rights: proceduralism and a child’s supposed right to an open future.https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/510
spellingShingle Steven Lecce
Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights
Intergenerational Justice Review
title Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights
title_full Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights
title_fullStr Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights
title_full_unstemmed Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights
title_short Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights
title_sort should democracy grow up children and voting rights
url https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/510
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenlecce shoulddemocracygrowupchildrenandvotingrights