Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities

Coastal lagoons are an important habitat for endemic and threatened species in California that have suffered impacts from urbanization and increased drought. Environmental DNA has been promoted as a way to aid in the monitoring of biological communities, but much remains to be understood on the bias...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Turba, Rachel, Thai, Glory H., Jacobs, David K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peer Community In 2023-04-01
Series:Peer Community Journal
Online Access:https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.256/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206412158959616
author Turba, Rachel
Thai, Glory H.
Jacobs, David K.
author_facet Turba, Rachel
Thai, Glory H.
Jacobs, David K.
author_sort Turba, Rachel
collection DOAJ
description Coastal lagoons are an important habitat for endemic and threatened species in California that have suffered impacts from urbanization and increased drought. Environmental DNA has been promoted as a way to aid in the monitoring of biological communities, but much remains to be understood on the biases introduced by different protocols meant to overcome challenges presented by unique systems under study. Turbid water is one methodologic challenge to eDNA recovery in these systems as it quickly clogs filters, preventing timely processing of samples. We investigated biases in community composition produced by two solutions to overcome slow filtration due to turbidity: freezing of water prior to filtration (for storage purposes and long-term processing), and use of sediment (as opposed to water samples). Bias assessments of community composition in downstream eDNA analysis was conducted for two sets of primers, 12S (fish) and 16S (bacteria and archaea). Our results show that freezing water prior to filtration had different effects on community composition for each primer, especially for the 16S, when using a filter of larger pore size (3 μm). Nevertheless, pre-freezing water samples can still be a viable alternative for storage and processing of turbid water samples when focusing on fish communities (12S). The use of sediment samples as an alternative to processing water samples should be done with caution, and at minimum the number of biological replicates and/or volume sampled should be increased.
format Article
id doaj-art-89884c5fea454600a434d8f52ab5debb
institution Kabale University
issn 2804-3871
language English
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Peer Community In
record_format Article
series Peer Community Journal
spelling doaj-art-89884c5fea454600a434d8f52ab5debb2025-02-07T10:16:49ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712023-04-01310.24072/pcjournal.25610.24072/pcjournal.256Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities Turba, Rachel0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-4503Thai, Glory H.1Jacobs, David K.2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-1601Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 USACoastal lagoons are an important habitat for endemic and threatened species in California that have suffered impacts from urbanization and increased drought. Environmental DNA has been promoted as a way to aid in the monitoring of biological communities, but much remains to be understood on the biases introduced by different protocols meant to overcome challenges presented by unique systems under study. Turbid water is one methodologic challenge to eDNA recovery in these systems as it quickly clogs filters, preventing timely processing of samples. We investigated biases in community composition produced by two solutions to overcome slow filtration due to turbidity: freezing of water prior to filtration (for storage purposes and long-term processing), and use of sediment (as opposed to water samples). Bias assessments of community composition in downstream eDNA analysis was conducted for two sets of primers, 12S (fish) and 16S (bacteria and archaea). Our results show that freezing water prior to filtration had different effects on community composition for each primer, especially for the 16S, when using a filter of larger pore size (3 μm). Nevertheless, pre-freezing water samples can still be a viable alternative for storage and processing of turbid water samples when focusing on fish communities (12S). The use of sediment samples as an alternative to processing water samples should be done with caution, and at minimum the number of biological replicates and/or volume sampled should be increased. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.256/
spellingShingle Turba, Rachel
Thai, Glory H.
Jacobs, David K.
Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities
Peer Community Journal
title Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities
title_full Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities
title_fullStr Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities
title_full_unstemmed Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities
title_short Different approaches to processing environmental DNA samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish, bacterial and archaea communities
title_sort different approaches to processing environmental dna samples in turbid waters have distinct effects for fish bacterial and archaea communities
url https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.256/
work_keys_str_mv AT turbarachel differentapproachestoprocessingenvironmentaldnasamplesinturbidwatershavedistincteffectsforfishbacterialandarchaeacommunities
AT thaigloryh differentapproachestoprocessingenvironmentaldnasamplesinturbidwatershavedistincteffectsforfishbacterialandarchaeacommunities
AT jacobsdavidk differentapproachestoprocessingenvironmentaldnasamplesinturbidwatershavedistincteffectsforfishbacterialandarchaeacommunities