A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judg...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Peer Community In
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | Peer Community Journal |
| Online Access: | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.432/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825206412696879104 |
|---|---|
| author | Tagu, Denis Boudet-Bône, Françoise Brard, Camille Legouy, Edith Gaymard, Frédéric |
| author_facet | Tagu, Denis Boudet-Bône, Françoise Brard, Camille Legouy, Edith Gaymard, Frédéric |
| author_sort | Tagu, Denis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8b5f635b807d4097826b61da4b32f6b2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2804-3871 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-08-01 |
| publisher | Peer Community In |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Peer Community Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-8b5f635b807d4097826b61da4b32f6b22025-02-07T10:17:18ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712024-08-01410.24072/pcjournal.43210.24072/pcjournal.432A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France Tagu, Denis0Boudet-Bône, Françoise1Brard, Camille2Legouy, Edith3Gaymard, Frédéric4 INRAE, Direction de l’Evaluation (DEV), Unité 0837, 147 rue de l'université, 75338 Cedex 07, France INRAE, Direction de l’Evaluation (DEV), Unité 0837, 147 rue de l'université, 75338 Cedex 07, FranceINRAE, Direction pour la Science Ouverte (DipSO), Unité 1479, 147 rue de l'université, 75338 Cedex 07, FranceINRAE, Collège de Direction (CODIR), Unité 0233, 147 rue de l'université, 75338 Cedex 07, France INRAE, Direction de l’Evaluation (DEV), Unité 0837, 147 rue de l'université, 75338 Cedex 07, FrancePsychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.432/ |
| spellingShingle | Tagu, Denis Boudet-Bône, Françoise Brard, Camille Legouy, Edith Gaymard, Frédéric A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France Peer Community Journal |
| title | A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
|
| title_full | A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
|
| title_fullStr | A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
|
| title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
|
| title_short | A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
|
| title_sort | qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists a perspective based on a case study of inrae france |
| url | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.432/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tagudenis aqualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT boudetbonefrancoise aqualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT brardcamille aqualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT legouyedith aqualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT gaymardfrederic aqualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT tagudenis qualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT boudetbonefrancoise qualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT brardcamille qualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT legouyedith qualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance AT gaymardfrederic qualitativeandmulticriteriaassessmentofscientistsaperspectivebasedonacasestudyofinraefrance |