Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.

Background: porcelain layered zirconia restoration fractures are serious and create an aesthetic and functional dilemma for the patients and the dentist. This demands the development of practical repair options that do not necessitate removing and remaking entire restorations. The roughness of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Jawad Challo, Shatha Abdulla Salih
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University 2023-06-01
Series:Erbil Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/214
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859771518746624
author Maryam Jawad Challo
Shatha Abdulla Salih
author_facet Maryam Jawad Challo
Shatha Abdulla Salih
author_sort Maryam Jawad Challo
collection DOAJ
description Background: porcelain layered zirconia restoration fractures are serious and create an aesthetic and functional dilemma for the patients and the dentist. This demands the development of practical repair options that do not necessitate removing and remaking entire restorations. The roughness of the porcelain surface before repairing material application is considered a critical step. Objectives: investigated the effect of sandblasting, fractional co2 laser, and hydrofluoric acid as a surface treatment on the roughness of porcelain layered zirconia restorations Method: forty-two zirconia blocks prepared by CAD/CAM technology in dimensions of (10 mm width × 10 mm length×3 mm thickness). Divided into three study groups according to corresponding methods of surface treatment: sandblasting group PS (N=14), fractional CO2 laser group PCO2(N=14), and hydrofluoric acid group PHF (N=14). all the specimens were subjected to surface roughness measurements using a profilometer. Result: There was a greater surface roughness for the laser group (6.24 um) than for sandblasting surface treatments (2.59 um) and hydrofluoric acid, which shows a similar result with no statistically significant difference from sandblasting (2,14 um). Conclusion: all surface treatments create roughness on the porcelain surface, and no significant differences were observed between sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid. Better results were observed in the CO2 laser group.
format Article
id doaj-art-805b13b373b940c4b25269202c90e77b
institution Kabale University
issn 2523-6172
2616-4795
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher College Of Dentistry Hawler Medical University
record_format Article
series Erbil Dental Journal
spelling doaj-art-805b13b373b940c4b25269202c90e77b2025-02-10T20:48:13ZengCollege Of Dentistry Hawler Medical UniversityErbil Dental Journal2523-61722616-47952023-06-0161Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.Maryam Jawad Challo0Shatha Abdulla Salih1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq. Background: porcelain layered zirconia restoration fractures are serious and create an aesthetic and functional dilemma for the patients and the dentist. This demands the development of practical repair options that do not necessitate removing and remaking entire restorations. The roughness of the porcelain surface before repairing material application is considered a critical step. Objectives: investigated the effect of sandblasting, fractional co2 laser, and hydrofluoric acid as a surface treatment on the roughness of porcelain layered zirconia restorations Method: forty-two zirconia blocks prepared by CAD/CAM technology in dimensions of (10 mm width × 10 mm length×3 mm thickness). Divided into three study groups according to corresponding methods of surface treatment: sandblasting group PS (N=14), fractional CO2 laser group PCO2(N=14), and hydrofluoric acid group PHF (N=14). all the specimens were subjected to surface roughness measurements using a profilometer. Result: There was a greater surface roughness for the laser group (6.24 um) than for sandblasting surface treatments (2.59 um) and hydrofluoric acid, which shows a similar result with no statistically significant difference from sandblasting (2,14 um). Conclusion: all surface treatments create roughness on the porcelain surface, and no significant differences were observed between sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid. Better results were observed in the CO2 laser group. https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/214LaserPorcelain repairsurface treatmentsandblastingsurface roughnesshydrofluoric acid treatments
spellingShingle Maryam Jawad Challo
Shatha Abdulla Salih
Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.
Erbil Dental Journal
Laser
Porcelain repair
surface treatment
sandblasting
surface roughness
hydrofluoric acid treatments
title Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.
title_full Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.
title_fullStr Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.
title_short Effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration.
title_sort effect of different surface treatments on the roughness of porcelain layer for all ceramic restoration
topic Laser
Porcelain repair
surface treatment
sandblasting
surface roughness
hydrofluoric acid treatments
url https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/214
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamjawadchallo effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsontheroughnessofporcelainlayerforallceramicrestoration
AT shathaabdullasalih effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsontheroughnessofporcelainlayerforallceramicrestoration