An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa

Background. Monitoring quality indicators to improve breast cancer care is well established in high-income countries. This is the first evaluation of diagnostic and surgical quality indicators for initial benchmarking of breast cancer care in South Africa (SA). Objective. To measure the adher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Nietz, H Cubasch, I Buccimazza, S Čačala, B Phakathi, M Joffe, W C C Chen, S Norris, P Ruff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African Medical Association 2025-02-01
Series:South African Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/2292
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860582944604160
author S Nietz
H Cubasch
I Buccimazza
S Čačala
B Phakathi
M Joffe
W C C Chen
S Norris
P Ruff
author_facet S Nietz
H Cubasch
I Buccimazza
S Čačala
B Phakathi
M Joffe
W C C Chen
S Norris
P Ruff
author_sort S Nietz
collection DOAJ
description Background. Monitoring quality indicators to improve breast cancer care is well established in high-income countries. This is the first evaluation of diagnostic and surgical quality indicators for initial benchmarking of breast cancer care in South Africa (SA). Objective. To measure the adherence rates to quality indicators among women with breast cancer in SA. Methods. Ten quality indicators were evaluated for 3 545 breast cancer patients across four SA surgical breast units using a shared electronic patient record system. Data quality and adherence rates with differences between units were determined. The effect of HIV status on adherence was assessed by multivariate Poisson regression analyses. Results. Our electronic patient record reliably measured most quality indicators. Rates of positive margins (5.7%), overall axillary surgery (95.8%) and appropriate treatment sequencing in locally advanced breast cancer patients (98.4%) consistently reached minimum international standards. Rates of multidisciplinary team discussion (72.2%), radiotherapy (66.7%) and sentinel node biopsy (39.6%) showed wide cross-site variance. Histopathology reporting (62.0%), breast-conserving surgery (19.4%) and number of nodes excised with axillary dissection (47.3%) and sentinel node biopsy (82.7%) were consistently below minimum standards. Unit volumes were achieved consistently in Gauteng Province, but only for some years in KwaZulu-Natal Province; surgeon volumes were achieved across all units. HIV status did not affect adherence levels. Most quality indicators were well measurable, but data quality on reoperations and surgeon volumes was poor. Conclusion. We evaluated local quality indicators for an initial benchmark, and the most emergent gaps in care are the receipt of radiotherapy and underutilisation of sentinel node biopsy.
format Article
id doaj-art-84d639f906a34b3e91857f18c67034de
institution Kabale University
issn 0256-9574
2078-5135
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher South African Medical Association
record_format Article
series South African Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-84d639f906a34b3e91857f18c67034de2025-02-10T12:25:25ZengSouth African Medical AssociationSouth African Medical Journal0256-95742078-51352025-02-01115110.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i1.2292An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South AfricaS Nietz0H Cubasch1I Buccimazza2S Čačala3B Phakathi4M Joffe5W C C Chen6S Norris7P Ruff8Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartment of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South AfricaDepartment of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Division of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Division of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South AfricaStrengthening Oncology Services Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaStrengthening Oncology Services Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, UKStrengthening Oncology Services Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Background. Monitoring quality indicators to improve breast cancer care is well established in high-income countries. This is the first evaluation of diagnostic and surgical quality indicators for initial benchmarking of breast cancer care in South Africa (SA). Objective. To measure the adherence rates to quality indicators among women with breast cancer in SA. Methods. Ten quality indicators were evaluated for 3 545 breast cancer patients across four SA surgical breast units using a shared electronic patient record system. Data quality and adherence rates with differences between units were determined. The effect of HIV status on adherence was assessed by multivariate Poisson regression analyses. Results. Our electronic patient record reliably measured most quality indicators. Rates of positive margins (5.7%), overall axillary surgery (95.8%) and appropriate treatment sequencing in locally advanced breast cancer patients (98.4%) consistently reached minimum international standards. Rates of multidisciplinary team discussion (72.2%), radiotherapy (66.7%) and sentinel node biopsy (39.6%) showed wide cross-site variance. Histopathology reporting (62.0%), breast-conserving surgery (19.4%) and number of nodes excised with axillary dissection (47.3%) and sentinel node biopsy (82.7%) were consistently below minimum standards. Unit volumes were achieved consistently in Gauteng Province, but only for some years in KwaZulu-Natal Province; surgeon volumes were achieved across all units. HIV status did not affect adherence levels. Most quality indicators were well measurable, but data quality on reoperations and surgeon volumes was poor. Conclusion. We evaluated local quality indicators for an initial benchmark, and the most emergent gaps in care are the receipt of radiotherapy and underutilisation of sentinel node biopsy. https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/2292breast cancerQuality of Careelectronic medical recordLow- and middle-income countries
spellingShingle S Nietz
H Cubasch
I Buccimazza
S Čačala
B Phakathi
M Joffe
W C C Chen
S Norris
P Ruff
An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa
South African Medical Journal
breast cancer
Quality of Care
electronic medical record
Low- and middle-income countries
title An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa
title_full An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa
title_fullStr An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa
title_short An initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in South Africa
title_sort initial benchmark of the quality of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer in south africa
topic breast cancer
Quality of Care
electronic medical record
Low- and middle-income countries
url https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/2292
work_keys_str_mv AT snietz aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT hcubasch aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT ibuccimazza aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT scacala aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT bphakathi aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT mjoffe aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT wccchen aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT snorris aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT pruff aninitialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT snietz initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT hcubasch initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT ibuccimazza initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT scacala initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT bphakathi initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT mjoffe initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT wccchen initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT snorris initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica
AT pruff initialbenchmarkofthequalityofthediagnosisandsurgicaltreatmentofbreastcancerinsouthafrica