Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of indications, methods and results of prenatal diagnostic invasive procedures performed in our clinic in a four-year process and interpretation of relations between them. STUDY DESIGN: In this study 553 patients were examined retrospectively, who were undergone prenatal inva...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Medical Network
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823857293180010496 |
|---|---|
| author | Emre Ekmekçi Kutlu Kurt Servet Gençdal Emine Demirel Sefa Kelekçi |
| author_facet | Emre Ekmekçi Kutlu Kurt Servet Gençdal Emine Demirel Sefa Kelekçi |
| author_sort | Emre Ekmekçi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of indications, methods and results of prenatal diagnostic invasive procedures performed in our clinic in a four-year process and interpretation of relations between them.
STUDY DESIGN: In this study 553 patients were examined retrospectively, who were undergone prenatal invasive procedures in our clinic for determination of fetal karyotype. Demographic distribution of the patients, indications for tests and results were examined, complications were evaluated depending on the procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 41 abnormal karyotype pregnancies detected, the most common abnormal karyotype was trisomy 21 and most of abnormal karyotypes were detected in patients who undergone invasive diagnostic tests due to abnormal ultrasound findings. Abortion is resulted at two patients.
CONCLUSION: Although non-invasive prenatal diagnosis is more accessible today and has become more preferable, prenatal invasive diagnosing still remains its importance in prenatal diagnosis. Especially in the cases with presence of abnormal ultrasound findings, invasive prenatal diagnosis should be the primary diagnostic method.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-916814eb39344dee9e04cda6105d98d4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1300-4751 2602-4918 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | Medical Network |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-916814eb39344dee9e04cda6105d98d42025-02-11T21:26:21ZengMedical NetworkGynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine1300-47512602-49182015-12-012131Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in TurkeyEmre Ekmekçi0Kutlu Kurt1Servet Gençdal2Emine Demirel3Sefa Kelekçi4İzmir Katip Çelebi University Medicine Faculty, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, İzmirİzmir Atatürk Research and Education Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, İzmirİzmir Atatürk Research and Education Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, İzmirİzmir Katip Çelebi University Medicine Faculty, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, İzmirİzmir Katip Çelebi University Medicine Faculty, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, İzmir OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of indications, methods and results of prenatal diagnostic invasive procedures performed in our clinic in a four-year process and interpretation of relations between them. STUDY DESIGN: In this study 553 patients were examined retrospectively, who were undergone prenatal invasive procedures in our clinic for determination of fetal karyotype. Demographic distribution of the patients, indications for tests and results were examined, complications were evaluated depending on the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 41 abnormal karyotype pregnancies detected, the most common abnormal karyotype was trisomy 21 and most of abnormal karyotypes were detected in patients who undergone invasive diagnostic tests due to abnormal ultrasound findings. Abortion is resulted at two patients. CONCLUSION: Although non-invasive prenatal diagnosis is more accessible today and has become more preferable, prenatal invasive diagnosing still remains its importance in prenatal diagnosis. Especially in the cases with presence of abnormal ultrasound findings, invasive prenatal diagnosis should be the primary diagnostic method. https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/1Prenatal invasive testFetal karyotypeTrisomy 21 |
| spellingShingle | Emre Ekmekçi Kutlu Kurt Servet Gençdal Emine Demirel Sefa Kelekçi Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine Prenatal invasive test Fetal karyotype Trisomy 21 |
| title | Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey |
| title_full | Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey |
| title_fullStr | Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey |
| title_short | Prenatal Invasive Testing: A 4-Years Single Institution Experience in Turkey |
| title_sort | prenatal invasive testing a 4 years single institution experience in turkey |
| topic | Prenatal invasive test Fetal karyotype Trisomy 21 |
| url | https://gorm.com.tr/index.php/GORM/article/view/1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emreekmekci prenatalinvasivetestinga4yearssingleinstitutionexperienceinturkey AT kutlukurt prenatalinvasivetestinga4yearssingleinstitutionexperienceinturkey AT servetgencdal prenatalinvasivetestinga4yearssingleinstitutionexperienceinturkey AT eminedemirel prenatalinvasivetestinga4yearssingleinstitutionexperienceinturkey AT sefakelekci prenatalinvasivetestinga4yearssingleinstitutionexperienceinturkey |