Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols

Background: Recently POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) classification was proposed to categorize patients with expected poor response to conventional stimulation. Searching for the ideal management of poor responders in IVF is still an active research a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tarek K. Al-Hussaini, Ahmed Aboelfadle Mohamed, Ayman Askar, Ahmed A. Abden, Yousra M. Othman, Reda S. Hussein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_72_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860969037627392
author Tarek K. Al-Hussaini
Ahmed Aboelfadle Mohamed
Ayman Askar
Ahmed A. Abden
Yousra M. Othman
Reda S. Hussein
author_facet Tarek K. Al-Hussaini
Ahmed Aboelfadle Mohamed
Ayman Askar
Ahmed A. Abden
Yousra M. Othman
Reda S. Hussein
author_sort Tarek K. Al-Hussaini
collection DOAJ
description Background: Recently POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) classification was proposed to categorize patients with expected poor response to conventional stimulation. Searching for the ideal management of poor responders in IVF is still an active research area. Aims: This study compares GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist short protocols in ICSI cycles for the POSEIDON-4 group. Settings and Design: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary infertility unit between January 2016 and December 2020. Materials and Methods: Infertile women who met the criteria for POSEIDON 4 group and underwent fresh ICSI-ET in using GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist short protocols was performed. POSEIDON-4 includes patients ≥ 35 years with poor ovarian reserve markers; AFC < 5 and AMH < 1.2 ng/ml. Statistical Analysis Used: Numerical variables were compared between both groups by student’s t test and Mann Whitney test when appropriate. Chi-square test used to compare categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to adjust for the effect of the different study confounders on live birth rate. Results: One hundred ninety fresh ICSI cycles were analyzed. Of the total cohort, 41.6 % (79) patients pursued antagonist protocol compared to 58.4% (111) underwent short agonist protocol. Fresh embryo transfer was accomplished in 55.7 % (44/79) vs. 61.3 % (68/111), P = 0.44 in antagonist vs. short protocol respectively. Cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response was encountered in (32.9%vs. 27.9%, P = 0.50) in the antagonist and short groups, whereas no good-quality embryos were developed after ovum pickup in 11.4% vs. 10.8%, P>0.05. Comparable total gonadotropins dose, number of retrieved and mature oocytes, and good-quality embryos were found in both groups. Likewise, clinical pregnancy rate was not different for the antagonist and short groups [11/79 (13.9%) vs. 20/111 (18%), P = 0.45]. The live birth rate was comparable between both groups (8.9% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.659) for antagonist and short groups respectively. No significant impact for the protocol type on live birth rate was revealed after adjusting to cycle confounders in multivariate analysis (OR: 0.439, 95%CI 0.134-1.434, P = 0.173). Conclusion: This study shows comparable pregnancy outcomes for antagonist and short-agonist protocols in IVF/ICSI cycles for POSEIDON-4 category.
format Article
id doaj-art-81e3ba1a7d54464a8520ce0ec2edd351
institution Kabale University
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
spelling doaj-art-81e3ba1a7d54464a8520ce0ec2edd3512025-02-10T07:46:11ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662023-07-0116321221710.4103/jhrs.jhrs_72_23Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist ProtocolsTarek K. Al-HussainiAhmed Aboelfadle MohamedAyman AskarAhmed A. AbdenYousra M. OthmanReda S. HusseinBackground: Recently POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) classification was proposed to categorize patients with expected poor response to conventional stimulation. Searching for the ideal management of poor responders in IVF is still an active research area. Aims: This study compares GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist short protocols in ICSI cycles for the POSEIDON-4 group. Settings and Design: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary infertility unit between January 2016 and December 2020. Materials and Methods: Infertile women who met the criteria for POSEIDON 4 group and underwent fresh ICSI-ET in using GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist short protocols was performed. POSEIDON-4 includes patients ≥ 35 years with poor ovarian reserve markers; AFC < 5 and AMH < 1.2 ng/ml. Statistical Analysis Used: Numerical variables were compared between both groups by student’s t test and Mann Whitney test when appropriate. Chi-square test used to compare categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to adjust for the effect of the different study confounders on live birth rate. Results: One hundred ninety fresh ICSI cycles were analyzed. Of the total cohort, 41.6 % (79) patients pursued antagonist protocol compared to 58.4% (111) underwent short agonist protocol. Fresh embryo transfer was accomplished in 55.7 % (44/79) vs. 61.3 % (68/111), P = 0.44 in antagonist vs. short protocol respectively. Cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response was encountered in (32.9%vs. 27.9%, P = 0.50) in the antagonist and short groups, whereas no good-quality embryos were developed after ovum pickup in 11.4% vs. 10.8%, P>0.05. Comparable total gonadotropins dose, number of retrieved and mature oocytes, and good-quality embryos were found in both groups. Likewise, clinical pregnancy rate was not different for the antagonist and short groups [11/79 (13.9%) vs. 20/111 (18%), P = 0.45]. The live birth rate was comparable between both groups (8.9% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.659) for antagonist and short groups respectively. No significant impact for the protocol type on live birth rate was revealed after adjusting to cycle confounders in multivariate analysis (OR: 0.439, 95%CI 0.134-1.434, P = 0.173). Conclusion: This study shows comparable pregnancy outcomes for antagonist and short-agonist protocols in IVF/ICSI cycles for POSEIDON-4 category.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_72_23antagonist protocolpatient-oriented strategies encompassing individualised oocyte number-4short protocol
spellingShingle Tarek K. Al-Hussaini
Ahmed Aboelfadle Mohamed
Ayman Askar
Ahmed A. Abden
Yousra M. Othman
Reda S. Hussein
Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
antagonist protocol
patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualised oocyte number-4
short protocol
title Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols
title_full Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols
title_fullStr Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols
title_short Ovarian Stimulation in Patient-oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number-4 Category; Antagonist versus Short-agonist Protocols
title_sort ovarian stimulation in patient oriented strategies encompassing individualised oocyte number 4 category antagonist versus short agonist protocols
topic antagonist protocol
patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualised oocyte number-4
short protocol
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_72_23
work_keys_str_mv AT tarekkalhussaini ovarianstimulationinpatientorientedstrategiesencompassingindividualisedoocytenumber4categoryantagonistversusshortagonistprotocols
AT ahmedaboelfadlemohamed ovarianstimulationinpatientorientedstrategiesencompassingindividualisedoocytenumber4categoryantagonistversusshortagonistprotocols
AT aymanaskar ovarianstimulationinpatientorientedstrategiesencompassingindividualisedoocytenumber4categoryantagonistversusshortagonistprotocols
AT ahmedaabden ovarianstimulationinpatientorientedstrategiesencompassingindividualisedoocytenumber4categoryantagonistversusshortagonistprotocols
AT yousramothman ovarianstimulationinpatientorientedstrategiesencompassingindividualisedoocytenumber4categoryantagonistversusshortagonistprotocols
AT redashussein ovarianstimulationinpatientorientedstrategiesencompassingindividualisedoocytenumber4categoryantagonistversusshortagonistprotocols