A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up

Introduction: Despite the challenges related to His bundle pacing (HBP), recent data suggest an improved success rate with experience. As a non-university, non-electrophysiology specialised centre in Singapore, we report our experiences in HBP using pacing system analyser alone. Methods: Data of 28...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swee Leng Kui, Colin Yeo, Lisa Teo, Ai Ling Him, Sherida Binte Syed Hamid, Kelvin Wong, Vern Hsen Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications 2023-06-01
Series:Singapore Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2022066
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861416260534272
author Swee Leng Kui
Colin Yeo
Lisa Teo
Ai Ling Him
Sherida Binte Syed Hamid
Kelvin Wong
Vern Hsen Tan
author_facet Swee Leng Kui
Colin Yeo
Lisa Teo
Ai Ling Him
Sherida Binte Syed Hamid
Kelvin Wong
Vern Hsen Tan
author_sort Swee Leng Kui
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Despite the challenges related to His bundle pacing (HBP), recent data suggest an improved success rate with experience. As a non-university, non-electrophysiology specialised centre in Singapore, we report our experiences in HBP using pacing system analyser alone. Methods: Data of 28 consecutive patients who underwent HBP from August 2018 to February 2019 was retrospectively obtained. The clinical and technical outcomes of these patients were compared between two timeframes of three months each. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: Immediate technical success was achieved in 21 (75.0%) patients (mean age 73.3 ± 10.7 years, 47.6% female). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 53.9% ± 12.1%. The indications for HBP were atrioventricular block (n = 13, 61.9%), sinus node dysfunction (n = 7, 33.3%) and upgrade from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to His-cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n = 1, 4.8%). No significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between Timeframe 1 and Timeframe 2. Improvements pertaining to mean fluoroscopy time were achieved between the two timeframes. There was one HBP-related complication of lead displacement during Timeframe 1. All patients with successful HBP achieved non-selective His bundle (NSHB) capture, whereas only eight patients had selective His bundle (SHB) capture. NSHB and SHB capture thresholds remained stable at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: Permanent HBP is feasible and safe, even without the use of an electrophysiology recording system. This was successfully achieved in 75% of patients, with no adverse clinical outcomes during the follow-up period.
format Article
id doaj-art-86f6769e5af34d8b998fc2c52a82ff10
institution Kabale University
issn 0037-5675
2737-5935
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer – Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Singapore Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-86f6769e5af34d8b998fc2c52a82ff102025-02-09T13:49:23ZengWolters Kluwer – Medknow PublicationsSingapore Medical Journal0037-56752737-59352023-06-0164637337810.11622/smedj.2022066A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow upSwee Leng KuiColin YeoLisa TeoAi Ling HimSherida Binte Syed HamidKelvin WongVern Hsen TanIntroduction: Despite the challenges related to His bundle pacing (HBP), recent data suggest an improved success rate with experience. As a non-university, non-electrophysiology specialised centre in Singapore, we report our experiences in HBP using pacing system analyser alone. Methods: Data of 28 consecutive patients who underwent HBP from August 2018 to February 2019 was retrospectively obtained. The clinical and technical outcomes of these patients were compared between two timeframes of three months each. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: Immediate technical success was achieved in 21 (75.0%) patients (mean age 73.3 ± 10.7 years, 47.6% female). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 53.9% ± 12.1%. The indications for HBP were atrioventricular block (n = 13, 61.9%), sinus node dysfunction (n = 7, 33.3%) and upgrade from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to His-cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n = 1, 4.8%). No significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between Timeframe 1 and Timeframe 2. Improvements pertaining to mean fluoroscopy time were achieved between the two timeframes. There was one HBP-related complication of lead displacement during Timeframe 1. All patients with successful HBP achieved non-selective His bundle (NSHB) capture, whereas only eight patients had selective His bundle (SHB) capture. NSHB and SHB capture thresholds remained stable at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: Permanent HBP is feasible and safe, even without the use of an electrophysiology recording system. This was successfully achieved in 75% of patients, with no adverse clinical outcomes during the follow-up period.https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2022066feasibilityhis bundlelearning curvepacing
spellingShingle Swee Leng Kui
Colin Yeo
Lisa Teo
Ai Ling Him
Sherida Binte Syed Hamid
Kelvin Wong
Vern Hsen Tan
A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up
Singapore Medical Journal
feasibility
his bundle
learning curve
pacing
title A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up
title_full A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up
title_fullStr A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up
title_full_unstemmed A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up
title_short A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up
title_sort single centre experience of his bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system implant success rate safety pacing characteristics and one year follow up
topic feasibility
his bundle
learning curve
pacing
url https://journals.lww.com/10.11622/smedj.2022066
work_keys_str_mv AT sweelengkui asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT colinyeo asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT lisateo asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT ailinghim asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT sheridabintesyedhamid asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT kelvinwong asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT vernhsentan asinglecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT sweelengkui singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT colinyeo singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT lisateo singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT ailinghim singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT sheridabintesyedhamid singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT kelvinwong singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup
AT vernhsentan singlecentreexperienceofhisbundlepacingwithoutelectrophysiologicalmappingsystemimplantsuccessratesafetypacingcharacteristicsandoneyearfollowup